CMC
Price
$75.17
Change
+$1.48 (+2.01%)
Updated
Aug 7, 01:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.37B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RS
Price
$422.88
Change
+$4.75 (+1.14%)
Updated
Aug 7, 02:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.5B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMC vs RS

CMC vs RS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Commercial Metals Company (CMC) vs. Reliance, Inc. (RS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Different business models: CMC is a steel manufacturer and recycler with expanding precast concrete operations, while RS is the largest metals service center distributor in North America, providing processing and distribution without steel production.
  • CMC has pursued an aggressive growth strategy through transformative acquisitions of Foley Products and Concrete Pipe & Precast, deploying over $2.5 billion to build a precast concrete platform and meaningfully diversify its revenue base.
  • RS continues to expand market share organically, reaching a record 6.4 million tons sold in 2025 and capturing approximately 17% of the U.S. metals service center market, outperforming industry shipment trends by over seven percentage points.
  • Profitability profiles diverge: RS generated $14.3 billion in net sales in 2025 with non-GAAP FIFO (First In, First Out) earnings per share up 13.5%, while CMC's fiscal 2025 was impacted by a $274 million litigation charge, though underlying operations showed margin expansion in recent quarters.
  • Tariff exposure differs materially: RS experienced significant LIFO (Last In, First Out) expense headwinds of $114 million in 2025 tied to tariff-driven aluminum cost increases, whereas CMC, as a domestic producer, may benefit more directly from trade protections on steel.
  • Both companies benefit from structural demand drivers including infrastructure spending, data center construction, energy projects, and reshoring of industrial capacity, though their exposure to these trends differs by business model.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the metals and construction supply chain often encounter two names that, despite operating in adjacent corners of the same industry, represent fundamentally different investment propositions. CMC (Commercial Metals Company) is a vertically integrated steel manufacturer and recycler that has recently expanded into precast concrete through major acquisitions. RS (Reliance, Inc.), by contrast, is a pure-play metals distributor and processor — the largest in North America — that does not produce steel but instead adds value through inventory management, processing, and just-in-time delivery. Understanding how these two business models compare across momentum, risk, and growth drivers is essential for investors evaluating the metals sector in the current market environment.

CMC Overview and Recent Performance

CMC, headquartered in Irving, Texas, manufactures, recycles, and fabricates steel and metal products, operating through three segments: North America Steel Group, Europe Steel Group, and the Construction Solutions Group (formerly Emerging Businesses Group). The company produces reinforcing bar (rebar), merchant bar, wire rod, and other long steel products used primarily in construction. In recent months, CMC has executed a transformative strategic pivot by closing the acquisitions of Concrete Pipe & Precast (CP&P) and Foley Products Company, deploying over $2.5 billion to establish a significant precast concrete platform. This makes CMC the third-largest precast player in the U.S. and the leader in the Southeast. The company's stock has traded in a range between roughly $60 and $85 per share in recent months, reflecting both enthusiasm about the precast expansion and ongoing digestion of the litigation-related charges from the Pacific Steel Group antitrust case, which resulted in a $274 million after-tax charge in fiscal 2025. On an operational level, CMC's steel product metal margins have expanded for multiple consecutive quarters, reaching levels not seen in nearly three years, supported by the company's TAG (Transform, Advance, and Grow) operational excellence program, which targets an annualized run-rate EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) benefit of $150 million by the end of fiscal 2026.

RS Overview and Recent Performance

RS, headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona, operates as the largest metals service center company in North America, providing a diversified range of metal products — including carbon steel, aluminum, stainless steel, and alloys — along with advanced processing services to customers across numerous end markets. Unlike CMC, RS is not a steel producer; its business model revolves around sourcing metals from domestic mills, processing them to customer specifications, and delivering them on a just-in-time basis. In 2025, RS shipped a record 6.4 million tons, up 6.2% year-over-year, and generated $14.3 billion in net sales. The company's non-GAAP FIFO earnings per share grew 13.5%, though GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) EPS declined 10.2% due to a significant swing in LIFO-related accounting adjustments. RS has demonstrated consistent market share gains, expanding its U.S. market share to approximately 17% from 15% a year earlier, while returning $849 million to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. The company's Q1 2026 guidance points to non-GAAP EPS in the $4.50-$4.70 range, reflecting year-over-year growth of 19% to 25%. In recent trading, RS shares have hovered near the $300 level, with a market capitalization around $15 billion.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment where timing and trend recognition are increasingly critical, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers traders access to a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. While Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across stocks, ETFs, forex, and crypto, only the strongest performers — those best suited to prevailing market conditions — earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ a wide variety of trading styles, strategies, and timeframes, with top performers recently delivering annualized returns ranging from 78% to over 290%, and some achieving Sharpe ratios above 2.0 and success rates exceeding 73%. Each bot operates with distinct configurations, including different sets of tickers, risk management parameters, and technical indicator frameworks. For traders looking to supplement their own analysis with AI-driven insights, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can provide a useful starting point for evaluating data-driven trading strategies in real time.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most fundamental distinction between CMC and RS lies in their position within the metals value chain. CMC is a manufacturer that melts scrap, produces finished steel products, and increasingly sells precast concrete solutions — making it more sensitive to steel prices, scrap costs, and construction activity cycles. RS is a distributor that earns a spread between mill prices and customer selling prices, with value added through processing and inventory management, which historically produces a more stable margin profile across cycles. In terms of growth strategy, CMC has taken a more dramatic path, using large-scale M&A (Mergers and Acquisitions) to enter adjacent markets, which introduces integration risk but also opens a larger addressable market. RS has grown primarily organically, steadily taking market share from smaller competitors. On risk factors, CMC carries the overhang of the Pacific Steel Group antitrust litigation and integration risk from its precast acquisitions, while RS faces tariff-related cost pass-through challenges, particularly in aluminum, and end-market softness in aerospace and semiconductors. Market sentiment has recently favored CMC's transformation narrative, with the stock receiving analyst upgrades from firms including Jefferies and JPMorgan, while RS has drawn a mix of Buy and Hold ratings as investors weigh its consistent execution against near-term margin headwinds.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend data, momentum patterns, and the structural positioning of each company, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely favor CMC in the current environment, though with caveats. CMC's expanding steel product metal margins, the contribution from newly acquired precast businesses (estimated at $165-$175 million in EBITDA for fiscal 2026), and the successful execution of its TAG operational improvement program create a multi-catalyst growth narrative that trend-following models tend to identify favorably. The company also benefits more directly from trade protections on domestic steel. However, RS offers a more consistent and battle-tested business model with superior scale, stronger cash flow generation, and a demonstrated ability to gain market share through cycles — attributes that may appeal to AI models prioritizing stability and risk-adjusted returns over momentum. The outcome ultimately depends on whether the AI model weights near-term earnings acceleration and transformative growth potential (favoring CMC) more heavily than consistency, diversification, and through-cycle margin resilience (favoring RS). In probabilistic terms, the balance of observable catalysts currently tilts slightly toward CMC, though both stocks present credible investment cases within the metals and construction supply sector.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CMC vs. RS commentary
Aug 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMC is a StrongBuy and RS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2026
Stock price -- (CMC: $73.69 vs. RS: $418.13)
Brand notoriety: CMC and RS are both not notable
CMC represents the Metal Fabrication, while RS is part of the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMC: 80% vs. RS: 80%
Market capitalization -- CMC: $8.37B vs. RS: $21.5B
CMC [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $8.37B. RS’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $21.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $61.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $5.47B. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $11.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RS is a better buy in the long-term than CMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMC and RS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMC (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +7.72% price change this week, while RS (@Steel) price change was +4.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +7.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.98%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMC is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

RS is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (+7.11% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

@Steel (+1.96% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RS($21.5B) has a higher market cap than CMC($8.37B). RS has higher P/E ratio than CMC: RS (24.30) vs CMC (13.93). RS YTD gains are higher at: 45.831 vs. CMC (7.406). RS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.63B vs. CMC (1.15B). CMC has more cash in the bank: 560M vs. RS (235M). RS has less debt than CMC: RS (2B) vs CMC (3.4B). RS has higher revenues than CMC: RS (15.8B) vs CMC (8.85B).
CMCRSCMC / RS
Capitalization8.37B21.5B39%
EBITDA1.15B1.63B70%
Gain YTD7.40645.83116%
P/E Ratio13.9324.3057%
Revenue8.85B15.8B56%
Total Cash560M235M238%
Total Debt3.4B2B170%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMC vs RS: Fundamental Ratings
CMC
RS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4445
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
276
SMR RATING
1..100
6165
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10032
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6555

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMC's Valuation (19) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RS (20) in the Steel industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew similarly to RS’s over the last 12 months.

RS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CMC (27) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RS’s stock grew similarly to CMC’s over the last 12 months.

CMC's SMR Rating (61) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RS (65) in the Steel industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew similarly to RS’s over the last 12 months.

RS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CMC (42) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RS’s stock grew similarly to CMC’s over the last 12 months.

RS's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMC (100) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RS’s stock grew significantly faster than CMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMCRS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STNG76.382.33
+3.15%
Scorpio Tankers
CNP40.670.02
+0.05%
CenterPoint Energy
CARE33.90-1.21
-3.45%
Carter Bankshares
CVKD1.87-0.09
-4.59%
Cadrenal Therapeutics Inc
ZVIA1.47-0.24
-14.04%
Zevia PBC

CMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMC has been closely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMC jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMC
1D Price
Change %
CMC100%
-2.62%
STLD - CMC
73%
Closely correlated
-1.68%
RS - CMC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
NUE - CMC
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
MTUS - CMC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
WS - CMC
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.76%
More