Investors evaluating midstream energy infrastructure often encounter two distinct value propositions: diversified, integrated giants and focused, pure-play operators. This comparison between OKE (ONEOK, Inc.) and PAGP (Plains GP Holdings, L.P.) highlights precisely that tension. ONEOK has built an expansive platform spanning natural gas gathering and processing, NGLs, natural gas pipelines, and refined products and crude. Plains GP Holdings, meanwhile, is actively reshaping itself into a streamlined crude oil midstream entity. For income-oriented investors and those tracking relative performance in the energy infrastructure sector, understanding how these two names compare across business models, growth drivers, and risk profiles offers valuable perspective on where opportunity and stability currently reside.
OKE, headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma, operates one of the largest midstream infrastructure networks in the United States. The company's operations span four segments: Natural Gas Gathering and Processing, Natural Gas Liquids, Natural Gas Pipelines, and Refined Products and Crude. In recent months, ONEOK has demonstrated robust financial performance. Full-year 2025 net income attributable to ONEOK reached $3.39 billion, a 12% increase year-over-year, with diluted earnings per share of $5.42. Adjusted EBITDA climbed 18% to $8.02 billion, marking the company's 12th consecutive year of EBITDA expansion. The stock has traded in a 52-week range of approximately $64 to $96, recently changing hands near $93.50, reflecting a market capitalization of roughly $59 billion.
Key catalysts behind this performance include the successful integration of the EnLink and Medallion acquisitions, which have contributed meaningfully to volumes and earnings across ONEOK's system. The company reported $475 million in cumulative acquisition-related synergies through year-end 2025, ahead of original expectations. Additionally, ONEOK has advanced major organic growth projects, including the Bighorn natural gas processing plant in the Permian Basin and the Eiger Express Pipeline, a 450-mile natural gas pipeline that has already been expanded to 3.7 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of fully contracted capacity. The company recently raised its quarterly dividend by 4% to $1.07 per share, extending a 56-year streak of consecutive dividend payments.
PAGP (Plains GP Holdings, L.P.) is the publicly traded entity that holds a controlling interest in Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA (Plains All American Pipeline)), one of North America's largest crude oil transportation and logistics companies. PAGP consolidates PAA's financial results, making the two closely linked. Over recent quarters, PAGP has executed a significant strategic pivot: in mid-2025, the company announced the sale of substantially all of its NGL business to Keyera for approximately $3.75 billion, a transaction expected to close in 2026. This divestiture positions Plains as a pure-play crude oil midstream entity with reduced commodity exposure and a more durable cash flow profile.
For full-year 2025, PAGP reported adjusted EBITDA of $2.833 billion. The company also completed the acquisition of a 100% interest in the EPIC Crude Oil Pipeline during the fourth quarter, further consolidating its crude oil footprint in the Permian Basin. In a show of confidence, management announced a 10% increase in quarterly distributions, annualizing to $1.67 per unit. However, headwinds remain: the company has guided 2026 adjusted EBITDA to approximately $2.75 billion at the midpoint, reflecting a moderation in producer activity tied to lower crude oil prices and flat Permian production growth expectations for the year. Analyst opinions on PAGP have been divided, with Raymond James issuing a Strong Buy rating while Barclays maintains an Underweight recommendation, underscoring the uncertainty around the company's transition.
For traders seeking to navigate the complexities of stocks like OKE and PAGP, automated tools can provide a data-driven edge. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots, each designed to trade specific tickers with unique strategies, timeframes, and risk profiles. Not all bots are created equal, however. The Trending AI Robots section curates only those bots that have demonstrated the strongest alignment with current market conditions. These AI robots span various trading styles, from swing trading and trend-following to scalping and momentum-based approaches, and their performance statistics — including win rates, trade frequency, and profitability metrics — are transparently displayed. Some bots on the platform have generated double-digit annualized returns, while others emphasize consistency and risk management over raw return potential. Exploring this curated selection allows traders to identify AI-driven strategies that match their investment objectives and market outlook.
The most striking difference between OKE and PAGP lies in diversification versus focus. ONEOK operates across four midstream segments, giving it exposure to natural gas, NGLs, crude oil, and refined products. This breadth provides a natural hedge: weakness in one commodity or region can be offset by strength elsewhere. PAGP, by divesting its NGL business, is deliberately narrowing its exposure to crude oil transportation and logistics — a move that reduces complexity but increases sensitivity to crude-specific macro conditions.
From a scale perspective, OKE is the larger entity with full-year 2025 adjusted EBITDA of $8.02 billion versus PAGP's $2.83 billion. OKE also trades at a more moderate valuation, with a trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of roughly 16.7, while PAGP's earnings have been more volatile amid its transformation. On the income front, OKE's 4.6% dividend yield and 56-year track record of consecutive payments appeal to conservative income investors. PAGP offers a competitive distribution yield, though its distribution coverage ratio is being recalibrated as the company absorbs its EPIC acquisition and exits NGL operations.
Risk profiles differ as well. OKE's 2026 guidance assumes WTI (West Texas Intermediate) crude oil prices of $55 to $60 per barrel and incorporates headwinds from lower Bakken and Permian volumes and reduced upgrade margins. PAGP faces similar macro pressures but also carries execution risk related to its NGL divestiture and EPIC integration. On the other hand, PAGP's streamlined structure may offer higher torque if crude oil markets strengthen, while OKE's diversified model aims for steadier, compound growth. Both companies maintain disciplined balance sheets, with OKE targeting a leverage ratio near 3.5x and PAGP operating within a 3.25x to 3.75x target range.
Based on observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely lean toward OKE in the current environment. ONEOK's 12-year streak of EBITDA growth, the successful capture of nearly $500 million in acquisition synergies, its diversified revenue base with approximately 90% fee-based earnings, and a well-covered dividend with a 56-year history collectively suggest a more predictable earnings trajectory. PAGP's strategic transformation into a pure-play crude oil company is compelling and may unlock significant long-term value, but the associated execution risk, flat near-term Permian production expectations, and divided analyst sentiment introduce greater uncertainty. The AI would likely view OKE as offering a more favorable balance of trend stability, catalyst visibility, and risk-adjusted return potential under current market conditions, while acknowledging that PAGP's restructuring story could gain favor if crude oil macro conditions improve.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OKE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAGP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OKE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
OKE (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while PAGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +3.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.
OKE is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
PAGP is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| OKE | PAGP | OKE / PAGP | |
| Capitalization | 58.7B | 5.24B | 1,121% |
| EBITDA | 7.92B | 2.81B | 282% |
| Gain YTD | 30.024 | 43.470 | 69% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.61 | 33.91 | 49% |
| Revenue | 35.2B | 45.3B | 78% |
| Total Cash | 172M | 172M | 100% |
| Total Debt | 33.7B | 11.6B | 291% |
OKE | PAGP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 43 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAGP's Valuation (10) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as OKE (16). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to OKE’s over the last 12 months.
PAGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OKE (44). This means that PAGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than OKE’s over the last 12 months.
OKE's SMR Rating (54) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAGP (57). This means that OKE’s stock grew similarly to PAGP’s over the last 12 months.
OKE's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAGP (39). This means that OKE’s stock grew similarly to PAGP’s over the last 12 months.
PAGP's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as OKE (44). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to OKE’s over the last 12 months.
| OKE | PAGP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 46% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 63% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGP has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGP jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAGP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAGP | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| PAA - PAGP | 96% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| EPD - PAGP | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| OKE - PAGP | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| TRGP - PAGP | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| WES - PAGP | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
More | ||||