Advertisement
CINF vs UFCS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINF is a Hold and UFCS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CINF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CINF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CINF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CINF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- UFCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CINF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.77% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +5.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
CINF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
UFCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.87% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| CINF | UFCS | CINF / UFCS | |
| Capitalization | 24.1B | 779M | 3,094% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.565 | 8.603 | 100% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.36 | 8.70 | 153% |
| Revenue | 11.7B | 1.29B | 909% |
| Total Cash | 2.18B | 184M | 1,183% |
| Total Debt | 884M | 117M | 756% |
CINF | UFCS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 49 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UFCS's Valuation (44) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (50). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.
CINF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UFCS (69). This means that CINF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.
CINF's SMR Rating (77) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (77). This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.
CINF's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (43). This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.
CINF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for UFCS (89). This means that CINF’s stock grew significantly faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.
| CINF | UFCS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 52% | 15 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 59% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PGP | 8.41 | 0.02 | +0.24% |
| PIMCO Global StockPLUS & Income Fund | |||
| QXQ | 29.92 | N/A | -0.01% |
| SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF | |||
| GNMA | 43.81 | -0.04 | -0.10% |
| iShares GNMA Bond ETF | |||
| EVT | 24.21 | -0.05 | -0.21% |
| Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund | |||
| ITDI | 35.73 | -0.08 | -0.23% |
| iShares LifePath Target Date 2065 ETF | |||
CINF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CINF has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CINF jumps, then L could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CINF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CINF | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| L - CINF | 84% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| ORI - CINF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| HIG - CINF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| THG - CINF | 76% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| CNA - CINF | 76% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||
UFCS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UFCS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFCS | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| SAFT - UFCS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| CINF - UFCS | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| L - UFCS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| AIZ - UFCS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| ORI - UFCS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||