Advertisement
HWM vs WWD
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Howmet Aerospace (HWM) vs. Woodward (WWD) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both HWM and WWD supply critical components to the aerospace sector, capitalizing on commercial aviation recovery and defense spending trends.
- WWD shows stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at approximately 20%, outpacing HWM's 17% gain.
- In recent market activity, WWD benefited from robust quarterly earnings that exceeded expectations, driving positive momentum.
- HWM, with a larger market capitalization of around $96 billion, faces upcoming earnings scrutiny amid recent share price softening.
- WWD trades at a lower price-to-earnings (PE) ratio of about 43 versus HWM's 65, suggesting relatively better valuation.
- One-year returns favor WWD significantly at over 90%, compared to HWM's 56%.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines HWM (Howmet Aerospace) and WWD (Woodward), two key players in the aerospace and defense supply chain. Both companies provide essential engineered solutions amid surging demand for aircraft components driven by commercial fleet expansions and geopolitical tensions boosting defense budgets. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors focused on industrial growth will find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuation metrics, and sector positioning. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in earnings momentum and stock resilience, offering insights into potential trade-offs in this high-growth niche.
HWM Overview and Recent Performance
Howmet Aerospace (HWM) specializes in advanced engineered products for aerospace engines, fastening systems, structures, and forged wheels, serving major OEMs in commercial and defense aviation. In recent weeks, the stock has experienced softening amid broader market pressures and insider sales, declining around 8% over the past month. Year-to-date gains stand at about 17%, supported by steady demand for engine components, though trading near $240 with a $96 billion market cap reflects caution ahead of quarterly earnings. Sentiment has been tempered by high PE ratio (price-to-earnings, around 65) and valuation concerns, despite a one-year return of 56% and analyst price targets averaging $281.
WWD Overview and Recent Performance
Woodward (WWD) designs control solutions like fuel systems, actuators, and electronics for aerospace and industrial turbines, with segments in both markets. Recent quarterly results showcased robust growth, with revenues up 23% to $1.09 billion and earnings surpassing estimates, leading to raised full-year guidance. The stock, trading around $363 with a $22 billion market cap, has delivered 20% YTD and over 90% one-year returns, reflecting strong aerospace demand. A PE ratio of approximately 43 and positive analyst updates have bolstered sentiment, though beta (market volatility measure) of 0.92 indicates moderate risk in recent market activity.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 350 available, each deploying diverse strategies across thousands of tickers. These bots exhibit impressive stats, including annualized returns from 23% to 162%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, tailored to current conditions like sector rotations in semiconductors, industrials, and space. Timeframes range from daily signals to multi-week holds, with risk-managed approaches such as take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Traders can explore these high-performing, real-time AI agents for momentum, trend-following, or volatility plays suited to today's market dynamics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
HWM emphasizes structural components and fastening, giving it broader exposure to airframe and engine builds, while WWD focuses on precision controls for engines and systems, enhancing efficiency in aerospace and industrial applications. Growth drivers differ: WWD leverages dual-segment diversification, posting superior recent momentum with earnings beats versus HWM's pre-earnings caution. Risk factors include HWM's higher beta (1.19) signaling greater volatility, contrasted by WWD's stability (beta 0.92). Sector overlap in aerospace supports both, but WWD edges in sentiment from recent outperformance and attractive valuation.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward WWD based on consistent earnings momentum, superior YTD and one-year returns, and favorable relative valuation in recent market activity. Factors like raised guidance and lower PE position it with higher probability for near-term upside, while HWM offers scale but trails in trend strength ahead of earnings.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWM is a Hold and WWD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HWM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWWD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HWM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- WWD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HWM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WWD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HWM (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -3.77% price change this week, while WWD (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -5.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
HWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
WWD is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (-2.02% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| HWM | WWD | HWM / WWD | |
| Capitalization | 104B | 20.8B | 500% |
| EBITDA | 2.55B | 784M | 325% |
| Gain YTD | 27.116 | 15.604 | 174% |
| P/E Ratio | 60.41 | 41.82 | 144% |
| Revenue | 8.62B | 4B | 216% |
| Total Cash | 2.44B | 501M | 486% |
| Total Debt | 4.69B | 1.14B | 410% |
HWM | WWD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WWD's Valuation (70) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as HWM (74) in the null industry. This means that WWD’s stock grew similarly to HWM’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as WWD (7) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to WWD’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as WWD (44) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to WWD’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's Price Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as WWD (47) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to WWD’s over the last 12 months.
WWD's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as HWM (34) in the null industry. This means that WWD’s stock grew similarly to HWM’s over the last 12 months.
| HWM | WWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 70% | 12 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AVIE | 74.20 | -0.16 | -0.22% |
| Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF | |||
| VYMI | 98.27 | -1.30 | -1.31% |
| Vanguard Intl Hi Div Yld Idx ETF | |||
| BBSC | 83.17 | -1.60 | -1.89% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Sml Cp Eq ETF | |||
| TSLR | 25.68 | -2.72 | -9.58% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | |||
| CRWU | 7.68 | -1.04 | -11.93% |
| T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | |||
HWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWM has been closely correlated with GE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWM jumps, then GE could also see price increases.
WWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WWD has been loosely correlated with HWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WWD jumps, then HWM could also see price increases.