CSW
Price
$330.09
Change
+$7.47 (+2.32%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.38B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HLMN
Price
$8.36
Change
+$0.05 (+0.60%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.62B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSW vs HLMN

CSW vs HLMN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSW vs. HLMN commentary
Aug 22, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSW is a Hold and HLMN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 22, 2026
Stock price -- (CSW: $322.62 vs. HLMN: $8.31)
Brand notoriety: CSW and HLMN are both not notable
CSW represents the Industrial Machinery, while HLMN is part of the Tools & Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSW: 55% vs. HLMN: 62%
Market capitalization -- CSW: $5.38B vs. HLMN: $1.62B
CSW [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $5.38B. HLMN’s [@Tools & Hardware] market capitalization is $1.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $254.84B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tools & Hardware] industry ranges from $29.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $16.26B. The average market capitalization across the [@Tools & Hardware] industry is $8.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLMN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSW is a better buy in the long-term than HLMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLMN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HLMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSW is a better buy in the short-term than HLMN.

Price Growth

CSW (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -5.92% price change this week, while HLMN (@Tools & Hardware) price change was -5.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -3.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.74%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -3.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSW is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

HLMN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-3.91% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

@Tools & Hardware (-3.43% weekly)

Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSW($5.38B) has a higher market cap than HLMN($1.62B). CSW has higher P/E ratio than HLMN: CSW (45.16) vs HLMN (41.75). CSW YTD gains are higher at: 10.236 vs. HLMN (-4.042). CSW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 266M vs. HLMN (250M). CSW has more cash in the bank: 47.5M vs. HLMN (27.7M). HLMN has less debt than CSW: HLMN (812M) vs CSW (855M). HLMN has higher revenues than CSW: HLMN (1.56B) vs CSW (1.17B).
CSWHLMNCSW / HLMN
Capitalization5.38B1.62B331%
EBITDA266M250M106%
Gain YTD10.236-4.042-253%
P/E Ratio45.1641.75108%
Revenue1.17B1.56B75%
Total Cash47.5M27.7M171%
Total Debt855M812M105%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSW: Fundamental Ratings
CSW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSWHLMN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HLMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCHI26.72N/A
N/A
GMO Beyond China ETF
TSEL28.53-0.09
-0.33%
Touchstone Sands Capital US Sel Gr ETF
BCPL24.47-0.15
-0.62%
BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF
DVGR26.97-0.26
-0.96%
DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF
SOXS46.25-0.80
-1.70%
Direxion Daily Semicondct Bear 3X ETF

CSW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSW has been loosely correlated with ATMU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSW jumps, then ATMU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSW
1D Price
Change %
CSW100%
-1.70%
ATMU - CSW
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
RBC - CSW
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.06%
HLMN - CSW
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.58%
NDSN - CSW
54%
Loosely correlated
+8.00%
DOV - CSW
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
More

HLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLMN has been closely correlated with HLIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLMN jumps, then HLIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLMN
1D Price
Change %
HLMN100%
-2.58%
HLIO - HLMN
71%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
DCI - HLMN
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
GGG - HLMN
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
NDSN - HLMN
61%
Loosely correlated
+8.00%
PNR - HLMN
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.76%
More