Advertisement
CHD vs KMB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Church & Dwight (CHD) vs. Kimberly-Clark (KMB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CHD and KMB delivered Q1 2026 earnings beats, with CHD posting 5% organic sales growth and KMB showing 3% organic volume growth.
- CHD has outperformed year-to-date with a 14.9% gain, compared to KMB's roughly flat performance.
- KMB offers a higher dividend yield of 5.24%, versus CHD's 1.28%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks trading near $96-98, within their 52-week ranges, reflecting defensive positioning in consumer staples.
- CHD trades at a higher trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 31.6, while KMB's is 18.9, indicating different valuation perspectives.
Introduction
Church & Dwight (CHD) and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) are leading consumer staples companies, producing essential household and personal care products. This comparison examines their recent performance, financial metrics, and market positioning amid stable demand for defensive stocks. Investors seeking reliable dividends, low volatility, or growth in everyday essentials may find value in analyzing these peers, particularly as both navigate pricing pressures and organic expansion in recent market activity.
CHD Overview and Recent Performance
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. manufactures household products like Arm & Hammer baking soda, Trojan condoms, and OxiClean cleaners, operating in a stable consumer staples sector. In recent weeks, CHD shares have traded around $96, up year-to-date by 14.9% and showing positive momentum post-Q1 2026 earnings. The company reported adjusted EPS (earnings per share) of $0.95, surpassing estimates, with 5% organic sales growth driven by volume gains and distribution expansions offsetting flat top-line revenue. Sentiment has improved on margin gains and affirmed dividends, though higher P/E reflects growth expectations. With a market cap of $22.7 billion and low beta of 0.47, CHD maintains defensive appeal amid broader market rotations.
KMB Overview and Recent Performance
Kimberly-Clark Corporation produces personal care items including Huggies diapers, Kleenex tissues, and Kotex products, focusing on hygiene and health essentials. Shares of KMB hover near $98, with modest year-to-date gains around 2% following Q1 2026 results. Adjusted EPS reached $1.97, beating forecasts, supported by 3% organic volume growth and sales up 2.7% year-over-year, while affirming full-year outlook. Performance reflects steady execution in a challenging environment, bolstered by a high dividend yield, though longer-term price trends show volatility within a 52-week range of $92-$144. Market cap stands at $32.4 billion, with beta at 0.30 underscoring low risk.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 351 available, designed for stocks, ETFs, and crypto across diverse sectors. These bots deliver real-time signals for copy trading, showcasing impressive stats like annualized returns of 50-160%, win rates from 50-88%, and profit factors up to 7+, with average trade durations spanning hours to weeks. Strategies vary by timeframe (e.g., 5min to 60min) and focus areas such as semiconductors, data centers, or volatility plays, enabling users to match styles to market conditions. Exploring these highlights the power of AI in identifying opportunities suited to current trends.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CHD and KMB thrive in consumer staples, emphasizing recurring demand for hygiene products, but differ in scale and focus: CHD leans on household cleaners, while KMB prioritizes diapers and tissues. Growth drivers include organic sales for both, yet CHD edges recent momentum with stronger YTD gains and volume outperformance. Risk profiles are similar, with low betas signaling stability, though KMB's higher debt-to-equity warrants monitoring. Valuation contrasts show KMB's attractive P/E and yield for value seekers, versus CHD's premium for growth. Sentiment tilts positive post-earnings for each, with analyst targets implying 5-15% upside.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models would likely favor CHD in the current environment, given its superior trend consistency, higher recent organic growth, and positive YTD relative performance. While KMB offers compelling income and valuation, CHD's momentum and stability provide a probabilistic edge for trend-following strategies.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHD is a Hold and KMB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CHD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- KMB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CHD (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while KMB (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.93%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHD is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
KMB is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-1.59% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CHD | KMB | CHD / KMB | |
| Capitalization | 22.3B | 31.8B | 70% |
| EBITDA | 1.29B | 3.21B | 40% |
| Gain YTD | 12.877 | -3.762 | -342% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.94 | 18.55 | 167% |
| Revenue | 6.21B | 16.6B | 37% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 542M | - |
| Total Debt | 2.21B | 7.08B | 31% |
CHD | KMB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KMB's Valuation (14) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHD (58). This means that KMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHD’s over the last 12 months.
CHD's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (100). This means that CHD’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.
KMB's SMR Rating (11) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHD (51). This means that KMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHD’s over the last 12 months.
CHD's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (61). This means that CHD’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.
KMB's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CHD (74). This means that KMB’s stock grew similarly to CHD’s over the last 12 months.
| CHD | KMB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 49% | 12 days ago 42% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| COTG | 16.29 | 0.26 | +1.60% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | |||
| STOT | 46.93 | -0.06 | -0.13% |
| State Street®DoubleLine®ShrtDurTRTactETF | |||
| BSJW | 25.24 | -0.11 | -0.42% |
| Invesco BulltShr 2032 Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF | |||
| SLYG | 105.79 | -1.98 | -1.84% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Sm Cp GrETF | |||
| FLMX | 37.70 | -0.81 | -2.10% |
| Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | |||
CHD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHD has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHD jumps, then PG could also see price increases.
KMB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been loosely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then CL could also see price increases.