CINF
Price
$146.17
Change
-$3.21 (-2.15%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
19.46B
21 days until earnings call
UFCS
Price
$27.63
Change
-$0.74 (-2.61%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
550.29M
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CINF vs UFCS

Header iconCINF vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts CINF vs UFCSBanner chart's image
Cincinnati Financial
Price$146.17
Change-$3.21 (-2.15%)
Volume$6.02K
Capitalization19.46B
United Fire Group
Price$27.63
Change-$0.74 (-2.61%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization550.29M
CINF vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINF vs. UFCS commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINF is a StrongBuy and UFCS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CINF: $149.38 vs. UFCS: $28.37)
Brand notoriety: CINF and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINF: 99% vs. UFCS: 99%
Market capitalization -- CINF: $19.46B vs. UFCS: $550.29M
CINF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $19.46B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $550.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CINF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CINF is a better buy in the long-term than UFCS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CINF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CINF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CINF is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

CINF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.83% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

CINF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.75% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CINF($19.5B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($550M). UFCS has higher P/E ratio than CINF: UFCS (41.53) vs CINF (10.48). CINF YTD gains are higher at: 5.206 vs. UFCS (0.853). CINF has more cash in the bank: 14.7B vs. UFCS (102M). UFCS has less debt than CINF: UFCS (50M) vs CINF (874M). CINF has higher revenues than UFCS: CINF (10B) vs UFCS (1.1B).
CINFUFCSCINF / UFCS
Capitalization19.5B550M3,545%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.2060.853610%
P/E Ratio10.4841.5325%
Revenue10B1.1B911%
Total Cash14.7B102M14,412%
Total Debt874M50M1,748%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINF vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
CINF
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7121
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1882
SMR RATING
1..100
8979
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
970
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UFCS's Valuation (43) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (52). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.

CINF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UFCS (82). This means that CINF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (79) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (89). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (51). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.

CINF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UFCS (70). This means that CINF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CINFUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSIQX11.83N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq I
HRLVX22.48N/A
N/A
Harbor Large Cap Value Admin
VVOIX22.40N/A
N/A
Invesco Value Opportunities Y
GMCUX16.45N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity R6
UIVIX12.61N/A
N/A
MFS Intrinsic Value I

CINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CINF has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CINF jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINF
1D Price
Change %
CINF100%
+0.31%
L - CINF
84%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
CNA - CINF
79%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
THG - CINF
77%
Closely correlated
-1.48%
HIG - CINF
77%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
TRV - CINF
76%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
-1.15%
SAFT - UFCS
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
CINF - UFCS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
L - UFCS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
AFG - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
THG - UFCS
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
More