EC
Price
$17.25
Change
+$0.05 (+0.29%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
34.02B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YPF
Price
$52.62
Change
+$0.21 (+0.40%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
20.63B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EC vs YPF

EC vs YPF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EC vs. YPF commentary
Sep 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EC is a StrongBuy and YPF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2026
Stock price -- (EC: $17.25 vs. YPF: $52.62)
Brand notoriety: EC: Not notable vs. YPF: Notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EC: 82% vs. YPF: 62%
Market capitalization -- EC: $34.02B vs. YPF: $20.63B
EC [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $34.02B. YPF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $20.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $655.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $123.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileYPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • YPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EC is a better buy in the long-term than YPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • YPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YPF is a better buy in the short-term than EC.

Price Growth

EC (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +4.55% price change this week, while YPF (@Integrated Oil) price change was +4.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

EC is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

YPF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+2.80% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EC($34B) has a higher market cap than YPF($20.6B). YPF has higher P/E ratio than EC: YPF (27.84) vs EC (11.32). EC YTD gains are higher at: 89.979 vs. YPF (45.520). EC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 28.04T vs. YPF (7.33B). EC has higher revenues than YPF: EC (116.95T) vs YPF (20.6B).
ECYPFEC / YPF
Capitalization34B20.6B165%
EBITDA28.04T7.33B382,444%
Gain YTD89.97945.520198%
P/E Ratio11.3227.8441%
Revenue116.95T20.6B567,738%
Total CashN/A2.47B-
Total DebtN/A10.8B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EC vs YPF: Fundamental Ratings
EC
YPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
120
SMR RATING
1..100
1181
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
105
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EC's Valuation (27) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YPF (73). This means that EC’s stock grew somewhat faster than YPF’s over the last 12 months.

EC's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as YPF (20). This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to YPF’s over the last 12 months.

EC's SMR Rating (11) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for YPF (81). This means that EC’s stock grew significantly faster than YPF’s over the last 12 months.

EC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as YPF (40). This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to YPF’s over the last 12 months.

YPF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EC (10). This means that YPF’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECYPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALOY10.100.04
+0.40%
REalloys Inc.
WSBK12.99-0.01
-0.08%
Winchester Bancorp Inc
SXI275.78-0.59
-0.21%
Standex International Corp
MKL1826.72-16.26
-0.88%
Markel Group
AMBO1.99-0.11
-5.24%
Ambow Education Holding Ltd

YPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YPF has been closely correlated with TGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if YPF jumps, then TGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YPF
1D Price
Change %
YPF100%
+0.40%
TGS - YPF
84%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
CRGY - YPF
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
EC - YPF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
CVE - YPF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
PBR - YPF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
More