Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) represent established players in the consumer staples space, offering investors exposure to everyday household essentials. This comparison examines their business profiles, recent stock behavior, and key differentiators within the current market environment. Institutional and retail investors focused on defensive equities, dividend consistency, or relative value within the personal care and household products subsector may find this analysis relevant for portfolio positioning and sector allocation decisions.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. manufactures and markets a range of consumer products, including baking soda-based items under the Arm & Hammer brand as well as other household and personal care lines. In recent weeks, the stock has traded in a relatively stable range near $97, supported by positive first-quarter results that showed organic sales growth exceeding internal targets. Broader market activity has reflected investor attention on upcoming second-quarter earnings, scheduled for July 31, with expectations centered on margin expansion and volume trends. Sentiment has remained constructive amid the company’s ongoing portfolio adjustments and market share performance across domestic and international segments.
Colgate-Palmolive Company produces oral care, personal care, and pet nutrition products sold globally under well-known brands. The stock has hovered around $90-$91 in recent trading sessions, buoyed by steady dividend declarations and preparations for second-quarter results also set for July 31. Recent market activity has highlighted analyst focus on organic sales trends and cost management amid inflationary pressures. Investor sentiment appears balanced, reflecting the company’s established international presence and consistent cash flow generation typical of mature consumer staples businesses.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in the trending section, where users can review statistics such as win rates, profit factors, and drawdown ranges that typically span from conservative single-digit returns to more aggressive double-digit profiles depending on the bot’s risk parameters. All AI trading bots feature distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and sets of tickers they trade. Review the latest options on the Trending AI Robots page to explore opportunities aligned with current conditions.
Both companies maintain asset-light business models centered on branded consumer products, yet CHD derives a larger share of revenue from domestic household categories while CL benefits from broader global oral-care leadership. Growth drivers differ modestly, with CHD emphasizing organic volume gains and portfolio streamlining, contrasted by CL’s focus on emerging-market penetration and steady dividend support. Recent momentum shows comparable year-to-date advances, though CHD has edged ahead slightly on percentage terms. Risk factors include commodity cost exposure for both, alongside category-specific pressures such as competition in oral care for CL and pricing dynamics in household goods for CHD. Market sentiment remains defensive for the sector overall, with neither stock exhibiting pronounced outperformance relative to peers in recent activity.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent quarters, earnings visibility ahead of the July 31 reports, and relative stability within the consumer staples sector, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a modest edge to CHD for its demonstrated organic growth momentum and portfolio optimization efforts. That assessment remains probabilistic and could shift with incoming earnings data or broader market movements.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHD (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.97% price change this week, while CL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.72%.
CHD is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
CL is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CHD | CL | CHD / CL | |
| Capitalization | 24B | 74.1B | 32% |
| EBITDA | 1.31B | 3.84B | 34% |
| Gain YTD | 21.603 | 19.741 | 109% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.47 | 36.59 | 89% |
| Revenue | 6.23B | 21B | 30% |
| Total Cash | 255M | 1.37B | 19% |
| Total Debt | 2.26B | 7.86B | 29% |
CHD | CL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHD's Valuation (68) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (94). This means that CHD’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CHD (66). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to CHD’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHD (52). This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHD’s over the last 12 months.
CHD's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (53). This means that CHD’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHD (80). This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHD’s over the last 12 months.
| CHD | CL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 49% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 39% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHD has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHD jumps, then CL could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.