CJPRF
Price
$16.67
Change
-$3.83 (-18.68%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
20.18B
WAB
Price
$170.93
Change
+$1.22 (+0.72%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
29.22B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CJPRF vs WAB

Header iconCJPRF vs WAB Comparison
Open Charts CJPRF vs WABBanner chart's image
Central Japan Railway
Price$16.67
Change-$3.83 (-18.68%)
Volume$2
Capitalization20.18B
Wabtec
Price$170.93
Change+$1.22 (+0.72%)
Volume$927.51K
Capitalization29.22B
CJPRF vs WAB Comparison Chart
Loading...
WAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CJPRF vs. WAB commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CJPRF is a Hold and WAB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CJPRF: $16.67 vs. WAB: $170.93)
Brand notoriety: CJPRF and WAB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Railroads industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CJPRF: 5% vs. WAB: 71%
Market capitalization -- CJPRF: $20.18B vs. WAB: $29.22B
CJPRF [@Railroads] is valued at $20.18B. WAB’s [@Railroads] market capitalization is $29.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Railroads] industry ranges from $132.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Railroads] industry is $15.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CJPRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWAB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CJPRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WAB is a better buy in the long-term than CJPRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WAB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WAB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CJPRF (@Railroads) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WAB (@Railroads) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was +3.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

WAB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Railroads (+3.45% weekly)

The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WAB($29.2B) has a higher market cap than CJPRF($20.2B). WAB has higher P/E ratio than CJPRF: WAB (28.30) vs CJPRF (5.31). WAB YTD gains are higher at: -9.725 vs. CJPRF (-18.683). CJPRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 892B vs. WAB (2.07B). CJPRF has more cash in the bank: 647B vs. WAB (706M). WAB has less debt than CJPRF: WAB (3.98B) vs CJPRF (4.37T). CJPRF has higher revenues than WAB: CJPRF (1.77T) vs WAB (10.4B).
CJPRFWABCJPRF / WAB
Capitalization20.2B29.2B69%
EBITDA892B2.07B43,092%
Gain YTD-18.683-9.725192%
P/E Ratio5.3128.3019%
Revenue1.77T10.4B16,990%
Total Cash647B706M91,643%
Total Debt4.37T3.98B109,849%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CJPRF vs WAB: Fundamental Ratings
CJPRF
WAB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9872
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
10068
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9158
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CJPRF's Valuation (87) in the null industry is in the same range as WAB (91) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that CJPRF’s stock grew similarly to WAB’s over the last 12 months.

WAB's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for CJPRF (100) in the null industry. This means that WAB’s stock grew significantly faster than CJPRF’s over the last 12 months.

WAB's SMR Rating (68) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as CJPRF (100) in the null industry. This means that WAB’s stock grew similarly to CJPRF’s over the last 12 months.

WAB's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as CJPRF (84) in the null industry. This means that WAB’s stock grew similarly to CJPRF’s over the last 12 months.

WAB's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CJPRF (91) in the null industry. This means that WAB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CJPRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WAB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EELV24.150.19
+0.79%
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Vol ETF
FLQL53.520.26
+0.49%
Franklin US Large Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
AUDEUR0.56N/A
N/A
Australian Dollar - Euro
CHFHKD9.54N/A
N/A
Switzerland Franc - Hong Kong Dollar
GBPCAD1.83N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - Canadian Dollar

CJPRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CJPRF and WJRYF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CJPRF and WJRYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CJPRF
1D Price
Change %
CJPRF100%
N/A
WJRYF - CJPRF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRYCY - CJPRF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CJPRY - CJPRF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
EJPRF - CJPRF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WAB - CJPRF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
More

WAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAB has been loosely correlated with TRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WAB jumps, then TRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAB
1D Price
Change %
WAB100%
+0.72%
TRN - WAB
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
GBX - WAB
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
UNP - WAB
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
FSTR - WAB
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
NSC - WAB
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
More