Advertisement
PANW vs TTWO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Palo Alto Networks (PANW) vs. Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- PANW has delivered stronger year-to-date returns of approximately 34% compared to TTWO’s roughly 11% as of mid-May 2026, reflecting robust demand for cybersecurity solutions.
- Analyst sentiment has turned markedly positive for PANW in recent weeks, with multiple price-target increases and new buy ratings tied to AI-driven security innovations.
- TTWO continues to focus on its extensive game pipeline, including updates to major titles, while preparing to report full-year fiscal 2026 results on May 21, 2026.
- Sector exposure differs sharply: PANW operates in high-growth cybersecurity amid rising AI-related threats, whereas TTWO remains exposed to consumer entertainment and release-timing risks.
- Both stocks trade near multi-month highs, yet PANW shows greater momentum consistency and elevated trading volumes in recent market activity.
- Relative performance highlights a clear trade-off between defensive technology growth and cyclical entertainment sector dynamics.
Introduction
Investors and traders frequently compare PANW and TTWO because the two companies represent distinct growth narratives within the broader technology sector. Palo Alto Networks delivers enterprise cybersecurity platforms, while Take-Two Interactive develops and publishes interactive entertainment. This comparison appeals to growth-oriented investors seeking exposure to either digital defense or consumer media, as well as to traders monitoring relative momentum and sector rotation. The analysis examines recent performance trends, business fundamentals, and market positioning to help readers evaluate how each stock has responded to current macroeconomic and industry-specific conditions.
PANW Overview and Recent Performance
Palo Alto Networks provides cloud-based cybersecurity solutions that protect enterprises from evolving threats, including those amplified by artificial intelligence. In recent market activity, the stock has exhibited consistent upward momentum, climbing toward all-time highs near $248 amid a series of analyst upgrades. Multiple firms raised price targets in May 2026, citing strong demand for the company’s identity-security platforms and next-generation offerings. Fiscal second-quarter results released in February showed 15% year-over-year revenue growth and a 33% increase in next-generation security annual recurring revenue. Upcoming fiscal third-quarter results, scheduled for June 2, 2026, are expected to provide further insight into continued expansion. Sentiment has remained constructive, supported by the company’s positioning at the intersection of cybersecurity and AI-driven risk management.
TTWO Overview and Recent Performance
Take-Two Interactive develops and publishes video games and entertainment software, with flagship franchises driving long-term revenue. The stock has traded in a relatively stable range around $242 during recent weeks, reflecting anticipation ahead of the company’s fourth-quarter and full-year fiscal 2026 earnings release on May 21, 2026. Earlier in the fiscal year, the company raised its net-bookings outlook, citing a solid start and an ambitious content pipeline. Year-to-date performance has been more modest than broader technology indices, with the shares remaining below their October 2025 peak. Market sentiment centers on release timing and consumer engagement metrics rather than immediate earnings catalysts. The company’s valuation continues to reflect expectations for multi-year growth from major titles still in development.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots that execute strategies across thousands of tickers. While hundreds of bots are available with varying styles, timeframes, and performance statistics, only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions are featured in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ diverse approaches—including trend-following, mean-reversion, and momentum models—allowing users to compare historical win rates, drawdowns, and trade frequency. The platform highlights bots with favorable risk-adjusted metrics to assist traders in identifying suitable automated strategies for current volatility and sector rotation. Review the Trending AI Robots page for detailed performance data and configuration options.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The two companies operate in fundamentally different business models. PANW generates recurring revenue through subscription-based security platforms, offering greater visibility and resilience during economic uncertainty. TTWO relies on discrete game launches, introducing higher variability tied to consumer reception and release schedules. Recent momentum favors PANW, which has benefited from sustained analyst support and sector tailwinds in cybersecurity, while TTWO has traded more sideways amid broader entertainment-sector caution. Risk factors also diverge: PANW faces intense competition and rapid technological change, whereas TTWO contends with development delays and shifting player preferences. Sector exposure further accentuates the contrast, with PANW aligned to enterprise spending on digital defense and TTWO linked to discretionary consumer outlays.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, analyst support, and near-term catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probability of relative outperformance to PANW. The stock’s sustained upward trajectory, repeated price-target revisions, and alignment with AI-security demand provide a clearer positive signal than TTWO’s more range-bound behavior ahead of earnings. This assessment remains probabilistic and reflects prevailing data rather than a guarantee of future results.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsTo compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PANW is a Buy and TTWO is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PANW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTTWO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PANW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- TTWO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PANW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PANW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TTWO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
PANW (@Computer Communications) experienced а -3.42% price change this week, while TTWO (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -4.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -9.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.54%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -4.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
PANW is expected to report earnings on Aug 24, 2026.
TTWO is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-9.57% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Electronics/Appliances (-4.17% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| PANW | TTWO | PANW / TTWO | |
| Capitalization | 222B | 39.8B | 558% |
| EBITDA | 1.99B | 1.24B | 161% |
| Gain YTD | 47.693 | -16.264 | -293% |
| P/E Ratio | 236.57 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 10.6B | 6.66B | 159% |
| Total Cash | 3.11B | 1.99B | 156% |
| Total Debt | 2.07B | 2.96B | 70% |
PANW | TTWO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PANW's Valuation (87) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as TTWO (97) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTWO (71) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's SMR Rating (87) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as TTWO (95) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTWO (59) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as TTWO (16) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
| PANW | TTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 77% | 8 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
PANW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | -2.58% | ||
| CRWD - PANW | 75% Closely correlated | -6.68% | ||
| FTNT - PANW | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| NOW - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | -5.79% | ||
| OKTA - PANW | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.85% | ||
| ADSK - PANW | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
More | ||||
TTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then NET could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTWO | 100% | -1.04% | ||
| NET - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | -6.90% | ||
| COIN - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| PANW - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| DOCS - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| CLSK - TTWO | 46% Loosely correlated | -7.09% | ||
More | ||||