Advertisement
EPD vs PAGP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) vs. Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- EPD boasts a larger market capitalization of approximately $82 billion and a lower trailing P/E ratio of 14.29, indicating potentially better value relative to earnings compared to PAGP's $4.6 billion market cap and P/E of 30.06.
- Both stocks have delivered strong year-to-date gains, with PAGP at 23.43% and EPD at 20.47%, reflecting robust midstream sector momentum.
- PAGP offers a higher dividend yield of 6.89% versus EPD's 5.76%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- EPD provides broader diversification across natural gas liquids (NGLs), crude oil, and natural gas, while PAGP focuses more on crude oil and NGL transportation.
- Recent market activity shows EPD gaining about 4% over the past 30 days amid positive analyst outlook and earnings anticipation.
Introduction
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) and Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP) are prominent players in the midstream energy sector, focusing on pipelines, storage, and transportation of hydrocarbons. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for income-oriented investors and traders seeking exposure to stable cash flows from energy infrastructure amid volatile commodity prices. Both companies benefit from growing demand for natural gas liquids and crude oil, but differ in scale, diversification, and yield profiles. By examining their recent performance, business models, and market positioning, investors can better assess relative strengths in the current environment.
EPD Overview and Recent Performance
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) is one of North America's largest publicly traded partnerships, providing midstream energy services including natural gas processing, NGL fractionation, crude oil pipelines, and petrochemical marketing. In recent market activity, EPD shares have shown modest gains, rising approximately 4% over the past 30 days, supported by sustained demand for midstream services and positive analyst price target adjustments. Sentiment has been bolstered by anticipation of quarterly earnings and project developments in key basins like the Permian. Broader performance reflects resilience, with year-to-date returns of 20.47% and a low beta of 0.53, indicating relative stability amid sector volatility.
PAGP Overview and Recent Performance
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP), through its subsidiary Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., operates extensive midstream infrastructure for crude oil gathering, transportation, storage, and NGL services primarily in the U.S. and Canada. Over recent weeks, PAGP has maintained strong momentum, contributing to year-to-date gains of 23.43%, driven by healthy crude volumes and operational efficiencies in major producing regions. Market sentiment remains positive, influenced by favorable energy demand trends and a low beta of 0.46, underscoring defensive qualities. Performance has aligned with broader midstream recovery, though narrower focus on crude exposes it more to oil price swings.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from a library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies, including pattern recognition, swing trading, and long-term holds, with varying timeframes from intraday to multi-year horizons. Only the most suitable for current market conditions—such as those excelling in volatile energy sectors or high-yield environments—earn a spot among the 25 featured trending agents. Stats highlight real-time signals with customizable risk management and no minimum balance requirements, enabling users to replicate professional-grade trades. Explore these tools to enhance your strategy in dynamic markets like midstream energy.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both EPD and PAGP operate in the midstream energy space but diverge in business models: EPD offers integrated services across NGLs, crude, natural gas, and petrochemicals, providing diversification, while PAGP emphasizes crude oil pipelines and NGL logistics, tying performance closely to oil volumes. Growth drivers include Permian Basin expansion for both, but EPD's scale supports steadier capital projects. Recent momentum favors PAGP slightly on YTD returns, yet EPD edges in 12-month gains and valuation metrics. Risk factors involve commodity exposure, with PAGP more sensitive to crude fluctuations; sector sentiment is upbeat for fee-based contracts amid rising energy demand.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward EPD due to its superior scale, diversified revenue streams, attractive valuation, and consistent trend performance in recent market activity. While PAGP offers a compelling higher yield and strong momentum, EPD's stability and lower relative risk position it favorably for sustained outperformance probabilities in the midstream sector.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPD is a StrongBuy and PAGP is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAGP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- EPD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PAGP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EPD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PAGP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EPD (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -1.48% price change this week, while PAGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -0.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
EPD is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
PAGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.49% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| EPD | PAGP | EPD / PAGP | |
| Capitalization | 80.6B | 4.83B | 1,670% |
| EBITDA | 9.81B | 2.81B | 350% |
| Gain YTD | 19.791 | 32.242 | 61% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.80 | 31.26 | 44% |
| Revenue | 51.6B | 45.3B | 114% |
| Total Cash | 191M | 172M | 111% |
| Total Debt | 33.9B | 11.6B | 292% |
EPD | PAGP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAGP's Valuation (9) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (11). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
PAGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (5). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's SMR Rating (46) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAGP (57). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to PAGP’s over the last 12 months.
PAGP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (50). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
PAGP's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (37). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
| EPD | PAGP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 44% | 12 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
EPD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPD has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPD jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.
PAGP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGP has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGP jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAGP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAGP | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| PAA - PAGP | 96% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| OKE - PAGP | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| EPD - PAGP | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| TRGP - PAGP | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| WES - PAGP | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More | ||||