Advertisement
CSW vs HLMN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSW is a Hold and HLMN is a Hold.
| CSW | HLMN | CSW / HLMN | |
| Capitalization | 4.9B | 1.36B | 361% |
| EBITDA | 266M | 257M | 104% |
| Gain YTD | 2.750 | -19.400 | -14% |
| P/E Ratio | 41.14 | 34.90 | 118% |
| Revenue | 1.17B | 1.6B | 73% |
| Total Cash | 47.5M | 35.8M | 133% |
| Total Debt | 855M | 801M | 107% |
CSW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CSW | HLMN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 71% | 10 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 70% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while HLMN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CSW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HLMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLMN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- HLMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CSW (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -2.51% price change this week, while HLMN (@Tools & Hardware) price change was -9.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -3.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.92%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -4.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSW is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
HLMN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-3.58% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Tools & Hardware (-4.44% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
Advertisement
CSW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSW has been loosely correlated with ATMU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSW jumps, then ATMU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSW | 100% | +3.09% | ||
| ATMU - CSW | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RBC - CSW | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.51% | ||
| HLMN - CSW | 56% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NDSN - CSW | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.28% | ||
| TTC - CSW | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||