Advertisement
CLST vs RCBC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLST is a StrongBuy and RCBC is a Hold.
Aroon Indicator for CLST shows an upward move is likely
CLST's Aroon Indicator triggered a bullish signal on November 06, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor detected that the AroonUp green line is above 70 while the AroonDown red line is below 30. When the up indicator moves above 70 and the down indicator remains below 30, it is a sign that the stock could be setting up for a bullish move. Traders may want to buy the stock or look to buy calls options. A.I.dvisor looked at 238 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator showed a similar pattern. In 101 of the 238 cases, the stock moved higher in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move higher at 42%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CLST just turned positive on October 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where CLST's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 22 of 62 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 35%.
The 10-day moving average for CLST crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 3 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 19%.
Following a +0.64% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CLST advanced for three days, in 62 of 188 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 33%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for CLST moved out of overbought territory on November 09, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 26 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 6 of the 26 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 23%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 17 of 68 cases where CLST's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 25%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CLST as a result. In 30 of 124 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 24%.
CLST moved below its 50-day moving average on November 13, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CLST declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 23%.
CLST broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 16 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CLST’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 55 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 91 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.885) is normal, around the industry mean (1.262). P/E Ratio (32.348) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.479). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.036) among similar stocks. CLST's P/S Ratio (5.770) is slightly higher than the industry average of (3.738).
CLST | RCBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 95 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLST's Valuation (91) in the null industry is in the same range as RCBC (98). This means that CLST’s stock grew similarly to RCBC’s over the last 12 months.
RCBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLST (55). This means that RCBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.
RCBC's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLST (86). This means that RCBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.
RCBC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CLST (46). This means that RCBC’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.
RCBC's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as CLST (16). This means that RCBC’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.
| CLST | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 33% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RCBC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CLST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RCBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CLST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CLST (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.39% price change this week, while RCBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
RCBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+1.00% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
CLST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLST has been loosely correlated with COFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLST jumps, then COFS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLST | 100% | -1.76% | ||
| COFS - CLST | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| FITB - CLST | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| CARE - CLST | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.76% | ||
| ORRF - CLST | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| PKBK - CLST | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||
RCBC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RCBC and AVBC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCBC and AVBC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCBC | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| AVBC - RCBC | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| CCNEP - RCBC | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
| TCBS - RCBC | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| CLST - RCBC | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.76% | ||
| CBNA - RCBC | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FNX | 141.44 | 0.13 | +0.09% |
| First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) | |||
| SHUS | 50.89 | N/A | N/A |
| Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF (SHUS) | |||
| HBDC | 24.31 | N/A | N/A |
| Hilton Bdc Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| MRSK | 38.91 | -0.09 | -0.23% |
| Toews Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) | |||
| TNUK | 20.58 | -0.23 | -1.12% |
| Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF | |||