Advertisement
CRGY vs YPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRGY is a Hold and YPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- YPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRGY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- YPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRGY (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -6.12% price change this week, while YPF (@Integrated Oil) price change was +3.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.05%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRGY is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.
YPF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (-0.91% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
@Integrated Oil (-0.43% weekly)Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
| CRGY | YPF | CRGY / YPF | |
| Capitalization | 2.29B | 15.2B | 15% |
| EBITDA | 1.47B | 4.34B | 34% |
| Gain YTD | -35.137 | -9.033 | 389% |
| P/E Ratio | 62.45 | 11.70 | 534% |
| Revenue | 3.59B | 19.2B | 19% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.01B | - |
| Total Debt | 3.48B | 10.6B | 33% |
YPF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 34 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRGY | YPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 8 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 74% | 13 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EEV | 10.04 | 0.06 | +0.64% |
| ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Mkts | |||
| FFUT | 53.22 | 0.13 | +0.24% |
| Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | |||
| BUFD | 27.61 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF | |||
| GOVZ | 9.60 | -0.02 | -0.26% |
| iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bd ETF | |||
| MKOR | 32.32 | -0.32 | -0.98% |
| Matthews Korea Active ETF | |||
CRGY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRGY has been closely correlated with CHRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRGY jumps, then CHRD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRGY | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| CHRD - CRGY | 85% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| NOG - CRGY | 85% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| VTLE - CRGY | 85% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| SM - CRGY | 85% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| PR - CRGY | 84% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
More | ||||
YPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YPF has been closely correlated with TGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if YPF jumps, then TGS could also see price increases.