Advertisement
COHN vs PWP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COHN is a Hold and PWP is a Buy.
COHN | PWP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 31 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 69 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COHN's Valuation (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PWP (14) in the null industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew similarly to PWP’s over the last 12 months.
PWP's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as COHN (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that PWP’s stock grew similarly to COHN’s over the last 12 months.
COHN's SMR Rating (31) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for PWP (97) in the null industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew significantly faster than PWP’s over the last 12 months.
COHN's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PWP (69) in the null industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew similarly to PWP’s over the last 12 months.
PWP's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for COHN (99) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that PWP’s stock grew significantly faster than COHN’s over the last 12 months.
| COHN | PWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COHN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while PWP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- COHN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PWP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COHN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COHN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PWP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
COHN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -5.20% price change this week, while PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +14.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
COHN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
PWP is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.89% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
Advertisement
COHN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that COHN and CNCK have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COHN and CNCK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COHN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COHN | 100% | +1.91% | ||
| CNCK - COHN | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| PWP - COHN | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.40% | ||
| KEEL - COHN | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
| NDAQ - COHN | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| DEFT - COHN | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.89% | ||
More | ||||
PWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.