CLX
Price
$83.97
Change
-$3.18 (-3.65%)
Updated
Sep 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.54B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PG
Price
$147.44
Change
-$0.78 (-0.53%)
Updated
Sep 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
339.3B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLX vs PG

CLX vs PG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 14, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? The Clorox Company (CLX) vs. The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • The Clorox Company (CLX) has experienced sharper price declines in recent market activity compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG), with notable weakness over the past month.
  • PG maintains a significantly larger market capitalization and broader product portfolio, providing greater diversification across consumer staples categories.
  • CLX operates with a more concentrated focus on cleaning and household products, exposing it to specific category pressures not as pronounced in PG’s diversified lineup.
  • Recent performance shows PG demonstrating relative stability, while CLX has traded near the lower end of its 52-week range amid broader sector dynamics.
  • Both companies belong to the consumer staples sector, offering defensive characteristics, though PG’s scale supports more consistent positioning in market sentiment assessments.
  • Analyst targets indicate potential upside for both, with valuation metrics reflecting differing risk profiles tied to business concentration and earnings stability.

Introduction

This comparison examines The Clorox Company (CLX) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG), two established players in the consumer staples sector focused on household and personal care products. The analysis highlights differences in business scope, recent price behavior, and market positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating relative opportunities within defensive equities. Participants seeking to understand sector resilience, momentum contrasts, and operational scale in the current environment may find the review relevant for portfolio context or tactical allocation decisions.

CLX Overview and Recent Performance

The Clorox Company (CLX) produces and markets consumer products primarily in cleaning, household, and related categories across domestic and select international markets. In recent weeks, the stock has shown pronounced downward pressure, trading near the lower boundary of its 52-week range amid softer sentiment in targeted categories. Market activity reflects sensitivity to input costs, competitive dynamics, and shifting consumer preferences toward value options. Broader timeframe references indicate underperformance relative to sector peers, with volume patterns and technical indicators pointing to continued caution among participants monitoring earnings visibility and margin trends.

PG Overview and Recent Performance

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) develops, manufactures, and distributes a wide array of branded consumer goods spanning beauty, grooming, health care, fabric care, and baby care segments on a global scale. Recent market activity has featured more measured price movements, with the shares maintaining relative stability compared to narrower peers. Sentiment has been supported by the company’s diversified revenue base and consistent execution across regions, though tempered by modest organic growth readings in certain quarters. Over recent weeks, positioning has appeared steadier, reflecting the benefits of scale in navigating category-specific and macroeconomic influences.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics tailored to prevailing market conditions. Only those demonstrating strong suitability and consistent metrics earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of annualized returns, win rates, and drawdown profiles, enabling users to explore options aligned with specific risk tolerances and trading styles. Review the curated list for insights into current opportunities.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The Clorox Company (CLX) maintains a focused business model centered on core cleaning and household essentials, contrasting with The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)’s expansive portfolio that spans multiple daily-use categories and geographies. Growth drivers for CLX tie closely to category-specific demand and cost management, while PG benefits from broader pricing power and emerging-market exposure. Recent momentum has favored PG’s relative stability over CLX’s sharper declines. Risk factors for CLX include higher concentration and volatility, whereas PG’s scale introduces execution complexity but supports resilience. Sector exposure remains defensive for both, yet market sentiment has reflected greater consistency around the larger entity amid ongoing consumer staples rotation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative stability, and positioning within the consumer staples sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The broader diversification and steadier recent performance metrics provide a more balanced profile compared to the concentrated exposures evident in The Clorox Company (CLX). This assessment draws from measurable price behavior and sector context rather than forward projections.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CLX vs. PG commentary
Sep 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLX is a Hold and PG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLX vs PG: Fundamental Ratings
CLX
PG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5233
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
1033
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6454
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5150
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PG's Valuation (35) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLX (77). This means that PG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLX’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLX (100). This means that PG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLX’s over the last 12 months.

CLX's SMR Rating (10) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (33). This means that CLX’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CLX (64). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to CLX’s over the last 12 months.

PG's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CLX (51). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to CLX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLXPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CLX: $87.15 vs. PG: $148.22)
Brand notoriety: CLX: Not notable vs. PG: Notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLX: 113% vs. PG: 65%
Market capitalization -- CLX: $10.54B vs. PG: $339.3B
CLX [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $10.54B. PG’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $339.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $60.48K to $339.3B. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $22.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the long-term than CLX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the short-term than CLX.

Price Growth

CLX (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -0.01% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +1.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLX is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

PG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.36% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALGN153.296.41
+4.36%
Align Technology
BKE41.750.96
+2.35%
Buckle (The)
BRKRP452.12-0.22
-0.05%
Bruker Corporation
CDRO9.00-0.31
-3.33%
Codere Online Luxembourg SA
STI6.86-0.40
-5.51%
Solidion Technology Inc.

CLX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLX has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLX jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLX
1D Price
Change %
CLX100%
+2.67%
PG - CLX
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
CHD - CLX
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
KMB - CLX
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
CL - CLX
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
UL - CLX
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
More

PG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PG
1D Price
Change %
PG100%
+1.46%
CL - PG
75%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
CHD - PG
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
UL - PG
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
KMB - PG
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
CLX - PG
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
More