Advertisement
CSGP vs MMI
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CoStar Group (CSGP) vs. Marcus & Millichap (MMI) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CSGP holds a market capitalization of about $15.4 billion, dwarfing MMI's $1.07 billion, reflecting greater scale in real estate data services.
- Both stocks operate in real estate services, but CSGP emphasizes analytics and online marketplaces, while MMI focuses on brokerage and financing, leading to differing sensitivities to transaction volumes.
- Recent market activity reveals CSGP volatility, with a 52% one-year drop offset by strong year-to-date gains of around 46%, compared to MMI's steadier 4.6% year-to-date rise.
- CSGP anticipates 22% revenue growth in upcoming quarterly results, bolstering growth prospects amid a $1.5 billion buyback announcement.
- MMI reported a strong prior-quarter earnings beat and recent high-value deals, supporting modest recovery in a challenging brokerage environment.
- Analyst price targets suggest moderate upside for both, with CSGP at $59.84 versus current levels around $36, and MMI near $28.
Introduction
This comparison examines CSGP and MMI, two key players in real estate services amid shifting market dynamics like interest rate pressures and commercial property trends. Investors eyeing sector exposure or diversification may find value in contrasting their business models, recent momentum, and risk profiles. Traders focused on relative performance could benefit from understanding how data-driven analytics versus transaction-based brokerage fare in current conditions, aiding informed positioning in a volatile real estate landscape.
CSGP Overview and Recent Performance
CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) delivers real estate information, analytics, and online marketplaces through platforms like LoopNet and Homes.com, serving brokers, owners, and investors across commercial and residential segments. In recent weeks, the stock has faced downward pressure, declining around 8% following a $1.5 billion share buyback pledge and a strategic refocus on core commercial real estate operations, amid a broader 52% one-year drop from highs near $97. Year-to-date gains near 46% reflect resilience, driven by marketplace expansion and anticipated 22% quarterly revenue growth. Sentiment has been mixed, with institutional sales citing capital allocation concerns, offset by analyst buy ratings and data releases on moderating retail rents and improving supply dynamics.
MMI Overview and Recent Performance
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (MMI) specializes in commercial real estate investment sales, financing, and advisory services, acting as a financial intermediary for owners, developers, and investors in multifamily, retail, and industrial properties. Recent market activity shows steadier movement, with shares up modestly year-to-date at 4.6% and a one-year return of about 7%, trading around $28 within a 52-week range of $24–$34. Positive catalysts include a prior-quarter earnings per share (EPS) beat to $0.34, record multifamily sales in Los Angeles, and a $62 million student housing portfolio deal. Brokerage volumes in private client segments have outpaced broader markets, though profitability remains challenged by thin margins in a rate-sensitive environment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates over 25 top performers from its library of 351 AI trading bots, which analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto to generate real-time signals suited to volatile conditions. These bots showcase win rates ranging from 48% to 88%, annualized returns up to +168%, profit factors of 1.5 to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 in top cases, with strategies spanning short-term scalping (minutes) to longer holds (weeks). Examples include semiconductor-focused bots with +90% annualized returns and 60%+ win rates on tickers like NVDA and SOXL. Diverse styles—momentum, mean reversion, sector rotation—adapt to market shifts, earning their trending status through consistent outperformance. Professional traders may explore these for automated insights aligned with current trends.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CSGP’s subscription-based model offers recurring revenue stability versus MMI’s cyclical commissions tied to deal flow, exposing the latter more to economic slowdowns. Growth drivers differ: CSGP leverages data platforms for scalability, while MMI depends on broker networks and financing volumes. Recent momentum favors CSGP’s YTD surge despite volatility (beta 0.92), over MMI’s steadier but lower path (beta 1.32). Risk factors include interest rates impacting both, but CSGP faces execution risks on expansions, and MMI profitability pressures (negative EPS). Sector exposure is concentrated in real estate, with CSGP showing stronger analyst conviction via higher price-to-sales multiples.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward CSGP with higher probability for outperformance, citing consistent revenue growth trends, expansive marketplace catalysts, and relative positioning despite recent pullbacks. MMI offers stability but trails in scalability metrics. Observable factors like trend durability and analyst targets suggest CSGP’s edge in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGP is a StrongBuy and MMI is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSGP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMMI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CSGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MMI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSGP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MMI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CSGP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -8.80% price change this week, while MMI (@Real Estate Development) price change was -2.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
MMI is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (+1.30% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CSGP | MMI | CSGP / MMI | |
| Capitalization | 12.4B | 1.11B | 1,114% |
| EBITDA | 272M | 27.2M | 1,000% |
| Gain YTD | -56.544 | 6.590 | -858% |
| P/E Ratio | 417.43 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.41B | 782M | 436% |
| Total Cash | 1.22B | 187M | 650% |
| Total Debt | 1.19B | 75M | 1,587% |
CSGP | MMI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MMI's Valuation (77) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
MMI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
CSGP's SMR Rating (91) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as MMI (92) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that CSGP’s stock grew similarly to MMI’s over the last 12 months.
MMI's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (65) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
MMI's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (22) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
| CSGP | MMI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 57% | 19 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 9 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
CSGP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSGP has been loosely correlated with CIGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSGP jumps, then CIGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSGP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSGP | 100% | -2.99% | ||
| CIGI - CSGP | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| CBRE - CSGP | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| NMRK - CSGP | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| MMI - CSGP | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| JLL - CSGP | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||
MMI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMI has been loosely correlated with CWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMI jumps, then CWK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MMI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMI | 100% | -1.74% | ||
| CWK - MMI | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| CBRE - MMI | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| JLL - MMI | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| NMRK - MMI | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| FRPH - MMI | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
More | ||||