Advertisement
CLSK vs GRAB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) vs. Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CLSK and GRAB have delivered strong year-to-date gains around 27%, outperforming broader markets in recent months.
- CLSK, a Bitcoin mining firm pivoting to AI infrastructure, shows high volatility (beta of 3.54) tied to cryptocurrency trends.
- GRAB, Southeast Asia's leading superapp, achieved its first full year of profitability with steady revenue growth.
- GRAB offers lower risk with a beta of 1.00 and positive EPS (earnings per share), contrasting CLSK's projected earnings declines.
- Market caps differ significantly: GRAB at $14.7 billion vs. CLSK at $3.28 billion.
- Tickeron's AI bots highlight opportunities in data centers and semiconductors, relevant to CLSK's pivot.
Introduction
This stock comparison between CLSK and GRAB examines two growth-oriented companies in distinct sectors: cryptocurrency infrastructure and Southeast Asian digital services. Traders seeking high-upside plays may eye CLSK's volatility, while investors prioritizing stability might prefer GRAB's profitability milestone. Amid recent market activity, both stocks have shown resilience, offering insights into relative performance, sector risks, and momentum for diversified portfolios. This analysis aids in understanding their positioning in today's dynamic environment.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) operates as a Bitcoin mining company, owning and managing data centers across the Americas to mine the digital asset. The firm is expanding its infrastructure for potential AI and high-performance computing (HPC) applications. In recent market activity, CLSK shares have exhibited volatility, with a year-to-date gain of 26.78% and a 52-week range from $7.82 to $23.61. Recent operational updates highlighted strong Bitcoin production, such as 658 BTC in March, amid a pivot to hyperscale data centers. However, sentiment has been pressured by Bitcoin price fluctuations and analyst projections of significant EPS declines and revenue drops, leading to dips even as broader markets rose. High beta (3.54, a measure of volatility relative to the market) underscores its sensitivity to crypto trends.
GRAB Overview and Recent Performance
Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) runs Southeast Asia's leading superapp, providing ride-hailing, food delivery, digital payments, and financial services across eight countries. Recent quarters marked its first year of net profitability, with 19% Q4 revenue growth and initiatives like share buybacks signaling confidence. Shares have risen 28.16% year-to-date, trading in a 52-week range of $3.48 to $6.62, with a market cap of $14.7 billion. Performance in recent weeks has been mixed, with gains on strong days outpacing the S&P 500 but occasional dips amid earnings anticipation. Positive analyst coverage and expansion in quick commerce and financial services have bolstered sentiment, supported by a moderate PE ratio (price-to-earnings, 59.75) and beta of 1.00.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from over 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and asset classes. Only 25 bots earn a spot based on current market suitability, featuring annualized returns ranging from 24% to 164%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Examples include "Semiconductor Manufacturing" (97.97% annualized return, 63% win rate on tickers like LRCX and NVDA) and "Data Centers" bots (51-71% returns on APLD, GDS). These vary from 5-minute scalps to 60-minute swings, emphasizing sectors like AI infrastructure and semis. Traders can explore these high-conviction signals tailored to prevailing conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CLSK and GRAB diverge sharply in business models: CLSK relies on energy-intensive Bitcoin mining and nascent AI data centers, exposing it to crypto volatility and power costs, while GRAB leverages a consumer superapp ecosystem for recurring revenue from mobility, deliveries, and fintech. Growth drivers contrast too—CLSK tied to Bitcoin halving cycles and AI demand, versus GRAB's regional dominance and profitability inflection. Recent momentum favors GRAB's steadier uptrend, with lower risk from its balanced beta versus CLSK's swings. Sector exposure pits crypto/AI hype against emerging market tech stability, with GRAB showing stronger sentiment via buybacks and upgrades.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward GRAB due to its trend consistency, recent profitability, and lower volatility amid uncertain crypto markets. Observable catalysts like revenue growth and share repurchases position it favorably relative to CLSK's exposure to Bitcoin headwinds, though CLSK could surge on AI infrastructure momentum. This probabilistic edge reflects current relative stability over speculative upside.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and GRAB is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GRAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRAB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- GRAB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.90% price change this week, while GRAB (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.61%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
GRAB is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.25% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Packaged Software (-1.58% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CLSK | GRAB | CLSK / GRAB | |
| Capitalization | 4.48B | 14.3B | 31% |
| EBITDA | -69.3M | 657M | -11% |
| Gain YTD | 72.579 | -30.060 | -241% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 87.25 | 8% |
| Revenue | 740M | 3.55B | 21% |
| Total Cash | 935M | 6.26B | 15% |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 1.95B | 92% |
CLSK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CLSK | GRAB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 88% | 14 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XHS | 122.14 | 0.13 | +0.11% |
| Stt Strt® SPDR® S&P®HlthCrSvcsETF | |||
| SPSB | 29.93 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| State Street® SPDR® S/t Corp Bd ETF | |||
| GRPM | 126.59 | -0.45 | -0.35% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | |||
| SCEP | 24.97 | -0.10 | -0.40% |
| Sterling Capital Hedged Eq Prm Inc ETF | |||
| SDP | 22.21 | -0.28 | -1.26% |
| ProShares UltraShort Utilities | |||
GRAB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRAB has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRAB jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRAB | 100% | -2.24% | ||
| COIN - GRAB | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| RIOT - GRAB | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| CLSK - GRAB | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| UBER - GRAB | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| COMP - GRAB | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
More | ||||