This comparison examines HWM and WWD, two companies in the Aerospace & Defense industry, to highlight differences in scale, performance, and market positioning. The analysis draws on recent financial metrics and developments to assist traders and investors seeking objective data for portfolio decisions. It is particularly relevant for those focused on sector trends, relative valuation, and momentum within industrials, providing a factual framework without forward-looking recommendations.
Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) provides engineered solutions for aerospace and transportation markets through segments including Engine Products, Fastening Systems, Engineered Structures, and Forged Wheels. As of July 31, 2026, the stock closed at $282.26 with a market capitalization of approximately $113 billion. Recent market activity reflects strength tied to commercial aerospace demand, contributing to year-to-date returns near 38%. The company announced a quarterly dividend of $0.14 with an ex-date of August 7, 2026, and is scheduled to report second-quarter results on August 6. Sentiment has been supported by analyst target increases and robust earnings trends, including prior-quarter revenue growth of 19% year-over-year.
Woodward, Inc. (WWD) designs and manufactures control solutions for aerospace and industrial markets, operating through Aerospace and Industrial segments. The stock closed at $360.75 on July 31, 2026, with a market capitalization of about $21 billion. Recent market activity includes a third-quarter earnings release showing revenue of $1.11 billion, up 21% year-over-year, and adjusted EPS of $2.52. Year-to-date returns stand near 20%. The company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.32 with an ex-date of August 20, 2026. Performance reflects sector tailwinds alongside valuation considerations following the earnings report.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates select AI trading bots from hundreds available that trade thousands of different tickers. Only the best and most suitable for current market conditions are featured in this section. Bots exhibit varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and ticker sets, allowing users to explore options aligned with specific approaches. Factual data on the platform includes ranges of historical win rates, average returns, and trade volumes across strategies. For more details on these AI-driven tools, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
In business models, HWM emphasizes broader aerospace components with larger scale, while WWD focuses on specialized control systems across aerospace and industrial end-markets. Growth drivers for both center on aerospace recovery, though HWM shows higher revenue scale at $8.62 billion trailing twelve months versus WWD at $4.19 billion. Recent momentum favors HWM with stronger year-to-date gains, while WWD delivered a notable earnings beat. Risk factors include HWM’s higher debt levels and valuation multiple near 65 times earnings compared to WWD’s lower multiple near 40 and reduced debt-to-equity ratio. Sector exposure is shared, yet market sentiment reflects premium positioning for the larger-cap name amid consistent analyst support.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative positioning within the sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to HWM due to its larger scale, stronger recent returns, and sustained demand indicators. However, WWD presents trade-offs in valuation and earnings delivery that could appeal under different market regimes. This assessment relies on current data patterns rather than definitive outcomes.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HWM’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWWD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HWM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
HWM (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -2.33% price change this week, while WWD (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -1.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +3.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.44%.
HWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
WWD is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| HWM | WWD | HWM / WWD | |
| Capitalization | 113B | 21.2B | 533% |
| EBITDA | 2.75B | 857M | 321% |
| Gain YTD | 38.154 | 18.800 | 203% |
| P/E Ratio | 60.95 | 39.88 | 153% |
| Revenue | 9.12B | 4.19B | 217% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 475M | - |
| Total Debt | 4.69B | 1.36B | 345% |
HWM | WWD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WWD's Valuation (64) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as HWM (71) in the null industry. This means that WWD’s stock grew similarly to HWM’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as WWD (10) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to WWD’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as WWD (43) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to WWD’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's Price Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as WWD (55) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to WWD’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as WWD (47) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to WWD’s over the last 12 months.
| HWM | WWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 48% | 7 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 64% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWM has been closely correlated with GE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWM jumps, then GE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWM | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| GE - HWM | 74% Closely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| CW - HWM | 69% Closely correlated | -4.82% | ||
| WWD - HWM | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| SARO - HWM | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| BWXT - HWM | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.28% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WWD has been loosely correlated with HWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WWD jumps, then HWM could also see price increases.