Advertisement
CHTR vs LBRDB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHTR is a StrongBuy and LBRDB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHTR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLBRDB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHTR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LBRDB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHTR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBRDB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHTR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LBRDB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CHTR (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -29.12% price change this week, while LBRDB (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHTR is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wireless Telecommunications (-0.64% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| CHTR | LBRDB | CHTR / LBRDB | |
| Capitalization | 41B | 13B | 315% |
| EBITDA | 20.7B | 1.69B | 1,225% |
| Gain YTD | -21.417 | 28.571 | -75% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.47 | 12.08 | 78% |
| Revenue | 54.6B | 983M | 5,554% |
| Total Cash | 709M | 169M | 420% |
| Total Debt | 97.8B | 3.76B | 2,598% |
CHTR | LBRDB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 95 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 34 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHTR's Valuation (76) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LBRDB (88) in the null industry. This means that CHTR’s stock grew similarly to LBRDB’s over the last 12 months.
CHTR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LBRDB (100) in the null industry. This means that CHTR’s stock grew similarly to LBRDB’s over the last 12 months.
CHTR's SMR Rating (26) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBRDB (94) in the null industry. This means that CHTR’s stock grew significantly faster than LBRDB’s over the last 12 months.
LBRDB's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CHTR (65) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that LBRDB’s stock grew similarly to CHTR’s over the last 12 months.
LBRDB's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHTR (89) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that LBRDB’s stock grew significantly faster than CHTR’s over the last 12 months.
| CHTR | LBRDB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 39% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 38% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 58% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 55% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FBL | 49.23 | 9.02 | +22.43% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | |||
| CATF | 48.39 | 0.05 | +0.10% |
| American Century California Muni Bd ETF | |||
| RMIF | 24.84 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF | |||
| PRF | 42.60 | -0.28 | -0.65% |
| Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | |||
| IHF | 41.65 | -0.28 | -0.67% |
| iShares US Healthcare Providers ETF | |||
CHTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHTR has been closely correlated with LBRDK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHTR jumps, then LBRDK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHTR | 100% | -3.76% | ||
| LBRDK - CHTR | 83% Closely correlated | -3.61% | ||
| LBRDA - CHTR | 81% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| CMCSA - CHTR | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| LBRDB - CHTR | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LBTYA - CHTR | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
More | ||||
LBRDB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBRDB has been closely correlated with LBRDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBRDB jumps, then LBRDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBRDB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBRDB | 100% | N/A | ||
| LBRDA - LBRDB | 67% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| LBRDK - LBRDB | 66% Closely correlated | -3.61% | ||
| CHTR - LBRDB | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.76% | ||
| CABO - LBRDB | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.51% | ||
| CMCSA - LBRDB | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.25% | ||
More | ||||