CX
Price
$12.16
Change
-$0.42 (-3.34%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
17.55B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RETO
Price
$2.63
Change
+$0.14 (+5.62%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
9.26M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CX vs RETO

CX vs RETO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. RETO commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a Hold and RETO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CX: $12.16 vs. RETO: $2.63)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. RETO: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 74% vs. RETO: 7%
Market capitalization -- CX: $17.55B vs. RETO: $9.26M
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $17.55B. RETO’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $9.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $73.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $13.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRETO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RETO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CX is a better buy in the long-term than RETO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RETO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RETO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CX and RETO are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а -6.09% price change this week, while RETO (@Construction Materials) price change was -2.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.85% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($17.5B) has a higher market cap than RETO($9.26M). CX has higher P/E ratio than RETO: CX (36.46) vs RETO (0.39). CX YTD gains are higher at: 6.308 vs. RETO (-65.575). CX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.75B vs. RETO (-11.22M). RETO has less debt than CX: RETO (1.59M) vs CX (7.46B). CX has higher revenues than RETO: CX (16.5B) vs RETO (3.37M).
CXRETOCX / RETO
Capitalization17.5B9.26M189,046%
EBITDA2.75B-11.22M-24,480%
Gain YTD6.308-65.575-10%
P/E Ratio36.460.399,416%
Revenue16.5B3.37M489,469%
Total Cash330MN/A-
Total Debt7.46B1.59M468,887%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX vs RETO: Fundamental Ratings
CX
RETO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1345
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
8999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4388
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
697
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CX's Valuation (46) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as RETO (62) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to RETO’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RETO (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CX’s stock grew somewhat faster than RETO’s over the last 12 months.

CX's SMR Rating (89) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as RETO (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to RETO’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RETO (88) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CX’s stock grew somewhat faster than RETO’s over the last 12 months.

CX's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for RETO (97) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CX’s stock grew significantly faster than RETO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXRETO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RETO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VANI1.190.06
+5.31%
Vivani Medical
SLDP2.73-0.07
-2.50%
Solid Power
DD46.67-1.52
-3.15%
DuPont de Nemours
XPON0.46-0.02
-4.17%
Expion360 Inc
RUN12.81-0.81
-5.95%
Sunrun

CX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with TTAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then TTAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
-3.34%
TTAM - CX
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
CRH - CX
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
MLM - CX
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
VMC - CX
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
EXP - CX
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
More

RETO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RETO and CAPS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RETO and CAPS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RETO
1D Price
Change %
RETO100%
+5.63%
CAPS - RETO
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.77%
BCC - RETO
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
EXP - RETO
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
CX - RETO
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
USLM - RETO
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.76%
More