Advertisement
PR vs WDS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Permian Resources (PR) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- PR reported record free cash flow of $751 million in Q2 2026 alongside a 3% sequential increase in oil production, supported by multiple acquisitions in the Permian Basin.
- WDS delivered a 28% sequential rise in operating revenue to $4.185 billion in its June 2026 quarter, driven by higher realized prices amid global energy market conditions.
- PR has achieved stronger year-to-date share price appreciation, trading near $23.75 as of late August 2026 after a period of significant gains.
- WDS offers a higher trailing dividend yield near 5%, providing income-focused investors with greater current return compared to PR’s approximately 2.6% yield.
- PR operates with lower leverage, targeting a net debt-to-EBITDAX ratio near 0.5x by year-end 2026, while WDS maintains a broader international LNG portfolio with different capital intensity.
- Both stocks have benefited from elevated energy prices in recent weeks, though PR’s domestic shale focus contrasts with WDS’s exposure to LNG contracts and global trade dynamics.
Introduction
Permian Resources (PR) and Woodside Energy (WDS) represent two distinct segments of the energy sector: U.S. shale exploration and production versus international liquefied natural gas (LNG) development. This comparison highlights differences in business models, recent operational results, capital allocation, and market positioning. Investors and traders evaluating energy exposure may find the analysis relevant when assessing growth-oriented upstream assets against more mature, dividend-paying international operators in the current commodity environment.
PR Overview and Recent Performance
Permian Resources Corporation focuses on oil and natural gas exploration and production primarily in the Permian Basin. In the second quarter of 2026, the company posted record adjusted free cash flow of $751 million and total average production of 376.4 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day. Oil output rose 3% sequentially to 198.1 thousand barrels per day, aided by workovers and higher working interests. Management raised full-year 2026 oil production guidance to a midpoint of 199 thousand barrels per day while keeping capital expenditures largely flat year-over-year. Multiple acreage acquisitions closed in 2026 have expanded the company’s footprint and are expected to support further output growth. Share price performance has reflected these operational improvements, with PR trading near $23.75 in late August 2026 following substantial gains over recent months.
WDS Overview and Recent Performance
Woodside Energy Group Ltd is an Australian-headquartered producer with significant LNG operations and upstream assets across multiple regions. For the June 2026 quarter, the company reported operating revenue of $4.185 billion, up 28% sequentially, supported by stronger realized prices averaging $85 per barrel of oil equivalent. Production volumes declined modestly due to planned maintenance and weather impacts, yet sales volumes remained resilient. The stock has delivered solid year-to-date returns, closing near $24.33 in the U.S. market as of late August 2026. WDS maintains an attractive dividend profile, with a trailing yield near 5%, and continues to advance projects such as Scarborough while optimizing its portfolio through selective divestments.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform’s hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze and trade thousands of tickers across equities, ETFs, and other instruments. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions—based on performance metrics, win rates, and strategy suitability—appear in the trending section. Available bots span multiple timeframes from 5-minute to 60-minute intervals, employ varied styles including trend-following and mean-reversion, and have recorded annualized returns ranging from the mid-double digits to over 200% in select cases, with win rates commonly between 55% and 67%. Each robot maintains distinct risk parameters, profit factors, and ticker universes. Review the full suite of options on the Trending AI Robots page to identify strategies that match individual objectives.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Permian Resources operates a concentrated, capital-efficient shale model in a single prolific U.S. basin, enabling rapid production responses and lower breakeven costs relative to many international peers. Woodside Energy maintains a diversified global LNG portfolio that provides longer-term contract visibility but involves higher upfront capital and longer project cycles. Recent momentum favors PR through sequential production gains and record free cash flow generation, while WDS has benefited from price realizations and consistent shareholder distributions. Risk profiles differ: PR carries commodity price and operational execution exposure with modest leverage, whereas WDS faces currency, geopolitical, and LNG contract renewal considerations alongside a larger balance sheet. Market sentiment has rewarded PR’s growth trajectory more aggressively in recent weeks, though WDS offers greater income stability for conservative allocations.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including stronger recent production growth, free cash flow consistency, and favorable operational catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models would likely assign a probabilistic edge to PR in the current environment. WDS remains competitive through dividend yield and portfolio scale, yet the combination of trend consistency and capital efficiency observed in PR’s recent results positions it ahead on relative momentum indicators. Outcomes remain subject to commodity price movements and execution variables.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PR is a StrongBuy and WDS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WDS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +2.42% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
PR is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
WDS is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (+2.72% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| PR | WDS | PR / WDS | |
| Capitalization | 19.9B | 43.8B | 45% |
| EBITDA | 3.31B | 9.35B | 35% |
| Gain YTD | 72.085 | 56.367 | 128% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.32 | 14.78 | 104% |
| Revenue | 5.08B | 13B | 39% |
| Total Cash | 138K | 5.94B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 3.69B | 13.7B | 27% |
PR | WDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WDS's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PR (61) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PR’s over the last 12 months.
PR's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (40) in the null industry. This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.
PR's SMR Rating (80) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (80) in the null industry. This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.
PR's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (44) in the null industry. This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.
PR's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (18) in the null industry. This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.
| PR | WDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 70% | 10 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 58% |
Advertisement