Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWG vs FNY
COWG vs FNY Comparison
Open Charts COWG vs FNY
COWG vs FNY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWG vs. FNY commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Hold and FNY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWG has more net assets: 2.21B vs. FNY (578M). FNY has a higher annual dividend yield than COWG: FNY (12.140) vs COWG (7.760). COWG was incepted earlier than FNY: COWG (4 years) vs FNY (15 years). COWG (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FNY (0.73). FNY has a higher turnover COWG (108.00) vs COWG (108.00).
| COWG | FNY | COWG / FNY | |
| Gain YTD | 7.760 | 12.140 | 64% |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 578M | 382% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.73 | 67% |
| Turnover | 108.00 | 130.00 | 83% |
| Yield | 0.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWG | FNY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| LRCX - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| TXN - COWG | 69% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| KLAC - COWG | 69% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| AMAT - COWG | 67% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| MPWR - COWG | 65% Loosely correlated | +8.35% | ||
More | ||||
FNY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNY has been closely correlated with CSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNY jumps, then CSW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNY | 100% | -0.55% | ||
| CSW - FNY | 76% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| ONTO - FNY | 69% Closely correlated | +3.22% | ||
| MKSI - FNY | 69% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| ESI - FNY | 69% Closely correlated | +3.12% | ||
| RMBS - FNY | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
More | ||||