For investors evaluating the consumer staples sector, CHD and PG represent two fundamentally different approaches to the same industry. Procter & Gamble is the global titan — a $350-billion-dollar behemoth with a portfolio spanning fabric care, beauty, grooming, health care, baby care, and home care. Church & Dwight, while hardly a niche player, operates at a fraction of PG's scale with a concentrated lineup of brands led by its flagship ARM & HAMMER franchise. This comparison matters for anyone weighing growth potential against stability, examining how different-sized players navigate cost pressures, or seeking exposure to defensive consumer demand in uncertain economic conditions.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD), headquartered in Ewing, New Jersey, has built a formidable consumer products portfolio anchored by the iconic ARM & HAMMER brand, alongside well-known names such as TROJAN, OXICLEAN, BATISTE, WATERPIK, THERABREATH, HERO, and FIRST RESPONSE. The company operates across three segments: Consumer Domestic, Consumer International, and Specialty Products, with roughly 82% of net sales coming from the United States.
In recent market activity, CHD has shown notable resilience. The stock has rallied meaningfully from its 52-week low of $81.33, trading near the $98 level as of mid-July 2026. The company reported first-quarter 2026 earnings that exceeded analyst expectations, delivering EPS (earnings per share) of $0.95 versus the $0.93 consensus estimate, on revenue of $1.47 billion. Perhaps most encouragingly, organic sales grew 5.0% in the quarter, substantially ahead of the company's own 3% outlook. Management reaffirmed full-year 2026 EPS guidance of $3.71 to $3.81. In a strategic move, Church & Dwight also completed the acquisition of the fast-growing Miss Mouth's Messy Eater stain-removal brand for approximately $325 million in late May 2026, signaling continued appetite for portfolio expansion. Institutional ownership stands at roughly 87%, reflecting sustained professional investor confidence.
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG), based in Cincinnati, Ohio, is one of the world's largest and most diversified consumer packaged goods companies. Its brand portfolio includes household staples such as Tide, Pampers, Gillette, Crest, Dawn, Bounty, Charmin, and Olay, organized across segments including Fabric & Home Care, Baby Feminine & Family Care, Beauty, Health Care, and Grooming.
PG's recent stock performance has been comparatively subdued. Shares have traded in a range roughly between $152 and $180 over the past 52 weeks, with the stock hovering around $150 as of mid-July 2026 — near the lower end of that range. For its fiscal year 2025 (ended June 2025), PG reported net sales of $84.3 billion, essentially flat year-over-year, though organic sales increased 2%. Diluted EPS (earnings per share) grew 8% to $6.51, and core EPS reached $6.83, up 4%. The company has provided fiscal 2026 guidance calling for revenue growth of 1% to 5% and core EPS growth of 3% to 9%, but it also warned of a potential $1 billion headwind from tariffs. PG announced plans to cut up to 7,000 employees by 2027 as part of a restructuring effort targeting up to $1.6 billion in savings. With a dividend yield near 2.7% and a beta of just 0.20, PG continues to appeal to risk-averse investors, though volume growth and pricing power have faced scrutiny in recent quarters.
In a market environment where consumer staples stocks face cross-currents from tariff policy, shifting consumer spending patterns, and cost inflation, traders are increasingly turning to data-driven tools for an edge. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's hundreds of AI Trading Bots — each designed to trade thousands of different tickers with distinct strategies, timeframes, and risk profiles. Only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn placement in this curated section. The bots span diverse trading styles including swing trading, trend following, and pattern recognition, with performance statistics that can include annualized returns, win rates, and average trade durations. Whether you are focused on consumer staples like CHD and PG or exploring broader market opportunities, the Trending AI Robots section offers a window into which automated strategies are navigating the current landscape most effectively.
Placing these two consumer staples names side by side reveals a classic large-cap-versus-mid-cap trade-off within the same sector. PG's $350 billion market capitalization dwarfs CHD's $23 billion, and with that scale comes meaningful structural differences. PG operates across a far more diversified global footprint — approximately half its revenue originates outside North America — while CHD remains heavily U.S.-dependent. This gives PG broader exposure to currency fluctuations and geopolitical risk, but also wider growth avenues in emerging markets.
On the growth axis, CHD currently holds the advantage. The company's 5% organic sales growth in its most recent quarter outpaces PG's 2% organic growth for its full fiscal year, and CHD's year-to-date stock performance of roughly 17-18% far exceeds PG's roughly 6% gain. CHD's recent acquisition activity also points to a more aggressive expansion posture. However, investors pay a premium for that growth: CHD's trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of approximately 32 sits well above PG's ratio of roughly 25.
Income-oriented investors face a clear choice. PG's dividend yield of approximately 2.7% is more than double CHD's 1.2%. PG has also been a Dividend Aristocrat with decades of consecutive increases, representing a far longer track record of returning cash to shareholders. On the risk side, PG's tariff exposure is explicit and quantified at up to $1 billion, while CHD's smaller international footprint partially insulates it. PG's restructuring plan, involving thousands of job cuts, may support margins over time but introduces execution risk in the near term. Finally, PG's beta of 0.20 makes it one of the least volatile stocks in the S&P 500, while CHD's beta of 0.47 — though still defensive — signals somewhat greater sensitivity to broader market moves.
Based on observable trend data, momentum indicators, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI analysis would likely favor CHD in the current environment — with important caveats. The stock's stronger organic sales growth, upward earnings trajectory, and materially better year-to-date price performance suggest a more consistent positive trend profile. The AI's evaluation framework would also note that CHD's recent earnings beat and strategic acquisition activity provide near-term catalysts that PG's flatter top-line narrative currently lacks. However, this probabilistic assessment comes with trade-offs: PG's vastly larger scale, higher dividend yield, lower beta, and more diversified revenue base make it the more resilient choice in a risk-off scenario. The AI would likely recognize that while CHD has stronger near-term momentum, PG's stability metrics and income characteristics continue to position it as the steadier, lower-volatility holding for the risk-averse long-term investor.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHD (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -0.44% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -0.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.32%.
CHD is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
PG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CHD | PG | CHD / PG | |
| Capitalization | 23.1B | 343B | 7% |
| EBITDA | 1.29B | 24.9B | 5% |
| Gain YTD | 17.186 | 5.150 | 334% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.12 | 21.55 | 149% |
| Revenue | 6.21B | 86.7B | 7% |
| Total Cash | 503M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.21B | 37B | 6% |
CHD | PG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PG's Valuation (28) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHD (65). This means that PG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHD’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CHD (67). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to CHD’s over the last 12 months.
PG's SMR Rating (32) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CHD (52). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to CHD’s over the last 12 months.
CHD's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (57). This means that CHD’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.
PG's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CHD (75). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to CHD’s over the last 12 months.
| CHD | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 50% | 10 days ago 44% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 46% | 5 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 23% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHD has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHD jumps, then CL could also see price increases.