Advertisement
CHD vs CL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) vs. Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CHD has shown stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at approximately 15.5% compared to CL's 9.4%, reflecting better short-term momentum in recent market activity.
- Both stocks operate in the consumer staples sector with low betas—CHD at 0.47 and CL at 0.33—indicating lower volatility relative to the broader market.
- CHD boasts a higher profit margin of 11.88% versus CL's 10.46%, supporting its relative outperformance.
- Market caps differ significantly: CL at $68.5 billion dwarfs CHD's $22.9 billion, offering scale advantages for the former.
- Both companies report Q1 2026 earnings on May 1, with analysts anticipating growth amid stable consumer demand.
- P/E ratios (price-to-earnings) are similar, around 32, suggesting comparable valuations in the current environment.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines CHD and CL, two established players in the consumer staples sector focused on household and personal care products. Investors seeking defensive positions amid market volatility may find value in evaluating their relative performance, growth drivers, and risk profiles. Traders monitoring short-term momentum or upcoming earnings catalysts will appreciate insights into recent price behavior and sentiment shifts. With both exhibiting resilience in recent weeks, this analysis highlights key contrasts for informed decision-making in today's market positioning.
CHD Overview and Recent Performance
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) develops, manufactures, and markets household consumer products under brands like Arm & Hammer and OxiClean, alongside personal care items such as Trojan and First Response. Operating in consumer domestic, international, and specialty products segments, the company benefits from steady demand for everyday essentials. In recent market activity, CHD shares have demonstrated robust momentum, gaining about 15.5% over the past three months and 15.5% YTD, trading around $96 with a 52-week range of $81–$106. Sentiment has been bolstered by a history of earnings beats and anticipation for Q1 2026 results on May 1, despite concerns over revenue growth and elevated valuations. Stable consumer spending and product innovation have supported this upward trend.
CL Overview and Recent Performance
Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is a global leader in oral care, personal care, home care, and pet nutrition, with flagship brands like Colgate toothpaste and Hill's pet food sold in over 200 countries. Its segments emphasize premiumization and emerging market expansion. Shares have advanced approximately 9.4% YTD, trading near $85 within a 52-week range of $75–$99, reflecting steady but more moderate gains in recent weeks. Positive investor interest stems from its strong developing-country footprint and Q1 earnings preview on May 1, though governance discussions and slower organic growth have tempered enthusiasm. Resilient demand in core categories has underpinned performance.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from a library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies, including technical and fundamental analysis, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes and risk levels spanning low to high volatility. Designed for copy trading, they offer real-time signals via signal agents (no minimum balance), virtual agents with risk management, or brokerage-linked execution. Performance varies by market conditions, highlighting the most suitable for current trends. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligning with your trading style and discover opportunities in dynamic markets like those for CHD and CL.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CHD and CL thrive in consumer staples, but differ in scale and focus: CHD emphasizes U.S.-centric household specialties, while CL leverages global oral and pet nutrition for broader exposure. Growth drivers include CHD's innovation in niche products versus CL's premiumization in emerging markets. Recent momentum favors CHD with superior YTD gains, though CL offers greater stability via its larger revenue base ($20B vs. $6B). Risk factors are muted with low betas, but CHD faces valuation pressures while CL navigates governance scrutiny. Market sentiment tilts toward CHD pre-earnings, balancing trade-offs in relative performance and sector resilience.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models would likely favor CHD in the current environment due to its consistent short-term trend strength, higher YTD returns, and superior profit margins amid stable consumer demand. While CL provides scale and international diversification, CHD's relative momentum and catalysts position it probabilistically ahead for near-term positioning.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHD is a StrongBuy and CL is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CHD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CHD (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -3.28% price change this week, while CL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +2.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHD is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
CL is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+1.44% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CHD | CL | CHD / CL | |
| Capitalization | 22.2B | 69.9B | 32% |
| EBITDA | 1.29B | 3.9B | 33% |
| Gain YTD | 12.307 | 11.922 | 103% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.88 | 33.86 | 91% |
| Revenue | 6.21B | 20.8B | 30% |
| Total Cash | 503M | 1.34B | 38% |
| Total Debt | 2.21B | 7.97B | 28% |
CHD | CL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHD's Valuation (57) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (98). This means that CHD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CHD (73). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to CHD’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHD (51). This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHD’s over the last 12 months.
CL's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CHD (56). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to CHD’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHD (79). This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHD’s over the last 12 months.
| CHD | CL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 1 day ago 39% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 1 day ago 42% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 17 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 1 day ago 23% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 1 day ago 46% |
Advertisement
CHD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHD has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHD jumps, then PG could also see price increases.