Advertisement
COHN vs PWP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COHN is a Hold and PWP is a Buy.
COHN's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for COHN turned positive on October 29, 2026. Looking at past instances where COHN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 39 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
Following a +9.45% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where COHN advanced for three days, in 216 of 287 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for COHN moved out of overbought territory on November 12, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 27 of the 29 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 45 of 51 cases where COHN's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 12, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on COHN as a result. In 71 of 88 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
COHN moved below its 50-day moving average on November 12, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for COHN crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on November 12, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 19 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where COHN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
COHN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 11, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for COHN entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 31 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 55 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. COHN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 59 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.520) is normal, around the industry mean (3.120). P/E Ratio (1.040) is within average values for comparable stocks, (6.734). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.010) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.098) settles around the average of (8.976) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.195) is also within normal values, averaging (16.899).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. COHN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock worse than average.
PWP in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on October 14, 2026
PWP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 29 of 34 cases where PWP's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where PWP's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 20 of 27 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PWP just turned positive on October 29, 2026. Looking at past instances where PWP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Following a +6.67% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PWP advanced for three days, in 220 of 295 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 12, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PWP as a result. In 64 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
PWP moved below its 50-day moving average on October 14, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PWP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
The Aroon Indicator for PWP entered a downward trend on November 02, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 7 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 19 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. PWP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 77 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: PWP's P/B Ratio (-23.097) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (3.120). PWP has a moderately high P/E Ratio (42.750) as compared to the industry average of (6.734). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.020) settles around the average of (8.976) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.119) is also within normal values, averaging (16.899).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PWP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
COHN | PWP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 31 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 19 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COHN's Valuation (59) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PWP (77) in the null industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew similarly to PWP’s over the last 12 months.
PWP's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as COHN (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that PWP’s stock grew similarly to COHN’s over the last 12 months.
COHN's SMR Rating (31) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for PWP (97) in the null industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew significantly faster than PWP’s over the last 12 months.
COHN's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PWP (75) in the null industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew similarly to PWP’s over the last 12 months.
PWP's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for COHN (96) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that PWP’s stock grew significantly faster than COHN’s over the last 12 months.
| COHN | PWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 1 day ago 73% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COHN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PWP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- COHN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PWP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COHN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COHN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
- PWP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
COHN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.80% price change this week, while PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -24.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
COHN is expected to report earnings on Mar 09, 2027.
PWP is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.88% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
Advertisement
COHN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that COHN and CNCK have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COHN and CNCK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COHN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COHN | 100% | -13.46% | ||
| CNCK - COHN | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| PWP - COHN | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.06% | ||
| KEEL - COHN | 22% Poorly correlated | -5.80% | ||
| NDAQ - COHN | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| DEFT - COHN | 21% Poorly correlated | -8.61% | ||
More | ||||
PWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.