Advertisement
CPAC vs MLM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAC is a Hold and MLM is a Hold.
| CPAC | MLM | CPAC / MLM | |
| Capitalization | 1.06B | 34.8B | 3% |
| EBITDA | 604M | 2.09B | 29% |
| Gain YTD | 18.906 | -20.865 | -91% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.14 | 31.90 | 54% |
| Revenue | 2.25B | 6.69B | 34% |
| Total Cash | 199M | 112M | 178% |
| Total Debt | 1.39B | 6.35B | 22% |
CPAC | MLM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPAC's Valuation (4) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (70). This means that CPAC’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.
CPAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLM (63). This means that CPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.
MLM's SMR Rating (42) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (54). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.
CPAC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as MLM (63). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.
CPAC's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLM (48). This means that CPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.
| CPAC | MLM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 5 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 41% | 4 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 62% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPAC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while MLM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CPAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CPAC (@Construction Materials) experienced а -1.20% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was -3.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -4.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -14.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
CPAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
MLM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (-4.21% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
Advertisement
MLM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLM | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| VMC - MLM | 88% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| CRH - MLM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| EXP - MLM | 66% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| TTAM - MLM | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| AMRZ - MLM | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
More | ||||