It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CQP’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whilePAGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CQP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +3.09% price change this week, while PAGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +5.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.59%.
CQP is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
PAGP is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
CQP | PAGP | CQP / PAGP | |
Capitalization | 23.9B | 3.63B | 659% |
EBITDA | 5.75B | 3.05B | 188% |
Gain YTD | 17.598 | 29.494 | 60% |
P/E Ratio | 7.11 | 18.22 | 39% |
Revenue | 9.66B | 48.7B | 20% |
Total Cash | 575M | 453M | 127% |
Total Debt | 16B | 8.03B | 199% |
CQP | PAGP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAGP's Valuation (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (21). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAGP (49). This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to PAGP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's SMR Rating (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAGP (65). This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAGP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAGP (46). This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to PAGP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAGP (30). This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to PAGP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP | PAGP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago53% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago55% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago60% | 24 days ago64% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with ENLC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then ENLC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CQP | 100% | +1.30% | ||
ENLC - CQP | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
GEL - CQP | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.55% | ||
PAA - CQP | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
ET - CQP | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
PAGP - CQP | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGP has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGP jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAGP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PAGP | 100% | +0.31% | ||
PAA - PAGP | 95% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
ENLC - PAGP | 67% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
ET - PAGP | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
EPD - PAGP | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
OKE - PAGP | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
More |