Advertisement
ATMU vs CSW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) vs. CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ATMU reported first-quarter 2026 results that exceeded analyst expectations, with net sales of $478 million and adjusted earnings per share of $0.69.
- CSW shares rose more than 5% in a single recent session amid broader market activity, while the company prepares to release fiscal fourth-quarter and full-year 2026 results on May 26, 2026.
- Both stocks have delivered positive year-to-date performance, though ATMU has shown stronger one-year returns relative to the S&P 500 compared with CSW.
- ATMU operates in the filtration industry with exposure to transportation and industrial end markets, while CSW maintains a diversified portfolio across contractor solutions, specialized reliability, and engineered building products.
- Recent dividend actions include a quarterly payout declaration by ATMU and prior increases by CSW, reflecting ongoing capital-return policies.
- Market sentiment for both names has been shaped by earnings delivery and macroeconomic conditions affecting industrial demand in recent weeks.
Introduction
Investors and traders often compare industrial stocks to assess relative value, sector exposure, and momentum within the broader market. ATMU and CSW represent distinct yet complementary segments of the industrial space, making their side-by-side evaluation relevant for those seeking diversified exposure or tactical positioning. This comparison highlights observable differences in business models, recent performance trends, and risk profiles drawn from publicly available financial disclosures and market data. Portfolio managers, sector analysts, and active traders monitoring industrial equities may find the analysis useful for understanding competitive positioning without reliance on forward projections.
ATMU Overview and Recent Performance
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells filtration products primarily under the Fleetguard brand for on- and off-highway applications. The company’s results for the first quarter of 2026 showed net sales of $478 million and adjusted earnings per share of $0.69, surpassing consensus estimates. In recent weeks, the stock has traded in a range near $48–49, with year-to-date returns of approximately 5.85% and one-year returns of 33.81%. A quarterly dividend of $0.055 per share was declared in mid-May 2026, payable in June. Sentiment has been supported by the earnings beat and steady demand in core filtration markets, though broader industrial cyclicality remains a factor influencing price behavior.
CSW Overview and Recent Performance
CSW Industrials, Inc. operates as a diversified industrial company with segments focused on contractor solutions, specialized reliability products, and engineered building solutions serving end markets such as HVAC, plumbing, and general industrial. Shares closed near $278 on May 22, 2026, after rising more than 5% in that session. Year-to-date returns stand at approximately 5.10%, with one-year returns of 7.62%. The company is scheduled to report fiscal fourth-quarter and full-year 2026 results on May 26, 2026. Recent corporate actions include an executive promotion and prior dividend increases. Price movement in recent weeks has reflected market rotation and anticipation surrounding the upcoming earnings release.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots drawn from a library of hundreds available on the platform. These bots execute strategies across thousands of tickers using varied styles, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions are featured in the trending section, providing users with transparent statistics on win rates, drawdowns, and historical results. The diversity of available bots allows traders to explore different risk-return profiles and ticker combinations. For more information, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ATMU concentrates on filtration solutions with direct exposure to transportation and heavy equipment cycles, whereas CSW offers broader diversification across multiple industrial niches. Recent momentum has favored CSW in short-term price action, while ATMU posted clearer earnings outperformance in its latest quarter. Risk factors for ATMU include raw-material costs and global supply-chain dynamics; CSW faces integration risks from acquisitions and end-market demand variability. Sector exposure differs, with ATMU more tightly linked to engine and vehicle filtration and CSW spanning building products and specialty chemicals. Market sentiment for both remains tied to industrial production indicators and macroeconomic data releases in recent weeks.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as earnings consistency, relative price stability, and sector positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable trend continuation to ATMU. This assessment reflects the company’s recent earnings delivery and longer-term return profile, though outcomes remain subject to ongoing volatility and new data releases.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATMU is a Buy and CSW is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATMU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCSW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ATMU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CSW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATMU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ATMU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CSW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ATMU (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.20% price change this week, while CSW (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.65%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
ATMU is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
CSW is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-2.34% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Industrial Machinery (+2.00% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| ATMU | CSW | ATMU / CSW | |
| Capitalization | 4.26B | 4.48B | 95% |
| EBITDA | 344M | 235M | 146% |
| Gain YTD | 0.603 | -6.344 | -10% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.44 | 40.95 | 50% |
| Revenue | 1.83B | 1.08B | 169% |
| Total Cash | 210M | 33.8M | 621% |
| Total Debt | 1.06B | 945M | 112% |
CSW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ATMU | CSW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 8 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 54% | 19 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ETHE | 14.01 | 0.22 | +1.60% |
| Grayscale Ethereum Staking ETF | |||
| MMU | 10.43 | 0.05 | +0.48% |
| Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund | |||
| FLEE | 39.29 | 0.06 | +0.15% |
| Franklin FTSE Europe ETF | |||
| SCMC | 25.06 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| Sterling Capital Multi-Strat Inc ETF | |||
| XTR | 28.41 | -0.12 | -0.42% |
| Global X S&P 500® Tail Risk ETF | |||
CSW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSW has been loosely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSW jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSW | 100% | -1.99% | ||
| DOV - CSW | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.61% | ||
| ATMU - CSW | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| NDSN - CSW | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| GGG - CSW | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| RBC - CSW | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
More | ||||