CPAC
Price
$6.25
Change
-$0.11 (-1.73%)
Updated
Aug 4, 04:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
523.15M
79 days until earnings call
USLM
Price
$103.64
Change
+$4.62 (+4.67%)
Updated
Aug 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.68B
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPAC vs USLM

Header iconCPAC vs USLM Comparison
Open Charts CPAC vs USLMBanner chart's image
Cementos Pacasmayo SAA
Price$6.25
Change-$0.11 (-1.73%)
Volume$811
Capitalization523.15M
United States Lime & Minerals
Price$103.64
Change+$4.62 (+4.67%)
Volume$3.54K
Capitalization1.68B
CPAC vs USLM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPAC vs. USLM commentary
Aug 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAC is a Hold and USLM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CPAC: $6.25 vs. USLM: $103.64)
Brand notoriety: CPAC and USLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPAC: 28% vs. USLM: 100%
Market capitalization -- CPAC: $523.15M vs. USLM: $1.68B
CPAC [@Construction Materials] is valued at $523.15M. USLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSLM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPAC is a better buy in the long-term than USLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USLM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPAC is a better buy in the short-term than USLM.

Price Growth

CPAC (@Construction Materials) experienced а +3.37% price change this week, while USLM (@Construction Materials) price change was -4.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

USLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-1.11% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USLM($1.68B) has a higher market cap than CPAC($523M). USLM has higher P/E ratio than CPAC: USLM (22.59) vs CPAC (11.27). CPAC YTD gains are higher at: 21.537 vs. USLM (-25.316). CPAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 476M vs. USLM (109M). USLM (188M) and CPAC (186M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . USLM has less debt than CPAC: USLM (5.5M) vs CPAC (6.99M). CPAC has higher revenues than USLM: CPAC (1.97B) vs USLM (281M).
CPACUSLMCPAC / USLM
Capitalization523M1.68B31%
EBITDA476M109M437%
Gain YTD21.537-25.316-85%
P/E Ratio11.2722.5950%
Revenue1.97B281M702%
Total Cash186M188M99%
Total Debt6.99M5.5M127%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPAC vs USLM: Fundamental Ratings
CPAC
USLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5136
SMR RATING
1..100
5238
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7196
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPAC's Valuation (2) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for USLM (71). This means that CPAC’s stock grew significantly faster than USLM’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (51). This means that USLM’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's SMR Rating (38) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (52). This means that USLM’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as USLM (58). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as USLM (96). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPACUSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MELAX14.96-0.06
-0.40%
Morgan Stanley Inst EMkts Ldrs A
FMUIX14.87-0.08
-0.54%
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv IS
OIGAX34.45-0.35
-1.01%
Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr A
EEMIX9.04-0.14
-1.53%
MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research I
DNLCX52.36-0.84
-1.58%
BNY Mellon Active MidCap C

CPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAC and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAC and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAC
1D Price
Change %
CPAC100%
+0.90%
HCMLY - CPAC
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
USLM - CPAC
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
BCC - CPAC
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
CAPT - CPAC
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
CX - CPAC
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
More

USLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USLM has been loosely correlated with KNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USLM jumps, then KNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USLM
1D Price
Change %
USLM100%
-0.56%
KNF - USLM
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
EXP - USLM
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
VMC - USLM
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
BCC - USLM
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
SMID - USLM
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
More