Advertisement
COOT vs MDLZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COOT is a Hold and MDLZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COOT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- COOT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MDLZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COOT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COOT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MDLZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
COOT (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -1.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1082.08%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (+0.35% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.52% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| COOT | MDLZ | COOT / MDLZ | |
| Capitalization | 14.9M | 79.4B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -23.16M | 6B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -55.025 | 4.220 | -1,304% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.98 | 22.49 | 107% |
| Revenue | 37.9M | 37.1B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 1.44M | 1.5B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 22.7M | 21.5B | 0% |
MDLZ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COOT | MDLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 34% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 44% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 19 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 38% |
Advertisement
COOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that COOT and MAMA have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COOT and MAMA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COOT | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| MAMA - COOT | 10% Poorly correlated | +4.12% | ||
| MDLZ - COOT | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| LSF - COOT | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| ATPC - COOT | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
| HSY - COOT | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||
MDLZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| HSY - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
More | ||||