CI
Price
$332.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
78 days until earnings call
ELV
Price
$410.89
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
69 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CI vs ELV

Header iconCI vs ELV Comparison
Open Charts CI vs ELVBanner chart's image
Cigna Group (The)
Price$332.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.68M
CapitalizationN/A
Elevance Health
Price$410.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.45M
CapitalizationN/A
CI vs ELV Comparison Chart
Loading...
CI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
ELV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CI vs. ELV commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CI is a StrongSell and ELV is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CI: $332.04 vs. ELV: $410.89)
Brand notoriety: CI and ELV are both notable
Both companies represent the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CI: 107% vs. ELV: 88%
Market capitalization -- CI: $103.02B vs. ELV: $120.06B
CI [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $103.02B. ELV’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $120.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $451.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $68.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileELV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ELV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CI is a better buy in the long-term than ELV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ELV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ELV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ELV is a better buy in the short-term than CI.

Price Growth

CI (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +5.34% price change this week, while ELV (@Managed Health Care) price change was -4.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -3.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

CI is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

ELV is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (-3.20% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ELV($120B) has a higher market cap than CI($103B). CI (20.94) and ELV (20.46) have similar P/E ratio . CI YTD gains are higher at: 12.235 vs. ELV (-12.055). ELV has more cash in the bank: 36.1B vs. CI (8.75B). ELV has less debt than CI: ELV (25.1B) vs CI (30.9B). CI has higher revenues than ELV: CI (195B) vs ELV (171B).
CIELVCI / ELV
Capitalization103B120B86%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.235-12.055-101%
P/E Ratio20.9420.46102%
Revenue195B171B114%
Total Cash8.75B36.1B24%
Total Debt30.9B25.1B123%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CI vs ELV: Fundamental Ratings
CI
ELV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1631
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5465
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1482
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELV's Valuation (25) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CI (26). This means that ELV’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.

CI's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as ELV (31). This means that CI’s stock grew similarly to ELV’s over the last 12 months.

ELV's SMR Rating (98) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CI (99). This means that ELV’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.

CI's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as ELV (65). This means that CI’s stock grew similarly to ELV’s over the last 12 months.

CI's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Managed Health Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for ELV (82). This means that CI’s stock grew significantly faster than ELV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIELV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
ELV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPI27.40N/A
N/A
Intrepid Potash
MSGS222.31-2.80
-1.24%
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp
BKR43.07-0.60
-1.37%
Baker Hughes Company
NGD2.48-0.06
-2.36%
New Gold
ANTX1.00-0.06
-5.66%
AN2 Therapeutics

CI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CI and ELV have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CI and ELV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CI
1D Price
Change %
CI100%
-2.30%
ELV - CI
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
CNC - CI
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
NEUE - CI
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.81%
UNH - CI
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
CVS - CI
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More

ELV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELV has been closely correlated with UNH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ELV jumps, then UNH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELV
1D Price
Change %
ELV100%
-0.49%
UNH - ELV
79%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
MOH - ELV
73%
Closely correlated
-3.01%
CNC - ELV
70%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
HUM - ELV
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.34%
CVS - ELV
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
More