Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) and Unilever PLC (UL) represent two established players in the consumer staples sector. This comparison examines their recent stock behavior, business profiles, and relative positioning amid broader market conditions. The analysis is relevant for traders monitoring short-term momentum, income-oriented investors evaluating dividend stability, and those assessing defensive equities with varying geographic and brand exposures. Both stocks offer exposure to everyday consumer products, yet they differ in scale, market focus, and recent performance trajectories.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) manufactures and markets household and personal care products under brands such as Arm & Hammer, Trojan, and OxiClean. The company maintains a concentrated U.S. presence with selective international operations. In recent weeks, CHD shares have traded near the $97 level, reflecting modest volatility ahead of its July 31 earnings report. Year-to-date returns reached approximately 17%, outpacing the broader market. Over the trailing twelve months, the stock posted a decline of about 3%, lagging the S&P 500. Upcoming quarterly results carry expectations for EPS of $0.89, down year-over-year, though a slight positive earnings surprise prediction exists. Recent regulatory filings have drawn S&P 500-related attention, contributing to sentiment around the name.
Unilever PLC (UL) is a multinational consumer goods company with a diversified portfolio spanning personal care, beauty, home care, and foods. It maintains significant operations across developed and emerging markets. Shares have recently traded in the $60–$62 range, with a close near $60.94 as of late July. Year-to-date performance stands at approximately 5%, trailing CHD. The company is scheduled to report second-quarter results on July 28, with consensus estimates calling for EPS of $1.85 and revenue near $29.5 billion. Broader market conditions and portfolio optimization efforts have influenced trading, while the stock continues to offer a dividend yield advantage within the sector.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Bots feature varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with statistics often spanning win rates, average returns, and drawdown ranges that help users evaluate fit. The platform updates selections dynamically based on quantitative criteria. Investors and traders seeking automated strategies aligned with current conditions can explore the full curated list on the Trending AI Robots page.
CHD and UL both serve the consumer staples space yet differ in business model and exposure. CHD focuses on a narrower set of high-margin U.S. brands, while UL operates at larger global scale with broader category and geographic diversification. Recent momentum favors CHD on a year-to-date basis, whereas UL delivers higher dividend income. Valuation metrics show CHD commanding a premium, potentially reflecting growth perceptions, while UL offers more attractive yield characteristics. Risk factors include CHD’s earnings sensitivity and UL’s exposure to currency and emerging-market dynamics. Sector sentiment remains defensive for both, with limited near-term catalysts beyond scheduled earnings releases.
Based on observable factors including stronger year-to-date trend consistency, relative outperformance, and positioning ahead of earnings, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable momentum to CHD over UL. UL retains appeal for income stability and global diversification. The assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation of recent data rather than definitive forecasts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHD (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.97% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -1.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.55%.
CHD is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CHD | UL | CHD / UL | |
| Capitalization | 24B | 135B | 18% |
| EBITDA | 1.31B | 11.1B | 12% |
| Gain YTD | 21.603 | -2.501 | -864% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.47 | 20.80 | 156% |
| Revenue | 6.23B | 50.5B | 12% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.26B | N/A | - |
CHD | UL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UL's Valuation (31) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHD (68). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHD’s over the last 12 months.
CHD's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (83). This means that CHD’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
UL's SMR Rating (30) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CHD (52). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to CHD’s over the last 12 months.
CHD's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (58). This means that CHD’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
UL's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CHD (80). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to CHD’s over the last 12 months.
| CHD | UL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 42% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 36% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 49% | 10 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 28% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHD has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHD jumps, then CL could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.