CFG
Price
$47.54
Change
+$0.74 (+1.58%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.64B
88 days until earnings call
TFC
Price
$47.65
Change
+$2.67 (+5.94%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
52.02B
89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CFG vs TFC

Header iconCFG vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs TFCBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$47.54
Change+$0.74 (+1.58%)
Volume$6.4M
Capitalization16.64B
Truist Financial
Price$47.65
Change+$2.67 (+5.94%)
Volume$15.7M
Capitalization52.02B
CFG vs TFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. TFC commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a Hold and TFC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $47.54 vs. TFC: $47.65)
Brand notoriety: CFG and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 160% vs. TFC: 210%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $16.64B vs. TFC: $52.02B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $16.64B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $52.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than CFG.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.79% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +11.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($52B) has a higher market cap than CFG($16.6B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than TFC: CFG (11.39) vs TFC (7.93). TFC YTD gains are higher at: 9.843 vs. CFG (8.638). CFG has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. TFC (5.07B). CFG has less debt than TFC: CFG (14B) vs TFC (59.7B). TFC has higher revenues than CFG: TFC (23.4B) vs CFG (8.22B).
CFGTFCCFG / TFC
Capitalization16.6B52B32%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.6389.84388%
P/E Ratio11.397.93144%
Revenue8.22B23.4B35%
Total Cash11.6B5.07B229%
Total Debt14B59.7B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
146
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5086
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1183
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFG's Valuation (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (65) in the null industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (86) in the null industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CFG (6) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (46) in the null industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for TFC (83) in the null industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew significantly faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHMI3.000.09
+3.09%
CHERRY HILL MORTGAGE INVESTMENT Corp
WLDN38.090.10
+0.26%
Willdan Group
FCPT27.56-0.17
-0.61%
Four Corners Property Trust
GWRE178.58-1.18
-0.66%
Guidewire Software
SCNI3.51-0.06
-1.54%
Scinai Immunotherapeutics Ltd.