Investors and traders focused on the aerospace and defense sector often compare CW and WWD due to their overlapping exposure to high-growth areas like military electronics, aircraft controls, and industrial applications. Both companies benefit from rising defense budgets, commercial aviation recovery, and geopolitical tensions driving demand. This stock comparison evaluates their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and key catalysts, aiding decisions on relative strength in a volatile environment. Whether seeking momentum plays or diversified industrials exposure, understanding these peers highlights trade-offs in valuation, growth, and risk.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) designs and manufactures engineered products for aerospace, defense, naval, power, and industrial markets. Operating through segments like Aerospace & Industrial, Defense Electronics, and Naval & Power, it supplies sensors, controls, pumps, valves, and avionics to military and commercial clients worldwide. Headquartered in Davidson, North Carolina, with about 9,100 employees, CW holds a market cap of approximately $26 billion.
In recent market activity, CW has sustained a long-term uptrend, gaining over 2% in the past month and nearly 30% YTD, trading near its 52-week high amid strong backlog growth and share price momentum. Positive sentiment stems from anticipated earnings growth, robust defense electronics demand, and analyst upgrades, including "buy" ratings with targets up to $823. Influences include sector tailwinds in naval systems and commercial power, supporting a beta of 0.92 (volatility measure relative to the market).
Woodward, Inc. (WWD) specializes in control solutions, including actuators, fuel systems, valves, and electronics for aerospace and industrial turbine engines. Its Aerospace and Industrial segments serve OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) in aircraft, ground vehicles, marine, and power generation, with aftermarket services adding recurring revenue. Based in Fort Collins, Colorado, employing around 10,200 people, WWD has a market cap near $22 billion.
Recent weeks have seen WWD advance with 20% YTD gains, fueled by a Q2 earnings beat exceeding estimates by 8.2% on record sales, prompting raised guidance and "strong buy" consensus. Analyst targets average $434, with recent hikes reflecting optimism in aerospace recovery and industrial controls. Performance reflects steady momentum, similar beta of 0.92, bolstered by dividend declarations and investor interest from prominent figures.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles like swing trading, scalping, and options. These bots display impressive stats, including annualized returns from 24% to 163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, profit factors (gross profit to loss ratio) up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 17 in leading examples. Tailored to current conditions in sectors like industrials, space, and defense-related plays, they offer real-time signals and risk management for copy trading. Traders can explore these high-conviction bots to enhance strategies amid volatile markets.
CW and WWD share aerospace and defense exposure but differ in business models: CW offers broader diversification into naval propulsion and nuclear power, while WWD emphasizes precision controls and actuators for engines. Growth drivers align on defense spending and aviation rebound, yet CW edges in recent momentum with higher YTD and one-year returns.
Risk profiles are comparable, with similar betas around 0.92 and debt-to-equity ratios near 46%, though WWD's recent free cash flow lags. CW trades at a higher P/E (55 vs. 43), signaling greater growth pricing, while both enjoy positive market sentiment via analyst buys. Sector positioning favors CW's backlog stability over WWD's earnings volatility trade-off.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward CW based on superior trend consistency, higher YTD relative performance, and backlog catalysts positioning it favorably in aerospace demand. While WWD shows strong post-earnings momentum, CW's stability and proximity to peaks suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance, though both warrant monitoring amid sector rotation.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWWD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CW (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +3.39% price change this week, while WWD (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +8.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.36%.
CW is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
WWD is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| CW | WWD | CW / WWD | |
| Capitalization | 28B | 23B | 122% |
| EBITDA | 818M | 784M | 104% |
| Gain YTD | 37.548 | 28.150 | 133% |
| P/E Ratio | 55.53 | 46.33 | 120% |
| Revenue | 3.61B | 4B | 90% |
| Total Cash | 343M | 501M | 68% |
| Total Debt | 1.15B | 1.14B | 101% |
CW | WWD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WWD's Valuation (65) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as CW (67) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that WWD’s stock grew similarly to CW’s over the last 12 months.
CW's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as WWD (4) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to WWD’s over the last 12 months.
WWD's SMR Rating (44) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as CW (46) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that WWD’s stock grew similarly to CW’s over the last 12 months.
CW's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as WWD (42) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to WWD’s over the last 12 months.
CW's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as WWD (31) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to WWD’s over the last 12 months.
| CW | WWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 47% | 13 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 70% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CW has been closely correlated with BWXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CW jumps, then BWXT could also see price increases.