CVBF
Price
$22.45
Change
-$0.02 (-0.09%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.96B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ONBPO
Price
$24.97
Change
+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CVBF vs ONBPO

CVBF vs ONBPO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVBF vs. ONBPO commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVBF is a Hold and ONBPO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CVBF: $22.45 vs. ONBPO: $24.97)
Brand notoriety: CVBF and ONBPO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVBF: 42% vs. ONBPO: 28%
Market capitalization -- CVBF: $3.96B vs. ONBPO: $0
CVBF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.96B. ONBPO’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileONBPO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CVBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ONBPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVBF is a better buy in the long-term than ONBPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONBPO’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ONBPO’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ONBPO is a better buy in the short-term than CVBF.

Price Growth

CVBF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.46% price change this week, while ONBPO (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

CVBF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVBF YTD gains are higher at: 23.067 vs. ONBPO (2.570). ONBPO has more cash in the bank: 537M vs. CVBF (139M). CVBF has less debt than ONBPO: CVBF (500M) vs ONBPO (7.36B). ONBPO has higher revenues than CVBF: ONBPO (2.74B) vs CVBF (521M).
CVBFONBPOCVBF / ONBPO
Capitalization3.96BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.0672.570898%
P/E Ratio14.67N/A-
Revenue521M2.74B19%
Total Cash139M537M26%
Total Debt500M7.36B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVBF: Fundamental Ratings
CVBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVBFONBPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CVBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ONBPO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MB4.050.01
+0.25%
Masterbeef Group
NEWTP24.85-0.03
-0.12%
NewtekOne Inc.
HE13.50-0.07
-0.52%
Hawaiian Electric Industries
AVY159.24-1.47
-0.91%
Avery Dennison Corp
GRRR16.49-1.46
-8.13%
Gorilla Technology Group

ONBPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONBPO has been loosely correlated with MNSBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONBPO jumps, then MNSBP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONBPO
1D Price
Change %
ONBPO100%
+0.22%
MNSBP - ONBPO
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
WSBC - ONBPO
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
CVBF - ONBPO
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
HBNC - ONBPO
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
OBT - ONBPO
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More