CFG
Price
$54.66
Change
+$0.08 (+0.15%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
23.44B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TFC
Price
$46.84
Change
+$0.36 (+0.77%)
Updated
Dec 3, 12:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
59.57B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs TFC

Header iconCFG vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs TFCBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$54.66
Change+$0.08 (+0.15%)
Volume$5.45M
Capitalization23.44B
Truist Financial
Price$46.84
Change+$0.36 (+0.77%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization59.57B
CFG vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. TFC commentary
Dec 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a StrongBuy and TFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $54.66 vs. TFC: $46.48)
Brand notoriety: CFG and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 125% vs. TFC: 56%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $23.44B vs. TFC: $59.57B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $23.44B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $59.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CFG and TFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the short-term than TFC.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.87% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.93% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($59.6B) has a higher market cap than CFG($23.4B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than TFC: CFG (15.31) vs TFC (12.46). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 29.699 vs. TFC (12.441). CFG has more cash in the bank: 8.55B vs. TFC (4.33B). CFG has less debt than TFC: CFG (12.8B) vs TFC (71.1B). TFC has higher revenues than CFG: TFC (20.1B) vs CFG (7.85B).
CFGTFCCFG / TFC
Capitalization23.4B59.6B39%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.69912.441239%
P/E Ratio15.3112.46123%
Revenue7.85B20.1B39%
Total Cash8.55B4.33B197%
Total Debt12.8B71.1B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2518
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3872
SMR RATING
1..100
74
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2136
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6436
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7555

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CFG (76) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (72) in the null industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CFG (7) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (36) in the null industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CFG (64) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APLY14.100.06
+0.43%
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
EMM32.980.10
+0.29%
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
CEF42.010.09
+0.21%
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust
WTMU25.82N/A
N/A
WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal
BKMC108.55-0.17
-0.16%
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+0.15%
FNB - CFG
93%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
KEY - CFG
93%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
WBS - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
HBAN - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
FITB - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
More