Advertisement
CLMB vs IZM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLMB is a StrongBuy and IZM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLMB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIZM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLMB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- IZM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLMB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IZM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLMB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- IZM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CLMB (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while IZM (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) price change was +3.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliance Stores industry was +1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLMB is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics/Appliance Stores (+1.54% weekly)The electronics/appliance stores industry includes companies that sell consumer electronics such as computers, stereo components, software, TVs, and appliances such as those for cooking and cleaning. Some companies also operate stores that rent and sell pre-recorded CDs and DVDs. Best Buy Co., Inc., Conn’s, Inc., Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores Inc. and Trans World Entertainment Corp. are some of the largest companies in this space.
| CLMB | IZM | CLMB / IZM | |
| Capitalization | 510M | 2.88M | 17,684% |
| EBITDA | 37.4M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.337 | -90.787 | -9% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.64 | 2.40 | 1,027% |
| Revenue | 712M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 56.6M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.05M | N/A | - |
CLMB | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CLMB | IZM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 63% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
CLMB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLMB and CNXN have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLMB and CNXN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLMB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLMB | 100% | -4.56% | ||
| CNXN - CLMB | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
| SCSC - CLMB | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| SNX - CLMB | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
| ARW - CLMB | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| AVT - CLMB | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||
IZM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IZM and SCSC have been poorly correlated (+-2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IZM and SCSC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IZM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IZM | 100% | -3.66% | ||
| SCSC - IZM | -2% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
| CLMB - IZM | -3% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
| AVT - IZM | -4% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| NSIT - IZM | -6% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
| SNX - IZM | -9% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||