Advertisement
CLSK vs TTWO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. Take-Two Interactive Software (TTWO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CLSK is a bitcoin miner transitioning into AI and high-performance computing (HPC) data centers, making its shares highly sensitive to cryptocurrency prices and execution risk.
- TTWO is a diversified video game publisher whose near-term story is anchored by the November 19, 2026 launch of Grand Theft Auto VI, a major revenue catalyst.
- Relative performance diverges sharply: CLSK has shown high volatility and wide losses, while TTWO has delivered steadier, catalyst-driven momentum and improving results.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: Based on trend consistency, stability, and a defined near-term catalyst, the AI favors TTWO over CLSK in the current market environment.
- For deeper context, review CLSK Major News and CLSK Today's Price Move, as well as TTWO Major News and TTWO Today's Price Move.
- Explore curated Trending AI Robots to see which automated strategies currently trade names like these.
Introduction
This stock comparison places CLSK, a bitcoin mining and digital infrastructure operator, alongside TTWO, one of the world's largest video game publishers. The two businesses occupy entirely different sectors, yet both are trading on forward-looking narratives that are reshaping their market positioning. CleanSpark is pivoting toward AI and HPC data center hosting, while Take-Two is building toward a flagship game release expected to reset its revenue trajectory. Growth-oriented and momentum-focused traders may weigh CleanSpark's higher risk-reward profile, while investors seeking a more defined catalyst and steadier fundamentals may find Take-Two's story more compelling. This analysis examines recent performance, sentiment, and the factors driving each name.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) operates energy-efficient bitcoin mining facilities across the United States and is actively expanding into AI and HPC data center development. In recent weeks, the company has emphasized a transition toward contracted digital infrastructure, highlighted by a 20-year lease agreement at its Sandersville, Georgia campus carrying roughly $6.6 billion in base-term revenue. Management has also cited more than 1.8 gigawatts of controlled power capacity and a growing pipeline.
Stock behavior has been volatile. Recent market activity has seen CLSK swing with bitcoin prices and broader AI-infrastructure sentiment, including sharp single-session declines when cryptocurrency and data center names sold off together. Financial results have remained under pressure, with recent quarters posting widening net losses driven partly by noncash bitcoin mark-to-market charges, even as gross margins stayed above 40%. The company's liquidity position and a recent senior secured notes offering have strengthened its funding, but execution on lease signings and construction timelines remains a key investor focus.
TTWO Overview and Recent Performance
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) is a leading developer and publisher of interactive entertainment under labels including Rockstar Games, 2K, and Zynga. Its portfolio spans franchises such as Grand Theft Auto, NBA 2K, Red Dead Redemption, and Civilization, with roughly three-quarters of sales generated by recurrent consumer spending on in-game content.
Recent market activity has been constructive. The company's latest quarterly results beat analyst estimates, with revenue and a narrower-than-expected loss per share, and the stock rallied in extended trading. Recurrent consumer spending continued to grow, led by NBA 2K and mobile titles. The central catalyst is the scheduled November 19, 2026 launch of Grand Theft Auto VI, which underpins fiscal 2027 guidance for revenue in the range of $7.9 billion to $8.1 billion. Analysts have largely maintained buy ratings, though the company has yet to return to consistent GAAP profitability, and insider selling has been noted in recent quarters.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of automated trading strategies from a broader library of hundreds of AI trading bots that monitor thousands of tickers. Because each bot differs in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and the specific set of tickers it trades, only those best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. Traders can review performance metrics and observe how these systems navigate momentum, volatility, and sector rotation in real time. Whether you are evaluating names like CleanSpark and Take-Two or scanning the wider market, exploring Trending AI Robots can offer an additional, data-driven perspective on where algorithmic interest is concentrated.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast between CLSK and TTWO is business-model maturity and earnings visibility. CleanSpark's growth case depends on a capital-intensive pivot from bitcoin mining to AI data center hosting, where revenue is contracted but cash flow remains years away. Its shares are therefore leveraged to both crypto prices and the pace of infrastructure buildout. Take-Two, by contrast, operates an established recurring-revenue model with a concrete, dated catalyst in Grand Theft Auto VI, offering comparatively clearer near-term earnings direction.
Risk profiles also differ. CLSK carries elevated volatility tied to bitcoin and regulatory uncertainty around data center power, while TTWO faces execution and concentration risk around a single franchise launch and ongoing GAAP losses. Sector exposure and market sentiment reinforce the divide: CleanSpark trades as a high-beta crypto and AI-infrastructure play, whereas Take-Two is evaluated as a more stable, catalyst-driven consumer discretionary name.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Weighing trend consistency, stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor TTWO over CLSK in the current environment. Take-Two offers steadier price behavior, improving financial results, and a well-defined near-term catalyst in its flagship release, factors that tend to produce more consistent algorithmic signals. CleanSpark presents meaningful upside potential but also substantially higher volatility, persistent losses, and dependence on Bitcoin and infrastructure execution. While the outcome remains probabilistic and subject to changing conditions, the balance of observable factors currently tilts toward TTWO for its comparatively stronger stability and clearer growth trigger.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a StrongBuy and TTWO is a StrongBuy.
CLSK's Stochastic Oscillator is staying in oversold zone for 5 days
The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an uptrend is expected.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where CLSK's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 26 of 30 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
Following a +21.65% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CLSK advanced for three days, in 226 of 260 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
CLSK may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CLSK turned negative on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 38 of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.
The 10-day moving average for CLSK crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 14 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The 50-day moving average for CLSK moved below the 200-day moving average on October 13, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CLSK declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
The Aroon Indicator for CLSK entered a downward trend on November 09, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 65 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.078) is normal, around the industry mean (3.120). P/E Ratio (-1.630) is within average values for comparable stocks, (6.734). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (8.976) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.397) is also within normal values, averaging (16.899).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. CLSK’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CLSK’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock worse than average.
TTWO's RSI Oscillator climbs out of oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for TTWO moved out of oversold territory on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 31 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 26 of the 31 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 84%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 04, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on TTWO as a result. In 55 of 81 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TTWO just turned positive on November 04, 2026. Looking at past instances where TTWO's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 36 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
TTWO moved above its 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +2.86% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TTWO advanced for three days, in 220 of 327 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
TTWO may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The 50-day moving average for TTWO moved below the 200-day moving average on October 07, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TTWO declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 57%.
The Aroon Indicator for TTWO entered a downward trend on October 20, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 32 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. TTWO’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 74 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. TTWO’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 95, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (11.134) is normal, around the industry mean (12.346). TTWO's P/E Ratio (-124.202) is considerably lower than the industry average of (-4.296). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.772) is also within normal values, averaging (2.125). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (2.202) among similar stocks. TTWO's P/S Ratio (5.869) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (1.575).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
CLSK | TTWO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (85) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as CLSK (100) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's SMR Rating (93) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as CLSK (98) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (91) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLSK (98) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew significantly faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | TTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 64% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while TTWO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TTWO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TTWO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.36% price change this week, while TTWO (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was +7.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -23.03%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2026.
TTWO is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.03% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Electronics/Appliances (+0.57% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
Advertisement