CLSK
Price
$9.47
Change
-$0.08 (-0.84%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.66B
109 days until earnings call
TTWO
Price
$233.27
Change
-$1.63 (-0.69%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
43.03B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs TTWO

Header iconCLSK vs TTWO Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs TTWOBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$9.47
Change-$0.08 (-0.84%)
Volume$17.1M
Capitalization2.66B
Take-Two Interactive Software
Price$233.27
Change-$1.63 (-0.69%)
Volume$989.05K
Capitalization43.03B
CLSK vs TTWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. TTWO commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and TTWO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $9.47 vs. TTWO: $233.27)
Brand notoriety: CLSK: Not notable vs. TTWO: Notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while TTWO is part of the Electronics/Appliances industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 76% vs. TTWO: 56%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $2.66B vs. TTWO: $43.03B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.66B. TTWO’s [@Electronics/Appliances] market capitalization is $43.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $12.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTWO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TTWO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTWO is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than TTWO.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.56% price change this week, while TTWO (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was +1.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.65%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

TTWO is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.83% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Electronics/Appliances (+2.22% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TTWO($43B) has a higher market cap than CLSK($2.66B). TTWO YTD gains are higher at: 26.722 vs. CLSK (2.823). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 626M vs. TTWO (-2.87B). TTWO has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. CLSK (916M). CLSK has less debt than TTWO: CLSK (820M) vs TTWO (3.51B). TTWO has higher revenues than CLSK: TTWO (5.8B) vs CLSK (632M).
CLSKTTWOCLSK / TTWO
Capitalization2.66B43B6%
EBITDA626M-2.87B-22%
Gain YTD2.82326.72211%
P/E Ratio11.01N/A-
Revenue632M5.8B11%
Total Cash916M2.04B45%
Total Debt820M3.51B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK vs TTWO: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
TTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
549
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9267
SMR RATING
1..100
5199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6121
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5812
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLSK's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (95) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as CLSK (92) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTWO (99) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TTWO's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (61) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

TTWO's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (58) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKTTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYTNX372.31N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy H
TILIX75.44N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx R6
CGVIX15.20N/A
N/A
Causeway Global Value Inst
AWMIX20.95N/A
N/A
CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Institutional
RIVIX19.45-0.11
-0.56%
American Funds International Vntg R-3

TTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then NET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTWO
1D Price
Change %
TTWO100%
-0.69%
NET - TTWO
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
COIN - TTWO
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
PANW - TTWO
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
DOCS - TTWO
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
CLSK - TTWO
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
More