PH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CTIF | PH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 58% | 12 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 70% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTIF has been loosely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTIF jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PH - CTIF | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| ITW - CTIF | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| ETN - CTIF | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.94% | ||
| GWW - CTIF | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
| XYL - CTIF | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PH has been closely correlated with IR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PH jumps, then IR could also see price increases.