CI
Price
$277.51
Change
+$3.10 (+1.13%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
73.33B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ELV
Price
$400.54
Change
+$4.26 (+1.07%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
86.86B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CI vs ELV

CI vs ELV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CI vs. ELV commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CI is a Hold and ELV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CI: $277.51 vs. ELV: $400.54)
Brand notoriety: CI and ELV are both notable
Both companies represent the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CI: 117% vs. ELV: 54%
Market capitalization -- CI: $73.33B vs. ELV: $86.86B
CI [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $73.33B. ELV’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $86.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $350.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $66.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileELV’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ELV’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELV is a better buy in the long-term than CI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ELV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ELV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ELV is a better buy in the short-term than CI.

Price Growth

CI (@Managed Health Care) experienced а -1.79% price change this week, while ELV (@Managed Health Care) price change was +0.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CI is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

ELV is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (-3.70% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ELV($86.9B) has a higher market cap than CI($73.3B). ELV has higher P/E ratio than CI: ELV (17.72) vs CI (11.48). ELV YTD gains are higher at: 15.433 vs. CI (1.971). ELV has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. CI (7.17B). ELV (31B) and CI (31.9B) have identical debt. CI has higher revenues than ELV: CI (281B) vs ELV (201B).
CIELVCI / ELV
Capitalization73.3B86.9B84%
EBITDA12.8BN/A-
Gain YTD1.97115.43313%
P/E Ratio11.4817.7265%
Revenue281B201B140%
Total Cash7.17B36B20%
Total Debt31.9B31B103%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CI vs ELV: Fundamental Ratings
CI
ELV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6928
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6588
SMR RATING
1..100
5597
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5931
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8321
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CI's Valuation (4) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as ELV (6). This means that CI’s stock grew similarly to ELV’s over the last 12 months.

CI's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as ELV (88). This means that CI’s stock grew similarly to ELV’s over the last 12 months.

CI's SMR Rating (55) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELV (97). This means that CI’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELV’s over the last 12 months.

ELV's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CI (59). This means that ELV’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.

ELV's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CI (83). This means that ELV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIELV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ELV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBNB5.380.07
+1.32%
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.
FACT10.690.02
+0.19%
Fact II Acquisition Corp
ENB50.46-0.53
-1.04%
Enbridge
DFTX44.91-0.49
-1.08%
Definium Therapeutics Inc
AIXC1.12-0.05
-4.68%
AIxCrypto Holdings Inc.

CI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CI has been loosely correlated with CVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CI jumps, then CVS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CI
1D Price
Change %
CI100%
+1.13%
CVS - CI
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
ELV - CI
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
CNC - CI
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
HUM - CI
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
UNH - CI
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
More

ELV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELV has been loosely correlated with UNH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELV jumps, then UNH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELV
1D Price
Change %
ELV100%
+1.07%
UNH - ELV
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
CNC - ELV
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
CVS - ELV
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
MOH - ELV
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
HUM - ELV
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
More