Advertisement
CLSK vs TTWO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. Take-Two Interactive Software (TTWO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CleanSpark (CLSK) has evolved from a pure-play Bitcoin miner into a diversified digital infrastructure platform, now pursuing AI and high-performance computing (HPC) workloads alongside its core mining operations.
- Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) remains one of the world's leading video game publishers, with a portfolio anchored by blockbuster franchises and a growing mobile gaming segment that now generates roughly half of total net revenue.
- CLSK carries a beta of approximately 3.84, reflecting extreme sensitivity to cryptocurrency market swings, while TTWO's beta near 0.92 signals significantly lower systematic volatility and a more defensive growth profile.
- Wall Street analyst consensus rates both stocks favorably, but TTWO commands a far larger market capitalization (~$44 billion vs. ~$3.3 billion) and benefits from more diversified, recurring revenue streams.
- CLSK's year-to-date gain of roughly 29% contrasts with TTWO's roughly 8% year-to-date decline, though the two companies operate in fundamentally different industries with distinct risk-reward profiles.
Introduction
Comparing CLSK and TTWO may seem unconventional at first glance — one is a Bitcoin miner pivoting into AI infrastructure, the other is a video game publishing giant. Yet both stocks represent high-conviction plays on digital transformation and consumer technology, and both have drawn substantial analyst attention in recent months. This comparison is relevant for investors weighing high-beta, growth-oriented exposure against more established, franchise-driven businesses. Whether you are a momentum trader tracking sector rotations or a long-term investor evaluating relative market positioning, understanding how these two names stack up can inform a broader portfolio framework.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CLSK, operating as CleanSpark Inc. and branding itself as "America's Bitcoin Miner®," has undergone a significant strategic evolution in recent quarters. Once characterized as a pure-play Bitcoin mining operation, the company now describes itself as a market-leading data center developer, having expanded its mandate to include artificial intelligence and HPC (high-performance computing) workloads. The company closed fiscal year 2025 with revenues of $766.3 million, representing a 102% year-over-year increase, and reported full-year net income of $364.5 million. CleanSpark surpassed 50 EH/s (exahashes per second, a measure of mining computational power) in operational hashrate during mid-2025 and crossed the 1-gigawatt threshold in contracted power.
In recent months, a more complex picture has emerged. The company's most recently reported quarter showed revenue of $136.4 million, down roughly 25% from the prior-year period, alongside a net loss that widened considerably. Despite these headwinds, CLSK shares have posted a year-to-date gain of approximately 29%, reflecting optimism around the company's AI infrastructure ambitions. A landmark $1.15 billion zero-coupon convertible notes offering, closed in late 2025, provided capital to accelerate power portfolio expansion and share repurchases. Analyst sentiment remains broadly constructive, with price targets ranging from $16 to $26 and a consensus "Moderate Buy" rating. However, the stock's beta of roughly 3.84 underscores its extreme sensitivity to Bitcoin price fluctuations and broader risk appetite.
TTWO Overview and Recent Performance
TTWO, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., is one of the premier global developers and publishers of interactive entertainment. Through its Rockstar Games, 2K, and Zynga labels, the company controls some of the most valuable intellectual property in gaming, including the Grand Theft Auto, Red Dead Redemption, NBA 2K, and Borderlands franchises. The 2022 acquisition of Zynga deepened Take-Two's footprint in mobile gaming, which now accounts for roughly half of net revenue, while recurrent consumer spending — from virtual currency, add-on content, and in-game purchases — represents approximately 77% of total net bookings.
Take-Two's fiscal 2026 revenue reached $6.66 billion, an 18.2% increase from the prior year, with a quarterly revenue run rate exceeding $1.7 billion in its most recent reported period. Free cash flow has swung sharply positive, rising to $236.2 million in one recent quarter compared to a $48.2 million outflow a year earlier — a turnaround of nearly 590%. The company's earnings per share (EPS) remain negative on a trailing basis but have narrowed substantially as integration costs from acquisitions fade and operating leverage improves. Trading near $237 per share with a market capitalization of approximately $44 billion, TTWO carries a beta of about 0.92, indicating relatively muted sensitivity to broad market swings. Analyst coverage is overwhelmingly positive, with 25 of 28 covering analysts rating the stock a Buy or equivalent, and average price targets clustering around $262. The highly anticipated Grand Theft Auto VI release represents a significant potential catalyst that has shaped sentiment throughout the past year.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a data-driven edge beyond traditional fundamental analysis, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate shifting market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating consistently strong alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles — from short-term swing trading and momentum strategies to longer-duration trend-following approaches — and each bot maintains its own track record of performance statistics, win rates, and trade frequency. Some bots have historically achieved annualized returns in the double or even triple digits, though past performance is never a guarantee. By filtering for the most statistically robust and currently relevant bots, the Trending AI Robots section helps traders quickly identify algorithmically driven opportunities without manually sifting through hundreds of options. Exploring this page can provide a useful complement to any disciplined research process.
Head-to-Head Comparison
At the business-model level, these two companies could scarcely be more different. CleanSpark derives its value from energy infrastructure and digital asset production — its revenue is tightly coupled to Bitcoin prices, network hashrate difficulty, and power costs. Take-Two, by contrast, monetizes intellectual property through game sales, in-game transactions, and mobile advertising, with revenue streams that are far more recurring and diversified across platforms and geographies.
Growth drivers also diverge meaningfully. CLSK's expansion thesis now rests on converting its power and land portfolio into AI-ready data center capacity, a pivot that could generate higher-margin, contract-based revenue but remains in its early stages. TTWO's growth narrative revolves around its franchise release pipeline — most notably Grand Theft Auto VI — and the continued maturation of its mobile gaming ecosystem, particularly through Zynga's portfolio of "forever franchises."
Risk profiles present a stark contrast. CLSK's extreme beta and direct exposure to cryptocurrency volatility make it susceptible to sharp drawdowns during risk-off environments. The company also carries significant debt following its convertible notes issuance, though its Bitcoin treasury exceeds $1 billion, providing a substantial liquidity buffer. TTWO faces execution risk around major game releases and the inherent unpredictability of consumer entertainment spending, but its diversified revenue base and lower leverage to any single macroeconomic variable offer a comparatively smoother ride.
On market sentiment, both stocks maintain favorable analyst coverage, though TTWO's rating consensus is notably stronger in both breadth and conviction. CLSK's smaller market cap and higher volatility make it more of a tactical, momentum-sensitive instrument, while TTWO's institutional profile and lower beta appeal to investors seeking growth with tempered downside.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, stability metrics, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely favor TTWO in the current environment for investors prioritizing risk-adjusted returns and trend reliability. Take-Two's lower volatility profile, diversified and recurring revenue base, improving free cash flow trajectory, and concrete upcoming catalysts — particularly the Grand Theft Auto VI launch cycle — provide a more statistically stable foundation. CleanSpark's AI-driven infrastructure pivot is compelling and has fueled strong year-to-date appreciation, but the stock's extreme beta, recent quarterly earnings deterioration, and high sensitivity to cryptocurrency price swings introduce a level of unpredictability that tends to weigh against it in probabilistic, trend-oriented models. That said, for traders with higher risk tolerance and a bullish view on Bitcoin and AI infrastructure convergence, CLSK's momentum and strategic repositioning may continue to attract algorithmic interest under the right market conditions. The distinction ultimately reflects a trade-off between high-octane upside potential and steadier, franchise-backed growth.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and TTWO is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTWO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TTWO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +21.01% price change this week, while TTWO (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -3.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.77%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -2.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
TTWO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.85% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Electronics/Appliances (-2.97% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| CLSK | TTWO | CLSK / TTWO | |
| Capitalization | 4B | 42.7B | 9% |
| EBITDA | -69.3M | 1.24B | -6% |
| Gain YTD | 54.249 | -10.069 | -539% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 740M | 6.66B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 935M | 1.99B | 47% |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 2.96B | 61% |
CLSK | TTWO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (97) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as CLSK (100) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's SMR Rating (95) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as CLSK (99) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (53) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLSK (85) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew significantly faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | TTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 23 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CPSM | 29.28 | -0.05 | -0.16% |
| Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-May | |||
| IBIL | 24.72 | -0.06 | -0.25% |
| ishares Ibonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF | |||
| JLS | 17.34 | -0.09 | -0.52% |
| Nuveen Mortgage and Income Fund | |||
| PCQ | 8.58 | -0.12 | -1.38% |
| Pimco California Municipal Income Fund | |||
| SSO | 65.61 | -1.66 | -2.47% |
| ProShares Ultra S&P500 | |||
TTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then NET could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTWO | 100% | -1.43% | ||
| NET - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| COIN - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
| PANW - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| DOCS - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| CLSK - TTWO | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.86% | ||
More | ||||