Advertisement
COP vs WDS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both COP and WDS operate in the energy sector, with COP focusing on diversified exploration and production across North America and beyond, while WDS emphasizes liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects primarily in Australia.
- WDS has delivered stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at approximately 48-52%, outpacing COP's 31% gain amid favorable energy market dynamics.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks facing pressure from easing crude oil prices, with COP experiencing pullbacks after strong gains and WDS a one-month decline of about 5%.
- COP boasts a larger market capitalization of $149 billion compared to WDS's roughly $60 billion, offering greater scale and liquidity.
- COP provides a dividend yield of 2.76% with a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 19.23, appealing to income-focused investors, while WDS shows higher growth momentum but elevated volatility.
- Analysts anticipate COP to beat upcoming quarterly earnings estimates, signaling positive sentiment amid LNG expansion plans.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines COP and WDS, two prominent players in the oil and gas industry navigating volatile energy markets. Investors and traders interested in sector exposure, particularly those tracking exploration, production, and LNG developments, will find value in understanding their relative performance. With global demand shifts and commodity price fluctuations influencing sentiment, this analysis highlights key differences in business models, recent momentum, and market positioning to aid informed decision-making in the current environment.
COP Overview and Recent Performance
ConocoPhillips (COP) is an independent exploration and production (E&P) company engaged in crude oil, natural gas, LNG, and natural gas liquids across segments including Alaska, Lower 48, Canada, Europe/Middle East/North Africa, and Asia Pacific. In recent market activity, COP shares have shown resilience with a YTD gain of 31.65%, trading around $122 with a market cap of $149 billion, though pullbacks occurred amid easing crude prices due to geopolitical factors. Sentiment has been buoyed by expectations of beating Q1 earnings, LNG growth prospects, and strong free cash flow generation, despite mixed monthly returns following earlier monthly gains of over 15%.
WDS Overview and Recent Performance
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is an Australian energy firm specializing in oil and gas E&P, with a strong emphasis on LNG production and projects in Australia and internationally. Shares have delivered robust YTD performance of approximately 48-52%, trading near $23 with a market cap around $60 billion, outperforming broader benchmarks despite a recent one-month dip of about 5% linked to energy sector pressures. Positive developments include record production highlights from prior periods and ongoing growth initiatives, though shares have faced headwinds from fluctuating commodity prices in recent weeks, contributing to relative volatility compared to U.S. peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the top 25 AI trading bots out of over 350 available on the platform, each designed to trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions like volatility plays and sector-specific signals. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns ranging from 15% to 167%, win rates of 48% to 88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 in top performers. Examples include energy-focused agents with 78% annualized returns and semiconductor bots hitting 100%+, using timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days. Traders can explore these for real-time signals tailored to current markets—visit the page to discover bots suited to your style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
COP and WDS share energy sector exposure but differ in business models: COP offers broad E&P diversification across regions, while WDS leans heavily into LNG with Australian assets, exposing it more to global gas demand. Growth drivers include LNG expansions for both, but WDS benefits from higher YTD momentum at 48-52% versus COP's 31%, though recent weeks show COP with steadier trends amid oil price softening. Risk factors highlight WDS's greater sensitivity to commodity swings and ADR trading dynamics, contrasted by COP's scale and dividend appeal. Market sentiment favors COP ahead of earnings, while WDS rides production strengths in a trade-off between growth potential and stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward WDS based on superior YTD trend consistency and higher relative momentum in recent energy market positioning, despite short-term pullbacks. Factors like robust production growth and outperformance against benchmarks suggest probabilistic upside, though COP remains competitive with its diversification and earnings catalysts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COP is a Hold and WDS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- COP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
COP (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -7.26% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -8.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -7.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
COP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
WDS is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (-7.50% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| COP | WDS | COP / WDS | |
| Capitalization | 135B | 38.9B | 347% |
| EBITDA | 24.6B | 9.35B | 263% |
| Gain YTD | 20.616 | 32.503 | 63% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.85 | 14.15 | 133% |
| Revenue | 58.2B | 13B | 448% |
| Total Cash | 6.36B | 5.94B | 107% |
| Total Debt | 23.3B | 13.7B | 170% |
COP | WDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WDS's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as COP (44) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to COP’s over the last 12 months.
COP's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (53) in the null industry. This means that COP’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.
WDS's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as COP (100) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to COP’s over the last 12 months.
WDS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as COP (55) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to COP’s over the last 12 months.
WDS's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as COP (18) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to COP’s over the last 12 months.
| COP | WDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 67% | 8 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 13 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 2 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
WDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then VET could also see price increases.