DOCS
Price
$20.55
Change
+$0.10 (+0.49%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.73B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTWO
Price
$231.76
Change
+$1.51 (+0.66%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
42.75B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DOCS vs TTWO

DOCS vs TTWO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Doximity (DOCS) vs. Take-Two Interactive Software (TTWO) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Doximity (DOCS) has endured a sharp sell-off in 2026, falling more than 50% year-to-date, driven by disappointing forward guidance, slowing revenue growth, and mounting AI-related investment costs that are compressing margins.
  • Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) has shown relative resilience, with a modest single-digit decline year-to-date, supported by an 18% revenue expansion in fiscal 2026 and anticipation around the eventual release of Grand Theft Auto VI.
  • DOCS trades at a significantly compressed valuation — a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) near 20 — reflecting market skepticism about its ability to monetize its AI pivot, while TTWO commands a forward P/E above 30 despite lingering GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) losses.
  • Both companies face distinct execution risks: DOCS contends with rising AI-native competition and soft pharma advertising budgets; TTWO remains unprofitable on a GAAP basis and carries high expectations around its flagship pipeline.
  • The two stocks operate in entirely different sectors — healthcare technology versus interactive entertainment — making this comparison valuable for investors weighing defensive, cash-flow-rich businesses against growth narratives tied to blockbuster product cycles.

Introduction

Investors scanning the market in mid-2026 face starkly different propositions in Doximity and Take-Two Interactive. One is a niche healthcare platform grappling with an identity crisis as it pivots toward artificial intelligence; the other is a gaming giant riding a wave of revenue acceleration and towering expectations for its next marquee release. While their industries could hardly be more different, both stocks sit at pivotal junctures that demand clear-eyed analysis. This comparison is designed for traders and long-term investors who want to understand how two very different growth stories stack up in terms of momentum, valuation, risk, and sector dynamics.

DOCS Overview and Recent Performance

Doximity operates the largest professional medical network in the United States, used by more than 85% of U.S. physicians. The company generates revenue primarily through targeted pharmaceutical advertising and subscription-based workflow tools for hospitals and health systems. After years of robust double-digit growth, the narrative around DOCS has shifted dramatically in recent months. The stock has shed over half its value year-to-date, sliding from above $44 at the start of 2026 to around $21–$22 in recent trading, placing it near its 52-week low of $17.15.

The catalyst for the sell-off was Doximity's fiscal fourth-quarter 2026 earnings report, released in May, which delivered fiscal 2027 revenue guidance of $664 million to $676 million — implying just 3% to 5% year-over-year growth and landing well below Wall Street's consensus of roughly $697 million. Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) guidance of $323 million to $335 million came in approximately 12% below Street estimates. Management framed fiscal 2027 as an "AI investment year," signaling elevated spending on compute costs, the DoxGPT clinical AI assistant, and brand marketing. More than ten Wall Street firms downgraded the stock or cut price targets in the immediate aftermath, and a CFO departure in April added to the uncertainty. Despite these headwinds, Doximity retains a pristine balance sheet — approximately $766 million in cash and equivalents with zero debt — and gross margins still hover near 89%.

TTWO Overview and Recent Performance

Take-Two Interactive Software is one of the world's largest video game publishers, home to iconic franchises including Grand Theft Auto, Red Dead Redemption, NBA 2K, and a growing mobile portfolio featuring titles such as Toon Blast and Match Factory. The company's fiscal 2026 revenue reached $6.66 billion, an 18.2% increase over the prior year, driven by strong recurrent consumer spending — which now accounts for roughly 79% of total net bookings — across its core live-service titles.

Shares of TTWO have held up comparatively well in 2026, declining approximately 7% to 8% year-to-date, with recent trading around the $237–$240 range. The stock has traded between a 52-week low of roughly $187 and a high near $266. Market sentiment has been supported by steady operational execution and the enormous shadow cast by Grand Theft Auto VI, widely expected to be one of the largest entertainment launches in history whenever it arrives. That said, Take-Two remains unprofitable on a GAAP basis — posting a fiscal 2026 diluted EPS of -$1.62, albeit a dramatic improvement from -$25.58 the prior year — and carries a forward P/E above 30, indicating that investors are pricing in significant future earnings expansion rather than current profitability.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in navigating cross-sector comparisons like DOCS and TTWO, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated window into algorithmic trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots covering thousands of tickers, each with distinct trading styles, timeframes, and risk parameters. Only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in the Trending section. Many of these bots have shown annualized returns ranging from the high teens to over 40% in backtesting and real-money simulations, with trade-by-trade transparency and detailed performance statistics available for review. Whether you favor swing trading, trend following, or mean-reversion approaches, exploring these AI-driven strategies may complement your own comparative analysis.

Head-to-Head Comparison

From a sector perspective, Doximity and Take-Two occupy fundamentally different corners of the market. DOCS is a healthcare technology company tied to pharmaceutical advertising cycles and physician workflow tools; TTWO is a consumer discretionary entertainment business driven by game release cycles and live-service monetization. This divergence explains much of their recent performance gap.

On growth, TTWO holds the advantage. Take-Two's 18% top-line expansion in fiscal 2026 dwarfs Doximity's decelerating 13% revenue growth — and the forward outlook widens the gap further, with Doximity guiding to only 3%–5% growth in fiscal 2027 while Take-Two's pipeline, anchored by GTA VI, implies a far more robust trajectory. On profitability, however, Doximity remains firmly in the black with a trailing P/E around 20, whereas Take-Two continues to report GAAP net losses, making its premium forward multiple a bet on future earnings that have yet to materialize.

Risk profiles also differ sharply. DOCS faces competitive encroachment from AI-native platforms such as OpenEvidence, potential structural margin compression from AI compute spending, and softness in pharmaceutical advertising budgets. TTWO's risks center on execution: if GTA VI faces delays or fails to meet towering expectations, the stock's rich valuation could face a swift reassessment. On the stability front, Doximity's $766 million cash hoard and zero-debt balance sheet provide a downside cushion that Take-Two, with a net debt position exceeding $1 billion, does not enjoy in the same measure.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and the presence of identifiable catalysts, Tickeron's AI-driven framework would likely tilt in favor of TTWO over DOCS under current market conditions. Take-Two benefits from a clearer near-term growth narrative — anchored by GTA VI anticipation and steadily expanding recurrent consumer spending — and its stock has maintained a more stable technical posture, holding above its 200-day moving average for much of recent market activity. Doximity, by contrast, remains in a pronounced downtrend with suppressed sentiment following a wave of analyst downgrades and limited near-term catalysts until its AI investments begin translating into measurable revenue acceleration. While Doximity's deeply discounted valuation and fortress balance sheet may appeal to value-oriented investors willing to wait, the AI's probabilistic assessment would favor the stock exhibiting stronger trend consistency and more defined upside catalysts at this juncture.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DOCS vs. TTWO commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DOCS is a StrongBuy and TTWO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (DOCS: $20.45 vs. TTWO: $230.25)
Brand notoriety: DOCS: Not notable vs. TTWO: Notable
DOCS represents the Services to the Health Industry, while TTWO is part of the Electronics/Appliances industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DOCS: 62% vs. TTWO: 31%
Market capitalization -- DOCS: $3.73B vs. TTWO: $42.75B
DOCS [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $3.73B. TTWO’s [@Electronics/Appliances] market capitalization is $42.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $29.17B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.3B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $11.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DOCS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTWO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DOCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TTWO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DOCS is a better buy in the long-term than TTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DOCS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DOCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DOCS is a better buy in the short-term than TTWO.

Price Growth

DOCS (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -7.92% price change this week, while TTWO (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -3.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -5.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.10%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -2.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

DOCS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

TTWO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-5.40% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Electronics/Appliances (-2.97% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TTWO($42.7B) has a higher market cap than DOCS($3.73B). TTWO YTD gains are higher at: -10.069 vs. DOCS (-53.817). TTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.24B vs. DOCS (229M). TTWO has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. DOCS (749M). DOCS has less debt than TTWO: DOCS (10.2M) vs TTWO (2.96B). TTWO has higher revenues than DOCS: TTWO (6.66B) vs DOCS (645M).
DOCSTTWODOCS / TTWO
Capitalization3.73B42.7B9%
EBITDA229M1.24B18%
Gain YTD-53.817-10.069534%
P/E Ratio20.87N/A-
Revenue645M6.66B10%
Total Cash749M1.99B38%
Total Debt10.2M2.96B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TTWO: Fundamental Ratings
TTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
60
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DOCSTTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DOCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMST7.220.02
+0.28%
Bitwise MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
DUKX28.42N/A
N/A
Ocean Park International ETF
JHMM73.62-0.28
-0.38%
JHancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
PSMD34.29-0.17
-0.48%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (January) ETF
ETB15.32-0.20
-1.29%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund

DOCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DOCS has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DOCS jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DOCS
1D Price
Change %
DOCS100%
-0.20%
COIN - DOCS
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.99%
PUBM - DOCS
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.77%
CLSK - DOCS
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
COMP - DOCS
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.26%
RIOT - DOCS
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
More

TTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then NET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTWO
1D Price
Change %
TTWO100%
-1.43%
NET - TTWO
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
COIN - TTWO
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.99%
PANW - TTWO
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.88%
DOCS - TTWO
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
CLSK - TTWO
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
More