Advertisement
CLSK vs TTWO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CleanSpark operates in Bitcoin mining with exposure to cryptocurrency price movements and expanding infrastructure, while Take-Two Interactive focuses on video game development and publishing with major titles driving revenue.
- Both stocks face near-term earnings reports in early August 2026, creating potential volatility around quarterly results and forward guidance.
- CLSK has shown higher beta and sensitivity to sector-specific catalysts such as Bitcoin performance and energy contracts in recent market activity.
- TTWO exhibits lower volatility relative to broader market indices and benefits from long-cycle entertainment franchises amid shifting consumer spending patterns.
- Sector positioning differs markedly: CLSK aligns with digital assets and potential AI-related energy demand, whereas TTWO operates in interactive media with anticipated product launches.
- Market sentiment reflects contrasting risk profiles, with CLSK displaying greater short-term swings and TTWO maintaining steadier institutional interest.
Introduction
This comparison examines CleanSpark (CLSK) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) to highlight differences in business models, recent performance drivers, and positioning within their respective sectors. The analysis focuses on observable market data and developments over recent weeks, providing traders and investors with a factual framework for evaluating relative strengths. Portfolio managers seeking exposure to cryptocurrency infrastructure or entertainment content may find the contrast useful for diversification considerations. Individual investors evaluating growth versus stability trade-offs can use the details to assess alignment with broader market conditions and risk tolerance.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark engages in Bitcoin mining and related digital infrastructure operations. In recent market activity, the stock has traded with notable volatility tied to cryptocurrency valuations and operational expansions, including power capacity additions. Recent analyst commentary has included upward price target adjustments amid discussions of potential AI-adjacent energy uses. The company is scheduled to report fiscal third-quarter results shortly, with expectations centered on revenue trends and hash rate growth. Broader sentiment has reflected mixed reactions to earnings setups in the sector, contributing to price fluctuations within established ranges.
TTWO Overview and Recent Performance
Take-Two Interactive develops and publishes video games across multiple platforms. Recent market activity shows the stock trading in a relatively contained range ahead of its first-quarter fiscal 2027 earnings release. Anticipation around major franchise releases continues to influence positioning, with analyst coverage remaining generally constructive on long-term prospects. The company has reported prior-period net bookings growth, though near-term estimates include projected EPS moderation. Overall sentiment incorporates both entertainment spending trends and positioning for upcoming product cycles.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a broader pool of hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions are featured in the trending section. Available bots display a range of historical performance metrics, win rates, and drawdown statistics across diverse asset classes. The platform enables users to review detailed statistics and select bots aligned with specific trading preferences. Explore the Trending AI Robots page for current selections and performance data.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CleanSpark and Take-Two Interactive operate in fundamentally different sectors: digital asset infrastructure versus entertainment software. CLSK growth drivers center on mining efficiency, energy contracts, and Bitcoin market dynamics, introducing higher correlation to cryptocurrency cycles and energy costs. TTWO growth relies on recurring revenue from established franchises and new releases, with lower direct exposure to commodity volatility. Recent momentum shows CLSK with larger percentage swings, while TTWO has maintained comparatively stable price action relative to major indices. Risk factors for CLSK include regulatory developments in crypto and operational leverage to power availability; for TTWO, they involve development delays and shifts in consumer discretionary spending. Market sentiment favors TTWO for defensive characteristics in uncertain environments, whereas CLSK appeals to those seeking thematic exposure to blockchain and potential AI infrastructure demand.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings positioning, and relative sector stability, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic weighting to TTWO. The stock’s lower beta and positioning ahead of a major product cycle provide a more measured risk profile compared with CLSK’s sensitivity to external commodity and energy variables. This assessment reflects data-driven evaluation rather than certainty and remains subject to updates with new market information.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and TTWO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTWO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TTWO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- TTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.71% price change this week, while TTWO (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.15%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.70%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2026.
TTWO is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.39% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Electronics/Appliances (-1.37% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| CLSK | TTWO | CLSK / TTWO | |
| Capitalization | 3.11B | 46.2B | 7% |
| EBITDA | -69.3M | 1.24B | -6% |
| Gain YTD | 19.466 | -3.546 | -549% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 740M | 6.66B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 935M | 1.99B | 47% |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 2.96B | 61% |
CLSK | TTWO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 58 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 31 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 27 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (98) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (100) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's SMR Rating (95) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as CLSK (98) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as CLSK (59) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLSK (87) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew significantly faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | TTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 88% | 20 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 47% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CBOL | 23.48 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| Calamos Laddered Bitcoin Str Alt Prt ETF | |||
| WCME | 18.98 | -0.03 | -0.15% |
| First Trust WCM Devpg Wld Eq ETF | |||
| GSUS | 107.31 | -0.17 | -0.16% |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US Equity ETF | |||
| BGRN | 46.89 | -0.12 | -0.25% |
| iShares USD Green Bond ETF | |||
| IZRL | 29.98 | -0.14 | -0.46% |
| ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF | |||
TTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then NET could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTWO | 100% | +2.08% | ||
| NET - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | -4.55% | ||
| COIN - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.53% | ||
| PANW - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.96% | ||
| DOCS - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | -6.73% | ||
| CLSK - TTWO | 46% Loosely correlated | +4.95% | ||
More | ||||