CPAC
Price
$6.32
Change
-$0.01 (-0.16%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
541.98M
55 days until earnings call
USLM
Price
$124.52
Change
+$2.93 (+2.41%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.57B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPAC vs USLM

Header iconCPAC vs USLM Comparison
Open Charts CPAC vs USLMBanner chart's image
Cementos Pacasmayo SAA
Price$6.32
Change-$0.01 (-0.16%)
Volume$2.48K
Capitalization541.98M
United States Lime & Minerals
Price$124.52
Change+$2.93 (+2.41%)
Volume$168.48K
Capitalization3.57B
CPAC vs USLM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPAC vs. USLM commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAC is a StrongBuy and USLM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CPAC: $6.32 vs. USLM: $124.52)
Brand notoriety: CPAC and USLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPAC: 32% vs. USLM: 119%
Market capitalization -- CPAC: $541.98M vs. USLM: $3.57B
CPAC [@Construction Materials] is valued at $541.98M. USLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $76.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $10.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSLM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USLM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, USLM is a better buy in the long-term than CPAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USLM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USLM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USLM is a better buy in the short-term than CPAC.

Price Growth

CPAC (@Construction Materials) experienced а +1.94% price change this week, while USLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +10.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

USLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.48% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USLM($3.57B) has a higher market cap than CPAC($542M). USLM has higher P/E ratio than CPAC: USLM (28.56) vs CPAC (9.20). CPAC YTD gains are higher at: 20.843 vs. USLM (-6.034). CPAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 459M vs. USLM (169M). USLM has less debt than CPAC: USLM (4.83M) vs CPAC (16.5M). CPAC has higher revenues than USLM: CPAC (2.03B) vs USLM (352M).
CPACUSLMCPAC / USLM
Capitalization542M3.57B15%
EBITDA459M169M272%
Gain YTD20.843-6.034-345%
P/E Ratio9.2028.5632%
Revenue2.03B352M576%
Total Cash80.6MN/A-
Total Debt16.5M4.83M342%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPAC vs USLM: Fundamental Ratings
CPAC
USLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2477
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5732
SMR RATING
1..100
5137
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6944
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPAC's Valuation (2) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for USLM (80). This means that CPAC’s stock grew significantly faster than USLM’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (57). This means that USLM’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's SMR Rating (37) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (51). This means that USLM’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (46). This means that USLM’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (69). This means that USLM’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPACUSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JARTX55.840.12
+0.22%
Janus Henderson Forty S
GCTMX15.37N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq C
BRSYX15.39N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R6
SEHAX15.97N/A
N/A
SEI US Equity Factor Allocation A (SIIT)
FBPGX27.78N/A
N/A
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Dividend Plus A

CPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAC and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAC and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAC
1D Price
Change %
CPAC100%
-0.16%
HCMLY - CPAC
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
USLM - CPAC
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
RETO - CPAC
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
CAPT - CPAC
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.50%
CX - CPAC
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
More

USLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USLM has been loosely correlated with KNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USLM jumps, then KNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USLM
1D Price
Change %
USLM100%
+2.41%
KNF - USLM
59%
Loosely correlated
-8.20%
EXP - USLM
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
VMC - USLM
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
BCC - USLM
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
SMID - USLM
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
More