CLSK
Price
$10.63
Change
-$0.89 (-7.73%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.43B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FOUR
Price
$39.52
Change
+$0.53 (+1.36%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.92B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs FOUR

CLSK vs FOUR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. FOUR commentary
Oct 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a StrongBuy and FOUR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK vs FOUR: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
FOUR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6125
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9884
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6180
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
847
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOUR's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (85). This means that FOUR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

FOUR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (100). This means that FOUR’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

FOUR's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (98). This means that FOUR’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as FOUR (80). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to FOUR’s over the last 12 months.

FOUR's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLSK (84). This means that FOUR’s stock grew significantly faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKFOUR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2026
Stock price -- (CLSK: $10.63 vs. FOUR: $39.52)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and FOUR are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while FOUR is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 148% vs. FOUR: 110%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $3.43B vs. FOUR: $2.92B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.43B. FOUR’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $590 to $304.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $48.8K to $3.78T. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.69B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $35.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while FOUR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FOUR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOUR is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOUR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FOUR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOUR is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -15.10% price change this week, while FOUR (@Computer Communications) price change was +11.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.23%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2026.

FOUR is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.90% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Computer Communications (-0.36% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FOUR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADBG3.750.25
+7.14%
Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG)
FMCX36.49N/A
N/A
FM Focus Equity ETF (FMCX)
EELV27.92-0.09
-0.32%
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV)
VGRO25.81-0.37
-1.40%
Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF (VGRO)
EMGF70.50-1.49
-2.07%
iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF (EMGF)

FOUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOUR has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOUR jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOUR
1D Price
Change %
FOUR100%
+1.36%
COIN - FOUR
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
EEFT - FOUR
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
RIOT - FOUR
51%
Loosely correlated
-9.17%
CLSK - FOUR
50%
Loosely correlated
-7.73%
AFRM - FOUR
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
More