Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs TDF
CQQQ vs TDF Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs TDF
CQQQ vs TDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. TDF commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a StrongBuy and TDF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 3.23B vs. TDF (314M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than TDF: CQQQ (9.942) vs TDF (-1.091). CQQQ was incepted earlier than TDF: CQQQ (17 years) vs TDF (32 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than TDF (1.33). TDF has a higher turnover CQQQ (37.00) vs CQQQ (37.00).
| CQQQ | TDF | CQQQ / TDF | |
| Gain YTD | 9.942 | -1.091 | -911% |
| Net Assets | 3.23B | 314M | 1,029% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.33 | 49% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 63.10 | 59% |
| Yield | 1.97 | 0.81 | 243% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | TDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 24 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TWGIX | 62.17 | N/A | N/A |
| American Century Growth I | |||
| WTSGX | 27.26 | N/A | N/A |
| Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Gr Ret | |||
| GILCX | 45.66 | N/A | N/A |
| NAA Large Cap Value Institutional | |||
| GHTRX | 18.71 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq R6 | |||
| FSTKX | 40.11 | N/A | N/A |
| Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc | |||
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +4.38% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| KC - CQQQ | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
More | ||||
TDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TDF and YUMC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TDF and YUMC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDF | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| YUMC - TDF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
| PDD - TDF | -1% Poorly correlated | +1.35% |