NSC
Price
$335.48
Change
+$1.55 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
75.35B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WAB
Price
$290.86
Change
-$1.60 (-0.55%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
49.13B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSC vs WAB

NSC vs WAB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Norfolk Southern (NSC) vs. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • NSC is a leading Eastern U.S. freight railroad facing volume headwinds in intermodal and coal segments, partially offset by cost discipline and merchandise strength.
  • WAB delivered full-year 2025 adjusted EPS (earnings per share) growth of nearly 19%, underpinned by a record $27 billion multi-year backlog and strategic acquisitions.
  • NSC's pending merger with Union Pacific presents a transformative but uncertain catalyst, while WAB is executing on organic and M&A-driven (mergers and acquisitions) growth.
  • WAB exhibits stronger top-line momentum with 14.8% year-over-year sales growth in Q4 2025, compared to NSC's 1.7% revenue decline in the same period.
  • Both companies operate in the rail transportation ecosystem but serve fundamentally different roles: NSC is a pure-play railroad operator, while WAB is a diversified rail equipment and technology provider.
  • WAB's five-year streak of high-teens adjusted EPS growth contrasts with NSC's more cyclical, cost-efficiency-driven earnings profile.

Introduction

Investors tracking the rail and transportation sector often encounter two prominent names that represent distinct ends of the industry spectrum: NSC (Norfolk Southern Corporation), a Class I freight railroad operating across the Eastern United States, and WAB (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, commonly known as Wabtec), a global leader in rail equipment, digital solutions, and transit systems. While both companies are tethered to the health of rail transportation, their business models, growth drivers, and risk profiles diverge significantly. This comparison is relevant for traders and longer-term investors seeking to understand which vehicle may be better positioned amid evolving macroeconomic conditions, shifting freight demand, and ongoing infrastructure investment trends.

NSC Overview and Recent Performance

Norfolk Southern operates approximately 19,200 route miles across 22 U.S. states, forming one of the country's most extensive intermodal (multi-mode freight transport) networks with connections to every major Atlantic coast container port. The company generates revenue primarily from merchandise freight — spanning chemicals, metals, agriculture, and automotive products — and intermodal shipments. In recent weeks, NSC has navigated a challenging demand environment. Full-year 2025 railway operating revenues reached $12.2 billion, essentially flat year-over-year, while adjusted diluted EPS rose roughly 5% to $12.49. The company exceeded its productivity savings target, capturing over $215 million in annual cost reductions. However, Q4 2025 revenue declined 1.7% year-over-year to $2.97 billion, pressured by a 7% drop in intermodal volumes and an 11% decline in coal revenue tied to weak seaborne pricing. Merchandise revenue showed relative resilience, rising 2% in the same period. A transformative development has dominated sentiment: NSC's announced merger with Union Pacific, which would create America's first transcontinental railroad. The deal implies a value of approximately $320 per NSC share, though regulatory approval remains a significant variable. Management has acknowledged near-term competitive pressures and macroeconomic uncertainty while guiding 2026 capital expenditures down 14% to $1.9 billion.

WAB Overview and Recent Performance

Wabtec is a diversified rail technology and equipment company serving both freight and transit markets globally. Its portfolio spans locomotive manufacturing, modernization services, digital train inspection systems, braking components, and transit solutions. Unlike a pure-play railroad, WAB's revenue is tied to global rail capital expenditure cycles, fleet renewal programs, and infrastructure investment, giving it a different risk-return profile. Recent performance has been notably strong: full-year 2025 sales reached $11.17 billion, up 7.5% year-over-year, while adjusted diluted EPS surged 18.7% to $8.97 — marking the fifth consecutive year of high-teens adjusted EPS growth. In Q4 2025, sales jumped 14.8% to $2.97 billion, driven by equipment deliveries and contributions from acquisitions including Inspection Technologies and Frauscher Sensor Technology. The company's multi-year backlog reached a record $27 billion, up 23% versus the prior year, providing substantial revenue visibility. Strategic M&A has been a hallmark of recent activity, with over $3.5 billion committed to acquisitions expected to be accretive to earnings. WAB's board also raised the quarterly dividend by 24% and expanded share buyback authorization to $1.2 billion. For 2026, management guided adjusted EPS to a range of $10.05 to $10.45, implying approximately 14% growth at the midpoint.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment where data-driven decision-making has become essential, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most effective AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of tickers, yet only those that demonstrate the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn placement in this featured section. These bots employ diverse trading styles — from swing trading and trend-following to breakout-based and deep trend analysis strategies — across timeframes ranging from 5-minute to daily intervals. Performance statistics vary widely: some bots have shown annualized returns exceeding 70% in select sectors, while others prioritize consistency with win rates approaching 90% in categories such as industrial and infrastructure stocks. Each bot carries distinct statistics on Sharpe ratio, drawdown, trade frequency, and sector exposure, enabling users to match strategies to their own risk preferences. Explore the full roster of top-performing bots by visiting the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business Model: NSC is a railroad operator — an asset-heavy, network-driven business where profitability hinges on volume, pricing, and operating ratio (operating expenses as a percentage of revenue, where lower is better). WAB is a manufacturer and technology provider, earning revenue from equipment sales, aftermarket services, and digital solutions, with growth tied to global fleet investment and modernization cycles.

Growth Drivers: WAB benefits from multiple secular tailwinds: aging locomotive fleets requiring modernization, international infrastructure expansion (including a $4.2 billion Kazakhstan locomotive order), and digitalization of rail safety systems. NSC's growth is more cyclical, tied to U.S. industrial activity, consumer goods movement, and coal demand — the latter of which faces structural headwinds.

Recent Momentum: WAB has clearly outpaced NSC in recent quarters. WAB grew Q4 2025 sales by 14.8% and raised forward guidance, while NSC experienced a 1.7% revenue contraction and faces competitive share losses in intermodal. WAB's record backlog provides multi-year visibility; NSC's outlook remains clouded by tariff uncertainty, trucking competition, and soft freight demand.

Risk Factors: NSC's pending merger introduces binary regulatory risk — approval could unlock significant value, while rejection or prolonged review could weigh on sentiment. WAB faces integration risk from its active M&A strategy and tariff exposure on imported components, though management has outlined mitigation plans including supply chain reconfiguration.

Capital Allocation: Both companies return capital to shareholders, but WAB has been more aggressive, pairing a 24% dividend increase with an expanded $1.2 billion buyback authorization. NSC is prioritizing balance sheet strength and reduced capital spending amid merger-related uncertainty.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, growth trajectory, and backlog visibility, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely favor WAB in the current market environment. WAB's combination of accelerating revenue growth, record backlog providing multi-year earnings visibility, a five-year track record of high-teens adjusted EPS expansion, and a diversified global revenue base offers a more consistent and predictable pattern than NSC's current profile. While NSC's merger catalyst could prove transformative if approved, the near-term picture is marked by volume softness, competitive pressures, and regulatory uncertainty — factors that introduce volatility into trend signals. WAB's continued margin expansion, disciplined M&A integration, and broad-based demand across freight and transit segments present a steadier, growth-oriented thesis. Probabilistically, the AI would likely prioritize the stock with stronger momentum, higher forecasted earnings growth, and a more diversified set of demand drivers — all of which currently point toward WAB.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NSC vs. WAB commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSC is a Hold and WAB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (NSC: $335.48 vs. WAB: $290.86)
Brand notoriety: NSC: Notable vs. WAB: Not notable
Both companies represent the Railroads industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSC: 124% vs. WAB: 100%
Market capitalization -- NSC: $75.35B vs. WAB: $49.13B
NSC [@Railroads] is valued at $75.35B. WAB’s [@Railroads] market capitalization is $49.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Railroads] industry ranges from $173.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Railroads] industry is $45.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWAB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WAB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NSC is a better buy in the long-term than WAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WAB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WAB is a better buy in the short-term than NSC.

Price Growth

NSC (@Railroads) experienced а -4.33% price change this week, while WAB (@Railroads) price change was -3.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

NSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

WAB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Railroads (-4.57% weekly)

The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSC($75.4B) has a higher market cap than WAB($49.1B). WAB has higher P/E ratio than NSC: WAB (39.15) vs NSC (28.62). WAB YTD gains are higher at: 36.597 vs. NSC (17.214). NSC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.56B vs. WAB (2.49B). NSC has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. WAB (670M). WAB has less debt than NSC: WAB (6.57B) vs NSC (16.6B). NSC (12.5B) and WAB (12B) have equivalent revenues.
NSCWABNSC / WAB
Capitalization75.4B49.1B154%
EBITDA5.56B2.49B223%
Gain YTD17.21436.59747%
P/E Ratio28.6239.1573%
Revenue12.5B12B104%
Total Cash1.07B670M160%
Total Debt16.6B6.57B253%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSC vs WAB: Fundamental Ratings
NSC
WAB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8727
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
504
SMR RATING
1..100
5267
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2810
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1722
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NSC's Valuation (86) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as WAB (90) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that NSC’s stock grew similarly to WAB’s over the last 12 months.

WAB's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSC (50) in the Railroads industry. This means that WAB’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSC’s over the last 12 months.

NSC's SMR Rating (52) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as WAB (67) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that NSC’s stock grew similarly to WAB’s over the last 12 months.

WAB's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as NSC (28) in the Railroads industry. This means that WAB’s stock grew similarly to NSC’s over the last 12 months.

NSC's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as WAB (22) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that NSC’s stock grew similarly to WAB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSCWAB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAIN1.430.03
+2.14%
RAIN ENHANCEMENT TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO INC
CIGI98.55-0.83
-0.84%
Colliers International Group
RELX35.42-1.19
-3.25%
Relx PLC
AIFU34.56-1.21
-3.38%
AIFU Inc
ANRO27.07-1.56
-5.45%
Alto Neuroscience

NSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSC has been closely correlated with UNP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NSC jumps, then UNP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSC
1D Price
Change %
NSC100%
+0.46%
UNP - NSC
94%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
CSX - NSC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
CNI - NSC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
CP - NSC
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
WAB - NSC
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
More

WAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAB has been loosely correlated with UNP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WAB jumps, then UNP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAB
1D Price
Change %
WAB100%
-0.55%
UNP - WAB
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
GBX - WAB
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
CP - WAB
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
CSX - WAB
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
NSC - WAB
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
More