This stock comparison examines PAA (Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.) and PAGP (Plains GP Holdings, L.P.), two closely linked entities in the midstream energy sector focused on crude oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) transportation, storage, and logistics across the U.S. and Canada. Traders seeking high-yield income with exposure to energy infrastructure, and investors tracking MLP (master limited partnership) performance amid fluctuating oil prices, will find value in their relative strengths. Recent market activity highlights their resilience, with both benefiting from Permian Basin production stability and strategic asset moves, aiding decisions on relative performance and market positioning.
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) operates as a master limited partnership (MLP) engaging in pipeline transportation, terminalling, storage, and gathering of crude oil and NGL through its Crude Oil and NGL segments. Headquartered in Houston, it manages extensive assets serving key basins like the Permian. In recent weeks, PAA shares have traded near 52-week highs around $22.65, with a year-to-date gain of 31.23% and one-year return of 47.97%, outpacing the S&P 500. Sentiment has been bolstered by Q4 2025 results showing adjusted EBITDA of $738 million, plans for NGL divestiture (expected Q1 2026 close pending approvals), and integration of the EPIC Crude Pipeline (renamed Cactus III), targeting mid-teens returns. These moves, alongside $100 million in projected cost savings by 2027 and a 3.25-3.75x leverage goal, have driven momentum despite revenue dips from lower volumes. Trading volume remains robust, reflecting sustained investor interest in its fee-based midstream model.
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP), the general partner of PAA, holds a 2% general partner interest and incentive distribution rights (IDRs), providing exposure to PAA's cash flows without direct operational assets. This structure ties its performance closely to the subsidiary. Recently, PAGP shares have hovered near highs at $24.23, posting a YTD return of 31.43% and one-year gain of 47.50%, mirroring PAA's outperformance. Influences include shared catalysts like the NGL sale and Cactus III synergies, with Q4 EPS reflecting operational results. Analyst updates, such as Truist's Buy initiation and Barclays' target raise, have supported sentiment, though shelf registrations signal potential capital raises. Elevated volume underscores alignment with midstream trends, though its higher PE ratio reflects GP economics.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. Only 25 elite bots earn a spot here, selected by AI analysis for their suitability to current market conditions like volatility in energy and tech. Standouts include semiconductor-focused agents with up to +95.99% annualized returns, 63% win rates, and 3.33 profit factors (profit factor measures gains relative to losses), alongside industrials bots at +93.12% annualized, 67% win rates, and 2.31 profit factors. Others target small caps or ETFs with 70-80% win rates and profit factors up to 3.0+. These bots employ momentum, sector rotation, and risk management for real-time signals. Explore Tickeron’s full suite to identify strategies matching your style.
PAA and PAGP share identical revenue TTM of $44.26 billion but differ in structure: PAA as the MLP drives operations with direct asset exposure, while PAGP leverages IDRs for higher payout potential post-coverage thresholds. Growth drivers align on Permian volumes and Cactus III (~$50 million synergies), but PAA targets pure crude focus via NGL sale. Recent momentum favors both with ~1-3% monthly gains, though PAGP shows slightly higher three-month upside (17.85% vs. 15.33%). Risk factors include regulatory delays on divestitures and oil price sensitivity, mitigated by low betas (0.48 vs. 0.44) and stable leverage. Sector exposure is midstream energy; sentiment tilts positive for PAA on value (PE 20.22 vs. 31.47), while PAGP offers GP leverage trade-off.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors PAA over PAGP due to its lower PE ratio, higher yield, and direct operational catalysts like NGL divestiture proceeds for debt reduction and cost savings. While both exhibit trend consistency and low volatility, PAA's relative positioning in recent momentum stocks lists and value metrics suggests higher probability of sustained outperformance in the midstream space.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PAA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAGP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PAA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
PAA (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -2.89% price change this week, while PAGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -3.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.03%.
PAA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
PAGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| PAA | PAGP | PAA / PAGP | |
| Capitalization | 15.5B | 4.65B | 333% |
| EBITDA | 2.91B | 2.82B | 103% |
| Gain YTD | 27.431 | 27.469 | 100% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.77 | 30.52 | 65% |
| Revenue | 44.3B | 44.3B | 100% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 11.5B | 11.5B | 100% |
PAA | PAGP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAA's Valuation (7) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAGP (9). This means that PAA’s stock grew similarly to PAGP’s over the last 12 months.
PAGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAA (7). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to PAA’s over the last 12 months.
PAGP's SMR Rating (46) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAA (64). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to PAA’s over the last 12 months.
PAGP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAA (44). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to PAA’s over the last 12 months.
PAGP's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAA (44). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to PAA’s over the last 12 months.
| PAA | PAGP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 66% | 13 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 53% | 5 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 56% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSMIX | 21.25 | 0.08 | +0.38% |
| iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Idx Instl | |||
| FRINX | 12.46 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income A | |||
| BGLAX | 12.79 | N/A | N/A |
| Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA | |||
| VTWAX | 54.88 | N/A | N/A |
| Vanguard Total World Stock Index Admiral | |||
| MAGKX | 17.15 | N/A | N/A |
| MoA Small Cap Growth Fund | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGP has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGP jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAGP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAGP | 100% | +1.34% | ||
| PAA - PAGP | 96% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| OKE - PAGP | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.09% | ||
| ET - PAGP | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| EPD - PAGP | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| TRGP - PAGP | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
More | ||||