Advertisement
CPAC vs MLM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAC is a Hold and MLM is a StrongBuy.
CPAC in +1.03% Uptrend, rising for three consecutive days on October 22, 2026
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where CPAC advanced for three days, in 166 of 244 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CPAC as a result. In 67 of 114 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CPAC just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where CPAC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 52 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
CPAC moved above its 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for CPAC moved out of overbought territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 37 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 17 of the 37 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 46%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CPAC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 40%.
CPAC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CPAC entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 2 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 74, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 5 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: CPAC's P/B Ratio (0.807) is slightly lower than the industry average of (2.313). P/E Ratio (5.092) is within average values for comparable stocks, (19.908). CPAC's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.050) is slightly lower than the industry average of (0.876). CPAC's Dividend Yield (0.380) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.048). P/S Ratio (1.662) is also within normal values, averaging (2.242).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CPAC’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
MLM in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026
MLM moved above its 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 32 of 45 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on MLM as a result. In 60 of 93 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MLM just turned positive on October 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where MLM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 25 of 42 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Following a +1.99% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MLM advanced for three days, in 193 of 320 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for MLM moved out of overbought territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 33 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 12 of the 33 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 36%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 4 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MLM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.
MLM broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 16, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for MLM entered a downward trend on October 19, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 74, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MLM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 87 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.120) is normal, around the industry mean (2.313). P/E Ratio (12.431) is within average values for comparable stocks, (19.908). MLM's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.833) is slightly higher than the industry average of (0.876). Dividend Yield (0.007) settles around the average of (0.048) among similar stocks. MLM's P/S Ratio (4.486) is slightly higher than the industry average of (2.242).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
CPAC | MLM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 58 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPAC's Valuation (5) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (87). This means that CPAC’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.
CPAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLM (58). This means that CPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.
MLM's SMR Rating (42) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (54). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.
CPAC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as MLM (59). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.
CPAC's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as MLM (94). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.
| CPAC | MLM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 40% | 13 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 64% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MLM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CPAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MLM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CPAC (@Construction Materials) experienced а +0.39% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +1.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -25.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
CPAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
MLM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (-0.47% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
Advertisement
CPAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAC and EXP have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAC and EXP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPAC | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| EXP - CPAC | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.25% | ||
| RETO - CPAC | 4% Poorly correlated | -9.44% | ||
| MLM - CPAC | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
| JHX - CPAC | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.47% | ||
| CX - CPAC | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||
MLM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLM | 100% | -2.03% | ||
| VMC - MLM | 88% Closely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| CRH - MLM | 72% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| EXP - MLM | 66% Closely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| TTAM - MLM | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| AMRZ - MLM | 64% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||