Advertisement
OKTA vs PANW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Okta (OKTA) vs. Palo Alto Networks (PANW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Okta reported fiscal second-quarter 2027 revenue of $805 million, up 11% year over year, with adjusted earnings per share of $1.05 beating estimates and prompting a modest raise in full-year guidance.
- Palo Alto Networks shares rose approximately 10-12% in recent sessions amid broader cybersecurity sector strength following peer earnings beats, with year-to-date gains exceeding 100%.
- Both companies operate in the cybersecurity sector and have seen investor interest tied to AI-related security demand, though Okta's recent results highlighted accelerating backlog growth while Palo Alto Networks awaits its fiscal fourth-quarter report.
- Okta's market capitalization stands near $29 billion with a focus on identity management, compared to Palo Alto Networks' approximately $303 billion market cap and broader platform including network and cloud security.
- Recent market activity shows Okta experiencing sharper post-earnings volatility and gains, while Palo Alto Networks has benefited from sector tailwinds and sustained long-term outperformance.
- Relative positioning favors Okta for near-term momentum indicators and Palo Alto Networks for scale and diversified exposure in the cybersecurity space.
Introduction
Okta and Palo Alto Networks represent two prominent players in the cybersecurity industry, offering complementary solutions in identity management and network security, respectively. This comparison examines their recent performance, business models, and market positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating relative opportunities within the sector. The analysis draws on observable financial metrics, earnings outcomes, and sector sentiment from the past several weeks, providing a factual basis for understanding how these stocks have responded to current market conditions.
Okta Overview and Recent Performance
Okta provides cloud-based identity and access management solutions that help organizations secure user and machine identities. In its fiscal second quarter ended July 31, the company delivered revenue of $805 million, an 11% increase year over year, alongside adjusted earnings per share of $1.05 that exceeded consensus estimates. Subscription backlog metrics strengthened, with current remaining performance obligations reaching $2.585 billion, up 14% year over year. These results contributed to a significant stock advance of approximately 20-29% in the immediate aftermath, reflecting positive investor response to the earnings beat and AI-driven demand commentary. Recent market activity has featured elevated volatility around these developments.
Palo Alto Networks Overview and Recent Performance
Palo Alto Networks delivers a comprehensive cybersecurity platform encompassing network security, cloud protection, and endpoint solutions. The stock has advanced notably in recent sessions, rising around 10-12% amid positive sector sentiment following peer earnings reports. Year-to-date performance has exceeded 100%, with the shares trading near recent highs around the $370-380 range. The company benefits from platformization efforts and recurring revenue streams, though its next quarterly update is scheduled for early September. Broader market activity has supported gains through industry-wide interest in cybersecurity spending.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated section highlighting its top-performing Trending AI Robots. The platform offers hundreds of AI trading bots that operate across thousands of tickers, each employing distinct strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions are featured in the trending section. Available bots display varying statistics on returns, drawdowns, and trade frequency, allowing users to review detailed metrics before considering any automated approach. This resource provides an informational overview for those interested in AI-assisted trading tools.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Okta centers on identity security with a subscription-heavy model that has shown recent acceleration in backlog and free cash flow metrics, while Palo Alto Networks maintains a wider platform spanning firewalls and cloud offerings with greater overall scale. Recent momentum has been more pronounced for Okta following its earnings release, contrasted with Palo Alto Networks' steadier sector-supported gains. Risk factors include Okta's higher valuation multiples relative to growth and Palo Alto Networks' premium pricing amid competition. Both face sector exposure to enterprise cybersecurity budgets, yet Okta's emphasis on AI agent identities presents a narrower catalyst compared to Palo Alto Networks' diversified portfolio. Market sentiment has lifted both in tandem with broader industry developments, though trade-offs center on growth consistency versus established market leadership.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, backlog acceleration, and post-report price stability, Tickeron's AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to OKTA for near-term trend alignment. Palo Alto Networks shows strength in scale and sustained positioning, yet the absence of an immediate catalyst in the latest period tempers relative favorability in the current window.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OKTA is a Hold and PANW is a Hold.
| OKTA | PANW | OKTA / PANW | |
| Capitalization | 29.1B | 270B | 11% |
| EBITDA | 412M | 1.99B | 21% |
| Gain YTD | 92.552 | 79.506 | 116% |
| P/E Ratio | 100.30 | 826.63 | 12% |
| Revenue | 3.07B | 10.6B | 29% |
| Total Cash | 2.3B | 3.11B | 74% |
| Total Debt | 53M | 2.07B | 3% |
OKTA | PANW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OKTA's Valuation (75) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PANW (98) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that OKTA’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for OKTA (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than OKTA’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's SMR Rating (83) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as OKTA (84) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to OKTA’s over the last 12 months.
OKTA's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PANW (37) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that OKTA’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OKTA (51) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than OKTA’s over the last 12 months.
| OKTA | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 11 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 53% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OKTA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PANW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- OKTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PANW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OKTA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OKTA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PANW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
Price Growth
OKTA (@Computer Communications) experienced а -2.40% price change this week, while PANW (@Computer Communications) price change was -0.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
OKTA is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2026.
PANW is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-3.13% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
Advertisement
OKTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OKTA has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OKTA jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OKTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OKTA | 100% | -2.69% | ||
| CRWD - OKTA | 75% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| SAIL - OKTA | 69% Closely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| TENB - OKTA | 68% Closely correlated | -5.99% | ||
| PANW - OKTA | 68% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
| RBRK - OKTA | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.54% | ||
More | ||||
PANW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | -2.32% | ||
| CRWD - PANW | 82% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| FTNT - PANW | 74% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| OKTA - PANW | 68% Closely correlated | -2.69% | ||
| NOW - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| TENB - PANW | 61% Loosely correlated | -5.99% | ||
More | ||||