NET
Price
$264.44
Change
+$2.12 (+0.81%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:46 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
93.11B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTWO
Price
$231.76
Change
+$1.51 (+0.66%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
42.75B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NET vs TTWO

NET vs TTWO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cloudflare (NET) vs. Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Cloudflare (NET) has delivered exceptional momentum, with revenue accelerating to 34% year-over-year in Q4 2025 and the stock surging more than 40% year-to-date in 2026, fueled by AI-driven demand for its connectivity cloud platform.
  • Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) posted record net bookings in its most recent quarter, but profitability remains under pressure, and the highly anticipated Grand Theft Auto VI has been delayed to November 2026, creating a mixed near-term catalyst picture.
  • Cloudflare operates in the high-growth cybersecurity and edge-computing space with strong recurring revenue dynamics, while Take-Two is a content-driven video game publisher whose fortunes are closely tied to major release cycles.
  • Both stocks occupy different risk profiles: Cloudflare carries a premium valuation with a beta of 1.67, reflecting higher volatility, while Take-Two faces execution risk around its blockbuster pipeline and carries $3.07 billion in debt.
  • Institutional sentiment appears more uniformly bullish on Cloudflare, with the majority of sell-side analysts maintaining Buy or Strong Buy ratings, whereas Take-Two's outlook is more contingent on a single transformative product launch.

Introduction

Investors evaluating growth opportunities in the technology sector often encounter companies that, while both firmly in the "tech" universe, operate in dramatically different sub-industries. Cloudflare and Take-Two Interactive represent two such divergent paths: one is a cybersecurity and network infrastructure powerhouse riding the artificial intelligence wave, and the other is one of the world's largest video game publishers building toward a watershed product launch. Comparing these two names offers a useful lens through which to assess contrasting growth models, market dynamics, and risk-reward profiles. This stock comparison examines each company's recent performance, business fundamentals, and relative performance to help traders and investors better understand their market positioning in the current environment.

NET Overview and Recent Performance

Cloudflare (NET) is a leading connectivity cloud company that provides cybersecurity, content delivery, and edge-computing services to businesses worldwide. The company protects and accelerates websites, applications, and networks through a global infrastructure that spans hundreds of data centers. In recent months, Cloudflare has positioned itself as a critical enabler of the so-called "Agentic Internet," a term CEO Matthew Prince has used to describe the coming wave of autonomous AI agents traversing the web—agents that must pass through Cloudflare's network, creating a powerful demand flywheel.

The company's financial trajectory has been impressive. For the full fiscal year 2025, Cloudflare reported revenue of $2.17 billion, representing 30% year-over-year growth, with the fourth quarter alone delivering $614.5 million in revenue—a 34% increase. Non-GAAP (non-GAAP, or non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, meaning adjusted to exclude certain one-time and non-cash items) net income per diluted share reached $0.93 for the year, a meaningful improvement from $0.75 in fiscal 2024. The company generated $603.1 million in operating cash flow for the year and held $4.1 billion in cash and equivalents at year-end. In early 2026, Cloudflare closed its largest-ever contract by annual contract value—averaging $42.5 million per year—and grew total new annual contract value by nearly 50% year-over-year, its fastest rate since 2021.

Stock performance has reflected this momentum. After dipping to a 52-week low of $158.83 in February 2026 amid a broader software-sector sell-off, shares of NET recovered sharply and climbed to a 52-week high of $291.00 by mid-July 2026. The stock's beta of 1.67 indicates above-average volatility, meaning it tends to amplify broader market moves in both directions. Analyst coverage remains broadly favorable, with a consensus Buy rating and price targets reflecting confidence in the company's long-term growth narrative, even as the forward price-to-earnings ratio remains elevated by conventional standards.

TTWO Overview and Recent Performance

Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) is a global video game publisher best known for flagship franchises including Grand Theft Auto, NBA 2K, Red Dead Redemption, and—via its Zynga subsidiary—an extensive mobile gaming portfolio that includes titles such as Toon Blast, Match Factory!, and Words With Friends. The company generates revenue through game sales and, increasingly, through recurrent consumer spending (in-game purchases, virtual currency, and downloadable content), which now accounts for roughly 73% to 80% of total net bookings depending on the quarter.

Take-Two's recent financial reporting has been a study in contrasts. In its second quarter of fiscal 2026 (calendar Q3 2025), the company delivered record net bookings of $1.96 billion, handily surpassing its guidance range of $1.70 to $1.75 billion. NBA 2K grew by 45%, Mafia: The Old Country performed well, and recurrent consumer spending rose 20% year-over-year. Management raised its full-year net bookings guidance to $6.40 to $6.50 billion. Yet profitability metrics lagged: the company posted a GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net loss of $134 million, or $0.73 per share, missing analyst expectations by a wide margin. Total debt stood at $3.07 billion as of September 2025.

The defining event for TTWO in recent months has been the announcement that Grand Theft Auto VI—arguably the most anticipated video game release in industry history—has been delayed by six months to November 19, 2026. Rockstar Games explained the delay as necessary to deliver the level of polish players expect. The stock initially dropped as much as 18% in after-hours trading on the news before recovering roughly half that loss. While the delay does not diminish the game's eventual commercial potential, it does push the expected revenue and earnings inflection point deeper into fiscal 2027, creating a waiting period that tests investor patience.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in navigating the complexities of stocks like Cloudflare and Take-Two Interactive, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn placement in this featured section. These bots employ diverse trading styles, strategies, and timeframes, with statistics that span a wide performance range—some bots have historically delivered double-digit annualized returns, while others focus on shorter-duration swing trades with higher-frequency signals. Each bot comes with a fully transparent track record, including win rates, trade history, and real-time performance metrics, allowing users to evaluate them based on their individual risk tolerance and trading objectives. Whether you are interested in long-term trend following or shorter tactical moves, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify systematic strategies attuned to today's market environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Putting Cloudflare and Take-Two side by side reveals fundamentally different investment theses. Cloudflare operates a platform business with strong recurring revenue characteristics, serving enterprise clients across industries. Its growth is tied to secular trends—rising cybersecurity threats, the proliferation of cloud-based workloads, and the emergence of AI agents—that are largely independent of any single product cycle. Revenue growth has been accelerating in recent quarters, and the company is approaching GAAP profitability, with non-GAAP profitability already well established.

Take-Two, by contrast, is a content-driven business where revenue surges are closely tied to major game releases. The company's near-term fortunes rest heavily on the successful launch of Grand Theft Auto VI, now scheduled for November 2026. While the existing portfolio of live-service games—particularly NBA 2K and Zynga's mobile titles—provides a steady baseline of recurrent consumer spending, the magnitude of the GTA VI catalyst dwarfs everything else. This creates a binary risk-reward profile: a successful launch could establish a new financial baseline for years to come, but any further delays or execution missteps would likely weigh heavily on the stock.

On financial health, Cloudflare holds a stronger balance sheet with $4.1 billion in cash and no debt, while Take-Two carries net debt and has been generating negative GAAP earnings. On valuation, Cloudflare trades at a substantial premium to sales and forward earnings, reflecting its growth trajectory, whereas Take-Two's current valuation embeds expectations for a transformative revenue event that has not yet materialized. Sector exposure also differs meaningfully: Cloudflare is levered to enterprise IT spending and cybersecurity budgets, while Take-Two depends on consumer discretionary spending and entertainment trends.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, revenue momentum, balance sheet strength, and the dispersion of catalysts, Tickeron's AI system would likely favor NET over TTWO in the current market environment. Cloudflare's accelerating top-line growth, expanding non-GAAP profitability, robust free cash flow generation, and secular AI tailwinds present a more consistent and diversified growth narrative. Take-Two's thesis, while potentially transformative, remains heavily concentrated around a single product launch now six months further away than previously expected, with ongoing GAAP losses and elevated operating expenses clouding the near-term picture. That said, an AI-driven assessment is probabilistic by nature and does not preclude the possibility that Take-Two's risk-reward could become more compelling as the GTA VI launch date approaches. The relative positioning of these two stocks illustrates how systematic, data-oriented analysis can help investors weigh competing opportunities across different segments of the technology landscape.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NET vs. TTWO commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NET is a Buy and TTWO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (NET: $262.32 vs. TTWO: $230.25)
Brand notoriety: NET: Not notable vs. TTWO: Notable
NET represents the Computer Communications, while TTWO is part of the Electronics/Appliances industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NET: 65% vs. TTWO: 31%
Market capitalization -- NET: $93.11B vs. TTWO: $42.75B
NET [@Computer Communications] is valued at $93.11B. TTWO’s [@Electronics/Appliances] market capitalization is $42.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $2.83T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $28.38B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $11.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NET’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTWO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NET’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TTWO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NET and TTWO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NET’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NET’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTWO is a better buy in the short-term than NET.

Price Growth

NET (@Computer Communications) experienced а -3.72% price change this week, while TTWO (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -3.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.72%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -2.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

NET is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

TTWO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-4.33% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Electronics/Appliances (-2.97% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NET($93.1B) has a higher market cap than TTWO($42.7B). NET YTD gains are higher at: 33.056 vs. TTWO (-10.069). TTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.24B vs. NET (138M). NET has more cash in the bank: 4.16B vs. TTWO (1.99B). TTWO has less debt than NET: TTWO (2.96B) vs NET (3.53B). TTWO has higher revenues than NET: TTWO (6.66B) vs NET (2.33B).
NETTTWONET / TTWO
Capitalization93.1B42.7B218%
EBITDA138M1.24B11%
Gain YTD33.056-10.069-328%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue2.33B6.66B35%
Total Cash4.16B1.99B209%
Total Debt3.53B2.96B119%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NET vs TTWO: Fundamental Ratings
NET
TTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8360
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5368
SMR RATING
1..100
9495
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10014
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NET's Valuation (91) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (97) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that NET’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

NET's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (68) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that NET’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

NET's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (95) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that NET’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

NET's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (53) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that NET’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TTWO's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for NET (100) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew significantly faster than NET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NETTTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMLP27.440.17
+0.62%
Dorchester Minerals LP
OWL9.210.05
+0.55%
Blue Owl Capital
FACT10.64N/A
N/A
Fact II Acquisition Corp
ASPC10.68-0.09
-0.84%
A Spac III Acquisition Corp
SPGI420.00-9.06
-2.11%
S&P Global

NET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NET has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NET jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NET
1D Price
Change %
NET100%
-2.48%
COIN - NET
66%
Closely correlated
-2.99%
CLSK - NET
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
AFRM - NET
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.66%
SNOW - NET
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
HUBS - NET
59%
Loosely correlated
-7.27%
More

TTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then NET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTWO
1D Price
Change %
TTWO100%
-1.43%
NET - TTWO
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
COIN - TTWO
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.99%
PANW - TTWO
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.88%
DOCS - TTWO
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
CLSK - TTWO
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
More