Advertisement
CSW vs RBC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSW is a Hold and RBC is a Hold.
| CSW | RBC | CSW / RBC | |
| Capitalization | 4.9B | 15.7B | 31% |
| EBITDA | 266M | 592M | 45% |
| Gain YTD | 2.750 | 10.347 | 27% |
| P/E Ratio | 41.14 | 48.90 | 84% |
| Revenue | 1.17B | 1.95B | 60% |
| Total Cash | 47.5M | 124M | 38% |
| Total Debt | 855M | 878M | 97% |
CSW | RBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 42 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSW's Valuation (78) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as RBC (85) in the null industry. This means that CSW’s stock grew similarly to RBC’s over the last 12 months.
RBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as CSW (53) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew similarly to CSW’s over the last 12 months.
CSW's SMR Rating (67) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as RBC (72) in the null industry. This means that CSW’s stock grew similarly to RBC’s over the last 12 months.
CSW's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as RBC (62) in the null industry. This means that CSW’s stock grew similarly to RBC’s over the last 12 months.
CSW's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as RBC (37) in the null industry. This means that CSW’s stock grew similarly to RBC’s over the last 12 months.
| CSW | RBC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 71% | 18 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 59% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CSW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- RBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CSW (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -2.51% price change this week, while RBC (@Tools & Hardware) price change was +1.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -3.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.92%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -4.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSW is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
RBC is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-3.58% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Tools & Hardware (-4.44% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
Advertisement
CSW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSW has been loosely correlated with ATMU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSW jumps, then ATMU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSW | 100% | +3.09% | ||
| ATMU - CSW | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RBC - CSW | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.51% | ||
| HLMN - CSW | 56% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NDSN - CSW | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.28% | ||
| TTC - CSW | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RBC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBC has been closely correlated with TKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RBC jumps, then TKR could also see price increases.