CLX
Price
$106.54
Change
+$0.78 (+0.74%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
12.88B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UL
Price
$62.68
Change
+$0.96 (+1.56%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
132.95B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLX vs UL

CLX vs UL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Clorox (CLX) vs. Unilever (UL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Clorox (CLX) operates primarily in the U.S. household and cleaning products sector, while Unilever (UL) maintains a diversified global presence across beauty, personal care, home care, and foods.
  • In recent weeks, CLX has traded near $95 amid ongoing margin pressures and a trimmed fiscal 2026 outlook following flat Q3 sales, whereas UL has hovered around $61 ahead of its Q2 earnings release.
  • CLX shows concentrated exposure to North American consumer staples with recent cost-saving initiatives, contrasting UL’s broader international footprint and category mix that includes prestige beauty and nutrition.
  • Relative performance data indicate CLX delivered approximately 3% year-to-date returns compared with UL’s roughly 5% over the same period, both lagging broader market benchmarks in recent market activity.
  • Risk factors for CLX include domestic sales volatility and manufacturing cost headwinds, while UL faces currency fluctuations and competitive pressures across emerging and developed markets.
  • Market sentiment reflects cautious analyst positioning for both names, with focus on upcoming earnings as key catalysts for near-term price behavior.

Introduction

Clorox (CLX) and Unilever (UL) represent two established players in the consumer staples sector, offering investors exposure to everyday household and personal care products. This comparison examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and relative positioning to assist traders and long-term investors evaluating defensive holdings. Portfolio managers and individual investors seeking stable dividend payers or sector diversification often review such pairings when assessing risk-adjusted returns in uncertain economic environments.

CLX Overview and Recent Performance

The Clorox Company manufactures and markets consumer and professional products through segments including Health and Wellness, Household, Lifestyle, and International. Its portfolio features well-known brands such as Clorox bleach, Pine-Sol, Glad, and Hidden Valley. In recent weeks, CLX has traded near $95 following the company’s Q3 fiscal 2026 results, which showed flat net sales and an organic sales decline of 1%. Adjusted earnings per share rose 13% year-over-year due to cost savings, though management lowered its full-year 2026 guidance citing margin pressures and higher manufacturing costs. The stock’s year-to-date return stands at approximately 3%, with upcoming fourth-quarter results scheduled for August 3, 2026, serving as the next focal point for sentiment.

UL Overview and Recent Performance

Unilever PLC operates as a global fast-moving consumer goods company with four main segments: Beauty & Wellbeing, Personal Care, Home Care, and Foods. Its brands span multiple categories and geographies, reaching consumers in over 190 countries. In recent market activity, UL has traded around $61 ahead of its Q2 2026 earnings release expected on July 28, 2026. The company reported solid full-year results earlier in 2026 that met expectations, accompanied by a share buyback program. Year-to-date returns approximate 5%, supported by steady demand for staples despite currency headwinds and competitive dynamics in key markets.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots exhibit varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker coverage, with many posting win rates between 55% and 75% alongside differing risk-reward profiles and holding periods. This diversity allows users to explore automated approaches suited to individual objectives. Explore the full collection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Clorox (CLX) maintains a narrower geographic and category focus centered on North American cleaning and household essentials, while Unilever (UL) benefits from global scale and exposure to higher-growth beauty and nutrition categories. Recent momentum has favored UL’s steadier organic trends over CLX’s flat sales and revised guidance. Risk considerations differ markedly: CLX contends with domestic cost inflation and limited diversification, whereas UL navigates foreign exchange volatility and intense competition worldwide. Sector exposure places both in consumer defensive, yet UL’s broader footprint offers potential offsets during regional slowdowns. Market sentiment appears measured for each, with analysts emphasizing earnings visibility as the primary driver of near-term relative performance.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, geographic diversification, and positioning ahead of earnings, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable relative performance to Unilever (UL) over the near term. Its wider international reach and category balance may provide greater resilience compared with Clorox (CLX)’s more concentrated exposure amid ongoing domestic margin pressures. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to prevailing data rather than a guarantee of future outcomes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CLX vs. UL commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLX is a StrongBuy and UL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CLX: $106.54 vs. UL: $62.68)
Brand notoriety: CLX and UL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLX: 152% vs. UL: 49%
Market capitalization -- CLX: $12.88B vs. UL: $132.95B
CLX [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $12.88B. UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $132.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $335.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $22.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLX is a better buy in the long-term than UL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLX is a better buy in the short-term than UL.

Price Growth

CLX (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +2.07% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -1.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLX is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-0.83% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UL($133B) has a higher market cap than CLX($12.9B). CLX has higher P/E ratio than UL: CLX (22.15) vs UL (20.97). CLX YTD gains are higher at: 9.444 vs. UL (-2.501). UL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.1B vs. CLX (1.17B). UL has higher revenues than CLX: UL (50.5B) vs CLX (6.72B).
CLXULCLX / UL
Capitalization12.9B133B10%
EBITDA1.17B11.1B11%
Gain YTD9.444-2.501-378%
P/E Ratio22.1520.97106%
Revenue6.72B50.5B13%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt4.49BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLX vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
CLX
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3167
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
730
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3163
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4345

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UL's Valuation (31) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLX (85). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLX’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CLX (100). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to CLX’s over the last 12 months.

CLX's SMR Rating (7) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (30). This means that CLX’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

CLX's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (58). This means that CLX’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

CLX's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (63). This means that CLX’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLXUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIG26.352.60
+10.95%
Figma Inc
NEOG11.890.43
+3.75%
Neogen Corp
CVU5.660.18
+3.28%
CPI Aerostructures
JOUT48.811.24
+2.61%
Johnson Outdoors
PWCM1.52N/A
N/A
PowerCompute Inc

CLX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLX has been loosely correlated with CHD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLX jumps, then CHD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLX
1D Price
Change %
CLX100%
+0.74%
CHD - CLX
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
PG - CLX
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
CL - CLX
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
UL - CLX
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
IPAR - CLX
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
More