Advertisement
CRWD vs OKTA
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CrowdStrike (CRWD) vs. Okta (OKTA) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CRWD has delivered stronger year-to-date returns and higher revenue growth compared to OKTA amid broad AI-driven cybersecurity demand.
- Both companies reported solid recent quarterly results, with CRWD posting record annual recurring revenue (ARR) additions and OKTA raising full-year guidance after a strong backlog increase.
- CRWD trades at a significantly higher valuation multiple, reflecting its larger market capitalization and growth trajectory relative to OKTA.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks benefiting from heightened focus on AI-related security threats, though CRWD has exhibited more pronounced momentum in analyst price target revisions.
- Risk factors include elevated valuations for both, with CRWD showing greater volatility tied to its premium pricing and OKTA facing competition in identity management.
- Sector exposure centers on cybersecurity, where CRWD emphasizes endpoint protection and OKTA focuses on identity and access management.
Introduction
CrowdStrike (CRWD) and Okta (OKTA) represent two prominent players in the cybersecurity sector, each addressing distinct yet overlapping aspects of enterprise security needs. CRWD specializes in cloud-native endpoint protection and threat intelligence, while OKTA provides identity and access management solutions critical for zero-trust architectures. This comparison examines their relative performance, business models, and market positioning in the current environment, offering insights for traders and investors evaluating growth-oriented technology stocks. Market participants focused on AI tailwinds, sector rotation within software, or relative value opportunities between high-growth cybersecurity names may find this analysis particularly relevant for portfolio construction and tactical allocation decisions.
CRWD Overview and Recent Performance
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. delivers cloud-based cybersecurity through its Falcon platform, leveraging artificial intelligence for threat detection and response. In recent market activity, the stock has shown robust upward momentum, supported by strong quarterly results that included record net new annual recurring revenue (ARR) and accelerating growth in flexible licensing models. Revenue over the trailing twelve months grew approximately 24%, outpacing broader market medians. Analyst sentiment has remained constructive, with multiple firms raising price targets amid expanding AI-driven cybersecurity opportunities. Performance has been influenced by broader sector enthusiasm for solutions addressing machine-speed threats, contributing to elevated valuation multiples and sustained investor interest despite periodic pullbacks.
OKTA Overview and Recent Performance
Okta, Inc. provides identity and access management platforms that enable secure authentication and authorization for enterprises. Recent market activity reflects solid momentum following earnings that exceeded expectations, prompting the company to raise its annual revenue outlook and highlight record subscription backlog. Revenue growth has remained in the low double digits year-over-year, with improvements in operating metrics and customer expansion. The stock has participated in the cybersecurity rally tied to AI security concerns, posting meaningful gains over recent weeks. Sentiment has been supported by analyst upgrades and recognition of OKTA’s positioning in identity security for AI agents, though the shares trade at more moderate multiples relative to faster-growing peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles tailored to prevailing market conditions. Only the most suitable and statistically robust bots earn placement in this trending section, reflecting metrics such as win rates, drawdowns, and consistency that stand out in current environments. Available bots span diverse approaches, from short-term momentum systems to longer-horizon trend followers, each with unique risk-reward characteristics and ticker coverage. Traders seeking automated, data-driven strategies can explore the full range on the Trending AI Robots page for potential alignment with their objectives.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CRWD and OKTA operate in complementary segments of cybersecurity: CRWD emphasizes endpoint detection and response with broad platform adoption, while OKTA centers on identity management and access controls. Growth drivers differ, with CRWD benefiting from rapid ARR expansion and AI integration across its Falcon suite, contrasted by OKTA’s focus on backlog growth and new product contributions in identity security. Recent momentum has favored CRWD with higher percentage gains and more frequent analyst target increases, though OKTA has demonstrated resilience through guidance raises and backlog strength. Risk factors include CRWD’s elevated price-to-sales multiple amid its larger market capitalization versus OKTA’s comparatively lower valuation but exposure to platform competition. Both maintain significant sector exposure to cybersecurity demand amplified by AI threats, yet trade-offs emerge in scale, profitability trajectories, and sensitivity to broader software spending cycles.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, recent ARR and backlog momentum, and relative positioning within the AI-enhanced cybersecurity theme, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic edge to CRWD. Its demonstrated capacity for record net new ARR additions and sustained analyst support suggest more consistent near-term drivers compared to OKTA’s solid but comparatively moderated growth profile. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to prevailing data patterns rather than forward guarantees.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWD is a Buy and OKTA is a Buy.
CRWD | OKTA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OKTA's Valuation (79) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that OKTA’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OKTA (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew significantly faster than OKTA’s over the last 12 months.
OKTA's SMR Rating (84) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CRWD (89) in the null industry. This means that OKTA’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
OKTA's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CRWD (34) in the null industry. This means that OKTA’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as OKTA (32) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to OKTA’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | OKTA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 18 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 82% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while OKTA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- OKTA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OKTA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- OKTA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +6.09% price change this week, while OKTA (@Computer Communications) price change was +7.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.
OKTA is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-0.35% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
Advertisement
CRWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | -2.90% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 85% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| OKTA - CRWD | 77% Closely correlated | -5.54% | ||
| FTNT - CRWD | 74% Closely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| RBRK - CRWD | 71% Closely correlated | -3.73% | ||
| TENB - CRWD | 71% Closely correlated | -6.66% | ||
More | ||||