Advertisement
CLSK vs TTWO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CLSK operates as a Bitcoin mining company and has shown strong year-to-date gains despite a recent earnings miss in fiscal Q2 2026.
- TTWO focuses on video game publishing with major titles like Grand Theft Auto and has maintained relatively stable performance amid content pipeline updates.
- Recent market activity highlights CLSK’s higher volatility tied to cryptocurrency prices compared to TTWO’s more defensive positioning in the entertainment sector.
- Both stocks have delivered positive returns over broader timeframes, yet CLSK exhibits greater sensitivity to operational metrics such as hashrate expansion.
- Market sentiment for CLSK reflects analyst optimism on infrastructure growth, while TTWO benefits from anticipated game launches despite timing adjustments.
- Relative performance indicates trade-offs between CLSK’s growth-oriented crypto exposure and TTWO’s established recurring revenue model.
Introduction
Investors and traders seeking to understand sector-specific dynamics often compare stocks with differing business models and risk profiles. CLSK and TTWO represent contrasting opportunities: one tied to digital asset mining and the other to interactive entertainment software. This comparison appeals to those evaluating momentum in technology-adjacent industries, portfolio diversification across cyclical and defensive assets, and relative performance in evolving market conditions. Traders monitoring short-term catalysts and long-term positioning may find the analysis particularly relevant for assessing allocation decisions.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) engages in Bitcoin mining operations across the Americas, emphasizing sustainable energy use and infrastructure expansion. In recent market activity, the stock has posted notable year-to-date gains exceeding 25 percent, driven by hashrate increases and operational updates released in early May 2026. Fiscal second-quarter results announced on May 11 showed revenue and earnings shortfalls relative to expectations, prompting a short-term price adjustment. Sentiment has been supported by continued focus on production growth and Bitcoin holdings amid broader cryptocurrency market movements. Over recent weeks, price behavior reflects the company’s exposure to digital asset volatility, with analysts maintaining constructive views on long-term capacity expansion.
TTWO Overview and Recent Performance
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) develops and publishes video games, including flagship franchises such as Grand Theft Auto. Recent market activity shows the stock trading near 242 dollars with modest year-to-date appreciation around 11 percent. Updates regarding release timelines for major titles, including adjustments to Grand Theft Auto VI, have influenced sentiment without derailing overall stability. The company’s recurring revenue from existing catalogs and ongoing content pipeline provide a buffer against single-product volatility. Over recent weeks, performance has remained relatively consistent compared with broader market indices, supported by steady analyst ratings and focus on upcoming product launches.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots drawn from hundreds available on the platform. These bots execute strategies across thousands of tickers using varied approaches, timeframes, and performance statistics. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in the trending section. Available bots exhibit a wide range of historical win rates, drawdowns, and return profiles, enabling users to match specific risk tolerances and trading styles. The section offers transparent metrics to help market participants explore automated solutions suited to current environments. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and configuration options.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CLSK and TTWO differ markedly in business models, with the former centered on energy-intensive Bitcoin mining and the latter on software development and intellectual property. Growth drivers for CLSK include hashrate expansion and cryptocurrency price trends, while TTWO relies on blockbuster game releases and catalog monetization. Recent momentum favors CLSK on a year-to-date basis yet introduces greater short-term swings, whereas TTWO demonstrates more measured movement amid content delays. Risk factors for CLSK encompass regulatory and energy-cost exposure; TTWO faces development timelines and competition within gaming. Sector positioning places CLSK in digital assets and TTWO in consumer discretionary entertainment, creating distinct market sentiment profiles.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modest edge to TTWO due to greater stability and clearer near-term catalysts from its content pipeline. CLSK shows promise through operational metrics but faces higher variability tied to external commodity influences. The assessment remains probabilistic and subject to evolving market data.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Buy and TTWO is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTWO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TTWO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- TTWO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -14.76% price change this week, while TTWO (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -4.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -6.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.84%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -4.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
TTWO is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-6.92% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Electronics/Appliances (-4.17% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| CLSK | TTWO | CLSK / TTWO | |
| Capitalization | 4B | 39.8B | 10% |
| EBITDA | -69.3M | 1.24B | -6% |
| Gain YTD | 54.051 | -16.264 | -332% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 740M | 6.66B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 935M | 1.99B | 47% |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 2.96B | 61% |
CLSK | TTWO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (97) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as CLSK (100) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's SMR Rating (95) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as CLSK (99) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (59) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLSK (86) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew significantly faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | TTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
TTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then NET could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTWO | 100% | -1.04% | ||
| NET - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | -6.90% | ||
| COIN - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| PANW - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| DOCS - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| CLSK - TTWO | 46% Loosely correlated | -7.09% | ||
More | ||||