It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CYD (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +8.42% price change this week, while LI (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -7.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.89%.
CYD is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
LI is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| CYD | LI | CYD / LI | |
| Capitalization | 1.84B | 12.7B | 14% |
| EBITDA | 1.91B | -1.92B | -99% |
| Gain YTD | 40.537 | -24.335 | -167% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.07 | 99.38 | 23% |
| Revenue | 24.7B | 109B | 23% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 93.1B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 17.7B | - |
CYD | LI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CYD's Valuation (10) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for LI (78) in the null industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew significantly faster than LI’s over the last 12 months.
CYD's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for LI (100) in the null industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew significantly faster than LI’s over the last 12 months.
CYD's SMR Rating (82) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as LI (93) in the null industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew similarly to LI’s over the last 12 months.
CYD's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as LI (64) in the null industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew similarly to LI’s over the last 12 months.
LI's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYD (38) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that LI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYD’s over the last 12 months.
| CYD | LI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 9 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 77% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TMAR | 25.92 | 0.05 | +0.18% |
| FT Vest Emerging Mkts Buffr ETF - Mar | |||
| UFEB | 39.26 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Innovator US Equity Ultra Bffr ETF™ Feb | |||
| CVRD | 18.28 | N/A | N/A |
| Madison Covered Call ETF | |||
| JANM | 34.18 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Jan | |||
| CATH | 91.74 | -0.19 | -0.21% |
| Global X S&P 500® Catholic Values ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYD has been loosely correlated with TNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYD jumps, then TNC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYD | 100% | +1.66% | ||
| TNC - CYD | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| CXT - CYD | 33% Poorly correlated | -4.22% | ||
| ENOV - CYD | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
| LXFR - CYD | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
| HLMN - CYD | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LI has been loosely correlated with NIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LI jumps, then NIO could also see price increases.