Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) and Unilever PLC (UL) represent stalwarts in the consumer defensive sector, focusing on household and personal care products that thrive in volatile markets. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and growth drivers, aiding traders seeking relative outperformance and long-term investors prioritizing stability and dividends. With both exhibiting resilience amid economic shifts, understanding their contrasts in scale, valuation, and catalysts helps inform portfolio decisions in today's environment.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) is a leading U.S. producer of household consumer products, including baking soda under Arm & Hammer, cat litters, laundry detergents, personal care items like Trojan condoms and Orajel oral treatments, and specialty chemicals. Operating primarily through its Consumer Domestic, Consumer International, and Specialty Products segments, the company benefits from steady demand for everyday essentials.
In recent market activity, CHD's stock has demonstrated resilience, gaining over 15% in the past three months and posting YTD returns near 15%. Trading around $96 with a market capitalization of $23 billion, it reflects optimism from raised annual sales and profit forecasts driven by strong demand. Sentiment has been bolstered by a history of earnings beats, with investors eyeing upcoming quarterly results for continued momentum, though high valuation poses scrutiny.
Unilever PLC (UL) is a multinational consumer goods giant offering a vast portfolio across Beauty & Wellbeing (Dove, Vaseline), Personal Care (Lifebuoy, Axe), Home Care (OMO), and Foods segments. With global reach, it produces soaps, shampoos, ice creams, and teas, emphasizing sustainable innovation and emerging market exposure.
Recently, UL's shares have faced pressure, trading near $57 amid a pullback from 52-week highs, with YTD performance mixed around flat to modestly positive in some metrics but lagging broader indices over three months. Market cap exceeds $125 billion, supported by a solid earnings per share (EPS) of $3.04. Key influences include the strategic merger of its Foods business with McCormick, aiming to refocus on high-growth areas like personal care, alongside analyst upgrades signaling cautious optimism.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, meticulously curated from hundreds available—specifically, 25 elite bots selected out of 351 total. These bots employ diverse strategies, including short-term scalping, swing trading, and pattern recognition across thousands of tickers, with performance metrics highlighting win rates often exceeding 60%, profitable trade frequencies up to 80%, and average returns varying by timeframe from daily swings to longer holds. Tailored to current market conditions, they adapt to volatility in sectors like consumer goods. Traders can explore these automated tools for data-driven signals on stocks like CHD and UL. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to discover bots suited to your strategy.
CHD and UL both anchor the household and personal products industry but diverge in scale and focus. CHD's niche U.S.-heavy model drives organic growth via branded essentials, contrasting UL's diversified global operations with heavier emerging market reliance, introducing currency and geopolitical risks.
Recent momentum favors CHD, buoyed by demand stability, while UL contends with restructuring headwinds. Valuation trade-offs are stark: CHD's elevated P/E signals premium pricing for consistency, versus UL's attractive yield and lower multiple amid repositioning. Sector exposure overlaps in defensives, but UL offers broader diversification. Sentiment tilts positive for CHD pre-earnings, with UL gaining from strategic shifts.
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward CHD over UL, citing superior trend consistency, recent outperformance, and earnings reliability as key factors. While UL's restructuring holds potential catalysts, CHD's stable positioning in essential goods aligns better with prevailing defensive trends, suggesting higher probability of near-term relative strength.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHD (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.82% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.03%.
CHD is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CHD | UL | CHD / UL | |
| Capitalization | 22.4B | 125B | 18% |
| EBITDA | 1.29B | 11.3B | 11% |
| Gain YTD | 13.228 | -11.655 | -113% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.13 | 18.87 | 165% |
| Revenue | 6.21B | 59.8B | 10% |
| Total Cash | 503M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.21B | N/A | - |
CHD | UL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 48 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UL's Valuation (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CHD (58). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to CHD’s over the last 12 months.
CHD's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (92). This means that CHD’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
CHD's SMR Rating (51) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (97). This means that CHD’s stock grew somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.
CHD's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (78). This means that CHD’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
UL's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CHD (75). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to CHD’s over the last 12 months.
| CHD | UL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 33% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 15 days ago 41% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 28% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLCA | 52.00 | 0.41 | +0.79% |
| Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | |||
| HYI | 10.71 | 0.02 | +0.19% |
| Western Asset High Yield Opportunity Fund Inc | |||
| CPSL | 27.86 | 0.05 | +0.17% |
| Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF | |||
| NDVG | 33.68 | N/A | N/A |
| Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF | |||
| SHY | 82.16 | -0.03 | -0.04% |
| iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHD has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHD jumps, then PG could also see price increases.