CSTE
Price
$1.74
Change
+$0.01 (+0.58%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
60.34M
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFF
Price
$92.27
Change
+$5.54 (+6.39%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.23B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSTE vs GFF

Header iconCSTE vs GFF Comparison
Open Charts CSTE vs GFFBanner chart's image
CSTE vs GFF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSTE vs. GFF commentary
Jun 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSTE is a Hold and GFF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 10, 2026
Stock price -- (CSTE: $1.75 vs. GFF: $92.27)
Brand notoriety: CSTE and GFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSTE: 37% vs. GFF: 85%
Market capitalization -- CSTE: $60.34M vs. GFF: $4.23B
CSTE [@Building Products] is valued at $60.34M. GFF’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $4.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $104.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSTE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSTE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFF is a better buy in the long-term than CSTE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSTE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSTE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFF is a better buy in the short-term than CSTE.

Price Growth

CSTE (@Building Products) experienced а -3.59% price change this week, while GFF (@Building Products) price change was +8.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSTE is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

GFF is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-0.92% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFF($4.23B) has a higher market cap than CSTE($60.3M). GFF YTD gains are higher at: 25.918 vs. CSTE (-6.183). GFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 275M vs. CSTE (-126.3M). GFF has more cash in the bank: 110M vs. CSTE (52.3M). CSTE has less debt than GFF: CSTE (105M) vs GFF (1.48B). GFF has higher revenues than CSTE: GFF (2.53B) vs CSTE (386M).
CSTEGFFCSTE / GFF
Capitalization60.3M4.23B1%
EBITDA-126.3M275M-46%
Gain YTD-6.18325.918-24%
P/E RatioN/A90.46-
Revenue386M2.53B15%
Total Cash52.3M110M48%
Total Debt105M1.48B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSTE vs GFF: Fundamental Ratings
CSTE
GFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3876
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10014
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSTE's Valuation (1) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFF (81) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSTE’s stock grew significantly faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSTE (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CSTE’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's SMR Rating (100) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSTE (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to CSTE’s over the last 12 months.

CSTE's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as GFF (45) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSTE’s stock grew similarly to GFF’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSTE (92) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CSTE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSTEGFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSTE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOTR39.950.07
+0.17%
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF
SDFI35.420.03
+0.10%
AB Short Duration Income ETF
PPIE28.100.01
+0.02%
Putnam PanAgora ESG Intl Eq ETF
OVLH41.45-0.08
-0.20%
Overlay Shares Hedged Lrg Cp Eq ETF
BBUS132.95-0.45
-0.34%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity ETF

CSTE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSTE has been loosely correlated with IR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSTE jumps, then IR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSTE
1D Price
Change %
CSTE100%
+0.87%
IR - CSTE
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.00%
BXC - CSTE
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.21%
JBI - CSTE
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.48%
LII - CSTE
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
WMS - CSTE
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
More

GFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFF
1D Price
Change %
GFF100%
+6.39%
BLDR - GFF
64%
Loosely correlated
+6.04%
MAS - GFF
63%
Loosely correlated
+4.92%
LPX - GFF
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.48%
OC - GFF
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.16%
CSL - GFF
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
More