| CQQQ | TDF | CQQQ / TDF | |
| Gain YTD | -11.327 | -6.728 | 168% |
| Net Assets | 2.82B | 305M | 926% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.33 | 49% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 63.10 | 59% |
| Yield | 2.28 | 0.83 | 276% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
| CQQQ | TDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 7 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TBT | 39.60 | 0.28 | +0.71% |
| ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury | |||
| RMCA | 23.31 | N/A | N/A |
| Rockefeller California Municipal Bd ETF | |||
| PJAN | 50.43 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| Innovator US Equity Power Buff ETF™ Jan | |||
| PFOE | 22.32 | -0.29 | -1.29% |
| Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF | |||
| GLNK | 9.82 | -0.57 | -5.49% |
| Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| KC - CQQQ | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.15% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that TDF and YUMC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TDF and YUMC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDF | 100% | -1.35% | ||
| YUMC - TDF | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.62% | ||
| PDD - TDF | -2% Poorly correlated | -1.64% |